what a web, seems to be the same Huffman involved (or once involved) in the Tampa "alt energy business"......(fugitive) John Stanton, John Rivera, et al:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=168211


PS: the "dead body" wake includes many Cos....

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=51242919

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.aspx?boardID=6025&srchyr=2010&SearchStr=huffman

thanks for that link, BTW:

PS: "sign of relief????"....strange wording, IMO....

EDITORIAL: Coal-to-diesel plant fuels optimism


Comments
0
Email
Share

Messenger-Inquirer, Owensboro, Ky.
August 29, 2012, 2:34 a.m.
Muhlenberg County officials are breathing a sigh of relief with last week's announcement of a coal-to-diesel plant that will be built near Central City.

More than four years ago, the Muhlenberg County Fiscal Court invested $625,000 of its single-county coal severance funds in an effort to secure what was originally a $400 million project.

For a minute, it appeared as the funds -- appropriated to help the company with design and engineering costs -- were spent in vain.

Although the coal-to-diesel plant has been dramatically scaled back to a $76 million construction plan, the promise that was made in 2008 is now becoming a reality.

U.S. Fuel Corp. is building its first coal-to-diesel plant that will consume 148 tons of coal daily to produce 8,500 gallons of low-sulfur, high-grade diesel fuel. The project is expected to create 300 construction jobs and employ 50 once operational.

And that should be good economic news for Muhlenberg County, which as of a year ago was experiencing an employment rate of 10.2 percent.

But there are other significant factors that will come with this state-of-the-art facility.

As the future of coal is being challenged through EPA regulations and cheaper natural gas prices, this proposed plant provides a cleaner use for the fossil fuel.

It involves technology that enables the coal to be liquefied into a viable fuel source without producing wastewater or emissions such as carbon dioxide.

Moreover, this could be a step toward energy independence. With success, there is potential for expansion not only for this facility but it could lead to other similar fuel-generating plants.

"What I'm excited about is that it's a pilot program," Judge-Executive Rick Newman said. "If these guys can come in here and produce diesel fuel at the price they said they could a few years ago, I don't see how it can fail."

We share Newman's optimism because the progress this company makes can help guide the rest of the country in how to better use our natural resources without the environmental effects and provide the energy self-reliance that we've been waiting for. ___

(c)2012 the Messenger-Inquirer (Owensboro, Ky.)

Visit the Messenger-Inquirer (Owensboro, Ky.) at http://www.messenger-inquirer.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

"What I'm excited about is that it's a pilot program," Judge-Executive Rick Newman said. "If these guys can come in here and produce diesel fuel at the price they said they could a few years ago, I don't see how it can fail."

"they" don't "fail", that's the point.....it's the people who fund them through retail stock purchases and "never look back" that do......no free lunch:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero%E2%80%93sum_game

PS:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64757071&txt2find=Newman

and

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67313701&txt2find=Newman


Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, through the Muhlenberg County Fiscal Court has direct ownership of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in U.S. Fuel Corporation, formerly known as Nuclear Solutions, Inc.

The shares reside at Old National Bank in the name of Muhlenberg County Fiscal Court and are under the direct supervision of The Honorable Rick Newman, Muhlenberg County, Kentucky Judge-Executive.

wonder how Muhlenberg feels about being diluted????....what the HELL is going on over there, a "ground breaking" sideshow, 2M shares, etc, etc

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1116112/000139834411002175/fp0003477_8k.htm

from the same filing 11 months ago.....not the plurality of "reports", and the usual "near future" hazy carrot.....

Item 8.01 Other Events

The company is taking steps to bring all periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission up to date in order to become a fully compliant and reporting issuer in the near future. This month, the company met with its independent certifying accountants, RBSM, LLP and agreed to a plan for providing all required financial reporting disclosures including all 10-K annual reports and 10-Q quarterly reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company will periodically update shareholders on its efforts to again become a fully reporting public company.

