Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
the venue is perfect - oem
that is classic greg_s!
NostraDoma -- i stand corrected re: the timing of the Spraguespeak, but it doesn't really change the bigger picture... does it?
btw, michael, i AM in the middle bud!
not wishing for Wave's failure in the least, but pointing out their (many) foibles & misdeeds as a mere counterbalance to the hyping of certain wavoids.
if they changed the way they operated (e.g., still no public disclosure of their gluttonous "compensation") & booked some keefing revs, i would re-visit the proposition of owning wavx.
of course, i'd also need that pesky little formal SEC investigation to be resolved in their favor & the baker's dozen or so of class action claims to be settled...
but i continue to remain open-minded to that possibility, however remote!
PS look for a re-test of $1.00 (absent good or bad news) in the next few weaks.
100% JMO
SO you don't need a weatherman for either?
SO does that also mean you know when to open the windows & let those cold breezes blow?
feels like a Spring Nor'easter is coming Wave's way.
brrrrrr.
JMO
PS woulda normally used the non-gender specific "meteorologist" but Zimmerman didn't write it that way...
Snack, you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows:
http://139.142.147.22/GifChartEngine.dll?interval_day=6&cus=0&indexSymbol=&securityType=....
looks like fund liquidation IMO -- curiously right after the SKS speech & again around 3-3:15pm
& down further (on volume) in AH:
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/intchart/frames/main.asp?time=1&freq=9&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&am....
what do the sellers know?
gap down @ the open?
btw, nice call Zen...
block selling does not suggest an MM "step aside."
Snack, maybe you actually believe what you post, but the chart strongly suggests otherwise.
it ain't some walkdown on 100 share mirror trades, this is concentrated selling:
http://139.142.147.22/GifChartEngine.dll?interval_day=6&cus=0&indexSymbol=&securityType=...
Snack -- it'll get cheaper IMO - oem
SOoooooooooooooo scorpio,
have you located that $5.7M Wave/DCIS contract documentation yet?
if not, it's okay -- maybe it just doesn't exist?
please feel free to provide whatever support is available for the purported $5.7M contract at your earliest convenience.
it would seem that w/this great $5.7M rev news, wavx wouldn't be hanging around $1.40 w/meager volume.
what gives?
tia
I don't see where I wrote that Wave is/was trying to 'hype' the stock.
I wrote that Wave needed to hype the stock in order to float $25M worth of shares (assuming of course that the SEC eventually approves the application). maybe a subtle semantic difference... maybe not?
SO Snack, you consider my challenge of a claim that Wave has a $5.7M K as hole digging?
please show me something that supports this claim.
if it exists, $5.7M in revs would certainly be good news for Wave, wouldn't it?
if there is nothing to support this claim which at this moment seems to be little more than conjecture, it's merely another day w/the status quo.
not unlike the slog of obtaining DOD approval for the secure signature stuff?
sorry that my reluctance to trust anything Wave makes you sad... IMO it is completely irrational to extend so much trust to a company with a track record such as Wave's.
to each their own i s'pose...
$5.7M contract?!?
i'm familiar w/the $350M K awarded to NG as awk's support for the 04/13/04 12M share P&D. BIO-Key is a direct participant in the DCIS initiative as their 9/3/04 PR represented & IMO biometrics are in the economic sweet-spot right now & TC will take some time to develop.
where you came up w/this $5.7M claim is completely unknown to me & presumably to the market as well -- please direct me to whatever documentation exists to support the claim that Wave has a K w/a near $6M rev oppty:
"Wave had been associated with that award to the tune of a $5.7 million contract. Fact, not fiction... look it up."
not sure what "...associated w/that award..." is supposed to mean -- sounds like Spraguespeak IMO.
don't intend to be unreasonably demanding in my request for support of this claim, but haven't seen diddly which even comes close to what you purported. it would seem logical that if it were true, that Wave would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially as the tank is almost empty & they need to hype the stock for the $25M offering/s.
if you have time, please provide support.
if not, well, color me unconvinced.
