InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: Snackman post# 38886

Sunday, 04/25/2004 8:33:08 PM

Sunday, April 25, 2004 8:33:08 PM

Post# of 249133
I don't see where I wrote that Wave is/was trying to 'hype' the stock.

I wrote that Wave needed to hype the stock in order to float $25M worth of shares (assuming of course that the SEC eventually approves the application). maybe a subtle semantic difference... maybe not?

SO Snack, you consider my challenge of a claim that Wave has a $5.7M K as hole digging?

please show me something that supports this claim.

if it exists, $5.7M in revs would certainly be good news for Wave, wouldn't it?

if there is nothing to support this claim which at this moment seems to be little more than conjecture, it's merely another day w/the status quo.

not unlike the slog of obtaining DOD approval for the secure signature stuff?

sorry that my reluctance to trust anything Wave makes you sad... IMO it is completely irrational to extend so much trust to a company with a track record such as Wave's.

to each their own i s'pose...


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.