Dated: September 21, 2011

and some seem to have dedicated their lives to scamming people.....

so sorry I am not part of that esteemed group.....but let's look forward, since it's not like society is concerned with things such as the past.....let's not have rap sheets for criminals, or distinguished awards for heroes, etc, etc, etc, because that all took place in THE PAST....

"hey officer, gimmie a break, that arrest warrant was for something I did in THE PAST!!!!!"

"sorry soldier, give us back that medal, your act of courage was too far in THE PAST"....

too absurd....

and he certainty is NOT Jared.....unless Jared is into harshly criticizing himself in public......

and for any necessary MATERIAL EVENT ONLY!

is a lawsuit "a MATERIAL EVENT"??????

just livin' in a material world.......

well said.......we can't give specific examples here, and PO the message board gods, but it's pretty easy to see that it ain't no "professionals accumulating" when price goes down, along with volume.....

there are countless examples of declining volume and price, takes about 8 seconds to find some....less liquidity is never a good thing, IMO.....

Volume decreasing with float increasing is very common in hype driven stocks.

wow, here's an idea......

since these machines are SO CHEAP to make and run, footprint is so small, etc, etc.....the hell with worrying about getting duty cycle up from 75% PER PROCESSOR to 90%, whatever.....

just make a few extra processors (25% more), some run while others are cleaned.... Problem Solved, processors can run commercially for now with NO changes needed.....this also adds some "safety factor" production redundancy for a site.....

processor evolution and improvement can also be done with little disruption of commercial operations, since there are spare machines.....

there used to be a few "vent" boards, but now most (all???) are "closed":

ex:

The THE_ASYLUM board has been closed to further posting

The Middle School Playground board has been closed to further posting

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=24840391

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61393905


HELLO ALL ADMINS,
This may be a no nonsense suggestion. However I notice to many people being banned/restricted from boards. May I suggest a IHUB HASH IT OUT room. I know all boards are to beg the differ be good or bad. And a jail room is already avaiable.. But instead of going to jail maybe just go to the boxing ring to hash out differs.LOL sounds kinda good to me. I know none of us should bash each other and this maybe a way to resolve our differences. Again just a thought.


The Parking Lot was a board for that purpose and it ended up being a failure because people were out of control.

etc, etc....

US Fuel has been told by OTC that upon its determination that all disclosures and filing are sufficient, it may take about a week for the Caveat Emptor designation to be removed.

"all disclosures and filings" are not just one 10-Q!!!!.....10-Ks are more important than 10-Qs...also, "about a week"????....are they being "fast tracked" again???

Generally, OTC Markets will remove the Caveat Emptor designation once the security meets the qualifications for Current Information and we are satisfied that there is no longer a public interest concern, typically no sooner than 30 days. In the case of reverse mergers, OTC Markets will remove the Caveat Emptor designation upon qualification for Current Information or, for SEC filers, with the submission of a super 8-K, with no 30 day minimum.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/otc-101/caveat-emptor

according to the OTCMarkets site, it takes more than just not filing to get the CE label...so while they "admit to not filing" (really???...we hadn't noticed!!!) what about the below concerning promotion???:

OTC Markets believes adequate current information must be publicly available during any period when a security is the subject of ongoing promotional activities having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities in the OTC market. As a matter of policy, when it has come to the attention of OTC Markets that a security has been the subject of promotional activities and adequate current information concerning the issuer is not publicly available, OTC Markets will label a security as "Caveat Emptor." Promotional activities may include spam email, unsolicited faxes or news releases, whether they are published by the issuer or a third party.

there are plenty of non-filers without the CE label, which has been discussed here previously......for example, USFF is in the "limited info" category, but the below stock is in NO INFO (worse), yet only has a stop sign, and no CE status....maybe because there was not the above mentioned promotion also????:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ONCP/quote

PS: don't get me started about the 8-Ks for events over a year old, or defaulted NV business license.....any peep on that???

looks like we are back in "trade 'em if you got 'em" mode, part 6 (I lost count!!!)