Armp it seems you might be miffed by the question.
please provide a cogent explanation for why Wave has never PRed any Defense Cross-credentialing Identification System (DCIS) relationship w/NG, yet are supposedly involved w/this particular DOD initiative.
if Wave was involved, maybe awk's speculation would be sensical, but when other companies PRed their NG-DCIS relationship almost eight months ago & all wavoids can point to are:
1) some blah, blah, blah from SKS in a CC (noting he has used GE, GM & many other major corps as examples of those who would might buy the "cool" things Wave provides) &
2) some second-hand reports of a purported powerpoint slide from the lunch-bunch (nevermind the possible Reg FD implications of sharing such seemingly material non-public info w/a select few voids at a SF restaurant)
for years & years, voids have claimed that all these incredible developments were behind the curtain of NDAs, yet little if anything has materialized publicly.
it really takes another leg out of the supposed NDA table IMO.
why is this any different than the multitude of similar past predictions?
BIO-Key PRed a DCIS deal w/NG last September - where is Wave's similar announcement?
tia
PS disclosure - have traded BKYI but am not currently long.
PPS did Wave ever successfully resubmit the secure signature software to the DOD?
TV -- if Wave did have a Northrop Grumman deal, why haven't they PRed it like this?
News 9/03/03 Northrop Grumman contract with BKYI
BIO-key Awarded Contract by Northrop Grumman
3 Sep 2003, 07:01am ET
http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=35545859
DoD Project to Authenticate Visitors of Military and Defense Facilities With Biometrics and ID Cards
MINNEAPOLIS, Sept. 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- BIO-key International, Inc. (BB:BKYI), the leader in finger-based biometric identification technology, announced today it has been awarded a contract as part of a Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) led team developing the Defense Cross- credentialing Identification System (DCIS).
BIO-key's Vector Segment Technology (VST) for authenticating and identifying individuals by their fingerprint is embedded in the DCIS prototype being used in a pilot test at several Department of Defense and Defense contractor facilities around the United States. The system will accept and process credentials from government employees and contractors using the newly adopted Common Access Card, standardized industry identification and a live- scan comparison of biometrics. BIO-key will provide secure, fast and accurate identification solutions for employees and contractors authorized to access contractor facilities by authenticating individual's biometrics to approved database records.
"This is one of the most important Federal security initiatives since the tragedy of September 11", said Mike DePasquale, CEO of BIO-key. "We are pleased that BIO-key has been selected to be a part of this team led by Northrop Grumman and contributing to the nation's defense."
"We are applying the most advanced techniques, technologies and security methodologies available and developing an expandable and scalable process that will enable additional applications within the government access control arena," said Wood Parker, vice president and general manager, Government Information Technology Division, Northrop Grumman Mission Systems.
Tom Colatosti, Chairman of BIO-key, added " We are thrilled with the momentum that BIO-key is building and the opportunity to partner with leading defense contractors and system integrators like Northrop Grumman on vital programs like DCIS, to provide security solutions to help prevent past tragedies by delivering proven biometric technology for sustainable security solutions that protect personal privacy while meeting national security objectives."
"By providing secure, streamlined physical access to contractors at military facilities and to military staff at contractor facilities, DCIS will provide a vital service for force protection," Mr. Parker added.
