InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: Armp post# 38848

Saturday, 04/24/2004 4:24:27 PM

Saturday, April 24, 2004 4:24:27 PM

Post# of 249133
Armp it seems you might be miffed by the question.

please provide a cogent explanation for why Wave has never PRed any Defense Cross-credentialing Identification System (DCIS) relationship w/NG, yet are supposedly involved w/this particular DOD initiative.

if Wave was involved, maybe awk's speculation would be sensical, but when other companies PRed their NG-DCIS relationship almost eight months ago & all wavoids can point to are:

1) some blah, blah, blah from SKS in a CC (noting he has used GE, GM & many other major corps as examples of those who would might buy the "cool" things Wave provides) &

2) some second-hand reports of a purported powerpoint slide from the lunch-bunch (nevermind the possible Reg FD implications of sharing such seemingly material non-public info w/a select few voids at a SF restaurant)

for years & years, voids have claimed that all these incredible developments were behind the curtain of NDAs, yet little if anything has materialized publicly.

it really takes another leg out of the supposed NDA table IMO.

why is this any different than the multitude of similar past predictions?

BIO-Key PRed a DCIS deal w/NG last September - where is Wave's similar announcement?

tia

PS disclosure - have traded BKYI but am not currently long.

PPS did Wave ever successfully resubmit the secure signature software to the DOD?



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.