About Northrop Grumman
LEARN MORE ABOUT US: Northrop Grumman news releases, product information, photos and video clips are available on the Internet at: http://www.northropgrumman.com . Information specific to the Information Technology sector is available at: www.it.northropgrumman.com/index.html
About BIO-key
BIO-key develops and licenses advanced biometric finger identification technologies that are cost effective, scalable and easy to deploy. BIO-key products provide "True User Identification(TM)" for the prevention of data and identity theft while preventing false aliases. BIO-key pioneered the only finger identification algorithm that has been certified by the ICSA, and today continues that innovation by offering cost effective, high-performance one-to-many finger and one-to-one identification solutions that provide security and positive identification for both government and enterprise applications. (http://www.bio-key.com)
BIO-key Safe Harbor Statement
This news release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected on the basis of such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made based on management's beliefs, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to the "safe-harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For a more complete description of these and other risk factors that may affect the future performance of BIO-key International, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10- KSB and its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made and the Company undertakes no obligation to disclose any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
For additional information contact:
Albert Maruggi
612-325-8126
amaruggi@providentpartners.net
SOURCE BIO-key International, Inc.
-0- 09/03/2003
/CONTACT: Albert Maruggi for BIO-key International, +1-612-325-8126, or
amaruggi@providentpartners.net
/
/Web site: http://www.bio-key.com
http://www.northropgrumman.com
/
(BKYI NOC)
CO: BIO-key International, Inc.; Northrop Grumman
ST: Minnesota
IN: CPR HTS ARO OTC
SU: CON
LH
-- NYW059 --
4836 09/03/2003 07:01 EDT
http://www.prnewswire.com
1) the San Fran lunch-bunch reported that they were made privy to some powerpoint slide which included Wave on a list w/NG & others, at the infamous pre-Intel PR dinner.
2) SKS alluded to NG in the Q3 CC.
3) if the widespread Wave-NDA theorem (pure wavoid conjecture IMO) is accurate, how is it possible that itty-bitty BIO-Key publicly released a September '03 DCIS PR w/NG info & their website linked?
4) if Awk's theory about wavx insider-trading on the NG contract signing was true, why wasn't there similar insider action a year ago prior to the Intel "deal"?!?
5) IMO Zeev's warrant P&D seems much more plausible.
btw, it's been almost 13 months since Wave announced a relationship w/NSM's safekeeper...
i'm confused Zen...
didn't one of the San Fran lunch bunch wavoids report that SKS claimed that Intel Capital doesn't invest in public companies for some yada, yada, yada reason?
If what SKS reportedly claimed was true, then why did Intel invest in Samsung and Micron?
btw, you tried to mix apples & oranges:
1) predicted another 33% from $1.50 & it is well on its way to that outcome.
2) observed that anyone who bought the peak of the P&D last week was down 37% (now 39%) & those losses will eventually exceed 50% IMO.
btw, when does Wave's executive compensation get disclosed?
& why didn't PJS disclose his 500K sale in a Form 4?
& why did he tell the Smart Money reporter that he only sold 100K?
& it sure looks like wavx wants to close at its LOD again...
SO... anyone who bought into the recent phantom P&D at the peak is now down almost 40% in less than a week.
just open those windows and throw out yer money!
http://139.142.147.22/GifChartEngine.dll?interval_day=6&cus=0&indexSymbol=&securityType=...
nice call Zen...
NO - almost four years old.
Wavexpress and Microsoft Demonstrate Datacasting Application at International Broadcasting Convention
September 8, 2000 - Amsterdam, Netherlands - Wavexpress, a new technology company providing broadcast commerce for terrestrial, cable and satellite broadcasters, today announced they are working with Microsoft Corp. to develop advanced digital television software solutions for the PC industry. Wavexpress will provide a live demonstration at the International Broadcasting Convention 2000. The demonstration will couple the Wavexpress datacasting application with Microsoft TV Technologies, yielding a fully integrated end-to-end solution for delivering interactive content and commerce to consumers. The Microsoft TV Technologies is part of the extensive television support being provided in future versions of Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft is providing a next generation driver architecture targeted at digital television applications and is providing critical API functions to support key operations such as network selection, channel tuning, stream de-multiplexing, audio/video decoding, and IP packet extraction. Providing these functions within the core operating system will yield multiple benefits, including a common tuning and stream control model, a modular component architecture, enhanced datacasting support, and the flexibility to seamlessly utilize either hardware or software based transport demultiplex and MPEG decoder solutions.
"A new class of services is emerging from the rapid deployment of digital networks, and Wavexpress provides a compelling multimedia experience uniquely enabled with broadcast commerce," stated Harish Naidu, general manager of the Video and Audio Division at Microsoft. "By exploiting the power and flexibility of Microsoft TV Technologies along with key Microsoft solutions such as Internet Explorer and Windows Media Player, Wavexpress has created an application that showcases the benefits of datacasting in a digital broadcast network."
Wavexpress has developed an innovative broadcast commerce service that combines the power of broadband datacasting with Wave Systems' EMBASSY distributed transaction and rights management system. In leveraging EMBASSY's Trust @ the Edge capabilities with the benefits of a high speed digital broadcast medium, provided via terrestrial, cable or satellite systems, rich multimedia content and a broad range of e-commerce merchandising models will enhance the delivery of the Mass Media Internet.
"By addressing critical system challenges, Microsoft TV Technologies represents a significant step forward in enabling digital television applications on the personal computer," according to Cliff Jenks, CEO of Wavexpress. " The Microsoft TV Technologies initiative provides the key building blocks needed by a PC to support broadcast applications and extends the completeness of our solution by minimizing the complexities associated with processing a high speed data stream."
The Microsoft booth at IBC2000 (321) will include a demonstration of the receipt and processing of a live satellite feed, yielding standard digital television and the Wavexpress enhanced Internet service.
About Wavexpress
A joint venture of Wave Systems Corp. (Nasdaq: WAVX) and Sarnoff Corporation, Wavexpress delivers rich content-movies, music, sports, news, computer games, software-over a digital broadcast signal direct to any DTV-enabled PC. Wavexpress provides a full range of secure data broadcast architecture, infrastructure, and services to broadcasters, content providers and consumers. Unlike competitors, Wavexpress' broadcast e-commerce system offers a variety of business models, including ad-supported content distribution, pay-per-use, purchase transactions, and subscription services. Integrating over $100 million in research and development, Wavexpress capitalizes on the broadcast engineering expertise of Sarnoff, and Wave Systems' EMBASSY technology and back-office systems that handle distributed content protection and transaction reporting functions. For more information, visit the Wavexpress web site at: www.wavexpress.com.
About Wave Systems
Wave Systems' goal is to build a worldwide network of users based on trusted electronic relationships. Trust @ the Edge defines a new architectural model for the Internet which embeds trust and security in every user device. Wave Systems is developing, deploying, and licensing its EMBASSY Trusted Client technology for mass adoption of this revolutionary model. Integrating industry standard functions from a wide range of partners that enable reliable, secure digital exchange and commerce over the Internet. At it's core Wave Systems is building the services and enabling third parties to build services that will take advantage of this new open Trust @ the Edge model. For more information about Wave Systems and Trust @ the Edge, visit: www.wave.com.
Wavexpress Corporate Contact
Simon Tidnam
Wavexpress
212-244-8438
Email: mailto:stidnam@wavexpress.com
http://www.wave.com/news/press_archive/00/000908wavxms.html
btw, nice call Zen...
trusted time?
check the chart chief - here's the posted sell signal for D&O:
click the post to which i've replied - stock was in low $2s for the remainder of that day's session.
4/13/2004 2:47:01 PM
don't own it & don't want to...
but for the brief spike today, it's still lower than the last time i sold it (which was in 2003).
too many other stocks out there -- e.g., have you seen BioKey lately? now that has been a sustained run.
then there are stocks like BioCurex - verrrrry different story.
if this is "real," there needs to be some verification besides "open the windows & let the breeze blow."
wonder who did that concentrated buying at yesterday's close?
enjoy the run - here's another chance D&O.
wavoid math?
@ last check, $2 is 25% higher than $1.60.
s'pose yer PP buddy who paid $1.90 in November is up on his shares too, huh?
hafta agree w/CL to some extent though -- it's a bit surprising that wavx has this sort of stamina (msft dog & pony show is ostensibly helping) w/as much bad news as is currently priced in, although unlike CL, i'm in no way inclined to even consider owning it here...
good luck Zen - wishing you no harm or ill will whatsoever.
khillo -- you think by me pointing out highly suspect trading which looks like it was motivated by some sort of insider info that it means i want to buy?
take a peek at BioCurex & you'll see what i was really referencing.
ciao!
do you deny intimating as much in the post from yahoo?
doesn't take much parsing to interpret that you intended for the reader to believe you had acquired wavx puts.
you wrote:
"...pleased to see Wave use it under the current circumstances."
of course it's better than Series H_ell or death spiral floorless converts -- is anyone suggesting to the contrary?
but it's still ANOTHER $25 million in dilution coming right at yer wavx equity & it also strongly suggests that Snack's rev predictions are pure bunk. it also tends to confirm my long-standing prediction that the Trusted Computing adoption curve is much softer than is admitted round these parts.
& as i just posted, Secondary Offerings dampen the price of existing shares based on my past experience & that company was far stronger than Wave & actually generated hundreds of millions in ann revs.
anyway, i gotta go.
sooooooooo badly?
not quite bud - do i scour the net daily for inklings of impending doom? do i host an anti-wave website? do i have anti-wavx vanity license plates? of gold Fumbler lapel pins? (i do still have that stoopid curly Wave pencil i picked up in L.A., howiever). Do i dream daily of my imminent zillions & world dominion?
i do relish the frequent opportunities to point out all the BS that oozes out of Lee & i do feel somebody needs to check all the wacoid HYPE from time to time & being a fmr kool aid drinking wavaholic, i enough about it & all the missteps of years gone by.
& fwiw, in around 95 or 96, i bought into one such secondary in a company w/generally strong fundamentals & watched the pps decline every day for a week straight.
"Wave of Delusion" has soooooo many meanings.
& wavoids are ridiculously greedy.
& so is Wave mgmt.
100% JMO
edit: where did i say i mastered it?
did you ever cash in those wavx puts you claimed to acquire?
the fact is that i do NOT know all of the minor details of a shelf reg. but i DO know their effect on pps.
so what price did you effectively short wavx 24?
why didn't you disclose it to all yer wavoid buddies?
why didn't Spragues disclose their 2003 compensation?
btw, what is yer opinion of Bushnell's 8 month late Form 4?
or how 'bout the fact that PJS never filed one?
CEO of sub, founder & fmr CEO/Chair of "parent" & holder of the majority of Class B shares... is he required to file a disclosure form as to changes in beneficial ownership.
please 24, school me.
btw, you can call it "predation" all you want, but that don't make it so & my selling in August was better than your shorting wavx around the same time.
SO, what price did you lock in when you bought all those puts?
bolds, IMO it is rather safe to assume that Wave will prolly never do any business w/GROW ever again.
Wave burned GROW w/the $19Mil rev prediction & hasn't had analyst coverage since then.
btw, nice explanation of a typical shelf, but it seems like more are done as "best offorts" than secondaries.
a secondary is usally done in one big block & the market knows a bit in advance that it is coming.
5Mil @ $5 also assumes there won't be heavy retail shorting in the event that wavx does ever get back to that price.
anyway, good luck. i know you have a great deal riding on yer faith in Wave.
Snack, if you think $25M worth of additional dilution is "good news" the Wave story is far worse than i ever imagined.
if they float it as a secondary, it will definitely dampen the pps & if done as one issuance, it will seriously erode the price. the shares will come directly from treas. & avoid the hefty origination costs for highly reputable firms like J.P. Carey -- LOL.
it is a fixed dollar amount & Wave (assuming for arguendo that the SEC will approve the registration) will be free to issue in the quantities they see fit, when they see fit, which will be divided by the price... i know, of course this means 5M shares @ $5 or maybe 1M shares @ $25, or whatever nonsense voids wanna foist...
heck maybe it'll be 1 share for $25,000,000. but no matter how many (or few) it is & @ whatever price they get issued, they will still be competing w/whatever existing shares are at the ask on any given day of issuance.
AND, all of this assumes that Wave will come away from the ongoing formal SEC investigation squeaky clean, which IMO is about as big an IF as there could be, AND given Bushnell's Form 4 filing EIGHT MONTHS after he dumped the shares, the IF gets bigger & bigger & bigger every keefing day. & yes, companies DO issue PRs when SEC investigations conclude, SO, one can presume that Wave is still under the spotlight of the probe & one can only wonder why it is taking so long?!?
This is on top of Senior Sprague saying in the Smart Money article, "Wave of Delusion" that he sold 100K when in fact he sold 500K (according to SEC filings) & on top of the fact that the July/August announcements are now almost 3Qs old & there hasn't even been the sleightest (how's that fer Freudians?) hint of revs AND the Company is now going back to the well again for another $25 mil... oh yeah, then there is the fact that mgmt chose to not disclose their compensation in the 10K. tell me Snack, why would Wave mgmt hide their compensation like this?
SO, thanks for informing me that i don't understand the premise of a shelf registration.
please explain it to me.
by: jvsullivan 03/27/04 01:19 pm
Msg: 52230 of 53397
That's what you're left with?
What if somebody uses puts as insurance when things look bubbly? Still long so still dumb, huh?
------------
no, 24, i am referring to what invariably hauppens after the placement.
just as it has hauppened after every other wavx placement.
the shares are typically placed w/cut throat investors, not wavoids & the vast majority of them end up in the float.
today's announcement will translate into massive dilution & eventually those shares will be dumped on wavoids, after a pump of course!!!
100% JMO.
if true Rach, then why did Seagate take a 25% stake of Sandisk?
that's the wavoid spirit Beachboy!!!
perhaups you were a buyer when you could have been a seller?
perhaups that is the source of yer animus?
perhaups you clicked the link to the post where i gave you a wonderful sell signal?
perhaups yer wavx position is in the red & getting redder by the day?
perhaups i fully understand what a shelf registration is & was referring to what hauppens after such a registration & not the registration itself?
perhaups some voids would have done their bretheren a great service by disclosing the fact that they had taken puts in the summer froth?
perhaups i fully understand that puts don't affect pps in the same way that vanilla shorting does, but that it nevertheless remains a bet that wavx will decline in value?
perhaups there will be another phantom P&D in the offing & instead of buying wavx & dreaming of future riches, you'll be a seller of the losing position you now hold & maybe break even?
perhaups.
nice attack "hamster"
seen Richard Gere lately?!?
gee awk, somehow i've managed to not own it for around six months... no withdrawal, no angst (& no portfolio shaking losses either from wavx collapse).
i've repeatedly reserved the right to be wrong about Wave & its glorious mgmt. if Wave ever does properly assemble their feces & gains actual traction, i would definitely hop on the gravy train.
but fer now, it's dead money IMO except for these mysterious phantom P&Ds.
expect an inevitable test of buck w/out *real* news.
TUXI...
please click on the message to which i've replied here.
that was my sell signal & it was north of $2 in that timeframe.
you coulda made a nice gain on that trade.
& why would i buy wavx today when it'll be 33% cheaper in a week or two?!?
& IF Wave gets the shelf approved, there's as much as $25 MILLION of sell-side pressure coming down the mountain in the next few Qs.
IMO wavx=dead money (at best)
doubt i'll ever own wavx again...
haven't owned it since around Thanskgiving 2003, flipped it once for about a day when BofD bought it.
prior to that, dumped my otherwise full position in AH when it became clear to me that SKS had massively embellished the breakeven in 2004 claim.
& btw, 24, as to yer "predation" contention, note that in the 08/04/03 post you have cut & pasted, i even included a caveat about something to the effect of "...there's some sketchy mgmt stuff..."
whatever -- i dropped it for the first time in 2003 on 8/05 after it repeatedly failed to break & hold above $5 which suggested to me that retail shorts had pounced on it (which was later proven correct).
AND, IMO, anyone that availed themself of my last two calls (directed mainly to D&O b/c i feel bad for him buying my AH shares from around $2.40) has probably done better than the rest of the krew who likely bought into yet another bogus run up. AND i mentioned an entry point w/BKYI a few months ago @ around a buck & has steadily moved to $2.50 since then on *real* contracts that generate actual revs.
i don't hate wavoids & don't wish them ruin.
but let's face it... wavx is one of the most poorly performing stocks in the universe & has about zero market credibility as of today.
& shady things like that concentrated at-the-close buying the day before some mysterious 60% run-up (& subsequent retrace) has gotta raise some serious eyebrows w/the SEC, et al.
btw, Nostra - nice to see you recognize that SKS' remarks about how big companies can't buy stakes in little companies for blah-blah-blah reasons was total BS.
100% JMO
he he he...
guess my call that Wave would be out of cash (again) by end of June was purdy accurate.
hope some voids lightened up during the last phony parabola.
now voids are convincing themselves that MSFT is taking a stake?!?!
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!!!
that's why it's been in full blown tanking mode for two days.
yep, that makes perfect sense.
SO, when will Wave disclose what my three Spragues were paid in 2003?!?!
why didn't they include that disclosure in the audited 10K?
don't own it & don't want to...
but for the brief spike today, it's still lower than the last time i sold it (which was in 2003).
too many other stocks out there -- e.g., have you seen BioKey lately? now that has been a sustained run.
then there are stocks like BioCurex - verrrrry different story.
if this is "real," there needs to be some verification besides "open the windows & let the breeze blow."
wonder who did that concentrated buying at yesterday's close?
enjoy the run - here's another chance D&O.
sleep on it Snack & you can accept the bet tomorrow.
if it's > $100K, you & 24 prevail & HhH & SPIN disappear for a full Q.
$100K or less...
then seek a BofD reshuffling -- i would support that!
btw, your post is an obvious attack IMO.
but i won't TOS
your posting rights don't interest me - oem
edit: sorta like IAMSAM's April Fools?
SO, do ya think Snack will step up & risk being incommunicado for 90 days?
is he confident enough in Wave's offerings that a meager $41K in Q-to-Q rev growth will be a slam dunk for him & silence me for an entire 3 months?!?
of course ICBW, but IMO SAM dumped 100K of wavx recently.
shouldn't it be "you're"?!?
you wrote:
"I know that when this investment takes off (and it will) you and Spin will be back with your pompoms held high. I know Spin has worn out his welcome I can only hope your welcome mat was burned a long with his."
as highly as i doubt Wave succeeding, if they did, you can bet that i'll hop on the gravy train sans pom-poms.
& btw, i never sought to be "welcome."
if you want me gone for a Q, convince Snack to take the wager & pray that Feeney can find a way to properly book > $100K.
edit2: whattaya say Snack, wager?!?
SO Snack, is yer use of bolding supposed to be editorializing in order to somehow analogize that headline w/Wave?
how is this article even remotely relevant to Wave, especially where Dudash's reasoned inquiries regarding Q1 revs are not?
wouldn't it be a great show of wavoid confidence if you were to accept HhH's wager?
90 days posting privileges everywhere.
$100K or less in revs & howie wins.
$100,000.01 & you win.
why not accept the offer?
apparently 24 has already placed his bet.
edit: & to sweeten the pot, i'll throw my posting into the kitty, but only if YOU accept...
edit2: if you do accept, it would also preclude you from sending e-mails to other posters to cut & paste messages from you under their IDs. it would mean 100% Wave radio silence for the losing party.
100%