I wonder if his friend count has been dropping????

PS: nice tie......maybe stick to the hoodies, Mark!!!!

Zuckerberg at the 37th G8 summit in 2011

NTIC, no volume to speak of for some time now, but I am keeping an eye open on this one for an entry point.....it will probably be a boring wait, for a boring Co, but when/if it cycles back up again could be some decent % profits.....

http://investorshub.advfn.com/Northern-Technologies-International-Corporation-NTIC-17783/

yeah, that was ugly......I remember all the arguments that the R/S was not bad, since C was a big board, etc.....but 5 pre-slit had some fierce resistance, so I didn't see why that would change much afterwards.....

BTW, never been a big fan of C the Co, but made some real nice coin before the split when I was trading 10K lots in the (about) 3-4 range on a regular basis.....some easy scalping on that one.....

(maybe I just got lucky, who knows)...

the hype leading up to the IPO was shameless, IMO.....they knew FB had a huge base of users, and preyed on the fact that "since everyone uses FB, it MUST be a great Co to own shares in"!!!!


thus, a base of umpteen unsophisticated retail investors clamoring for a piece of the Golden Calf ("give us your gold, we will make a god for you"!!!), while the street laughs all the way to the bank selling them cold stone....

their filings are a bitch to go through, since I ain't no banker!!!

don't see it mentioned yet who the buyer(s) are, and it's not exactly exciting reading!!!!

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/c/sec-filings

PS: FWIW

The notes are senior unsecured obligations of Citigroup Funding Inc. All payments due on the notes, including the repayment of principal, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup Inc., Citigroup Funding Inc.’s parent company. All payments due on the notes are subject to the credit risk of Citigroup Inc.

lol, like with this one below, with CNBC, et al, hyping the crap out of the IPO for MONTHS????

when all analyst say buy that means WARNING TO BUYERS

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79144972

not the common, but some notes:

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=54013696

I don't think it will ever be THAT severe, just a way over-priced IPO that funneled more money up the pyramid, and tons of discounted shares hitting the market....

in other words, business as usual on Wall Street.....

yet he had no issue feeding at the public equity trough.....

social mission completed: more wealth transferred up the pyramid!!!

Facebook's social mission is more important to Mark Zuckerberg than Facebook's business
Facebook's business exists to support Facebook's product development, not the other way around

Facebook's social mission is more important to Mark Zuckerberg than Facebook's business
Facebook's business exists to support Facebook's product development, not the other way around

It’s Becoming Clear That No One Actually Read Facebook’s IPO Prospectus or Mark Zuckerberg’s Letter to Shareholders

By Henry Blodget | Daily Ticker – 28 minutes ago
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/becoming-clear-no-one-actually-read-facebook-ipo-160120121.html#more-id

Editor's Note: This post originally appeared on Business Insider

As Facebook's (FB) stock continues to collapse, the volume of whining is increasing.

Four months ago, you will recall, Facebook was viewed as "the next Google." Now, with no major change in the fundamentals, it's viewed as an overhyped disaster. Meanwhile, there is ever-louder grumbling that 26-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is in over his head and should be relieved of command.

As I listen to all this whining, I have a simple question:

Didn't anyone even read Facebook's IPO prospectus?

The answer, I can only assume, is "no."

Because if anyone had read the Facebook IPO prospectus, they would have learned, among other things, the following:
Facebook's growth rate was decelerating rapidly
Facebook's user-base was rapidly transitioning to mobile devices, which produce much less revenue
Facebook's operating profit margin was already an astounding 50%, which suggested it had nowhere to go but down
Facebook's CEO had a nearly unprecedented amount of control over the company.
Facebook's CEO had set up this astounding level of control intentionally. Mark Zuckerberg knew all about how impatient public-market shareholders are. And he set up the whole company so he would never have to pay attention to their whining.
In the 9 months following the IPO, insiders would be free to sell more than 2 billion shares of Facebook that they had been holding for years
Facebook was going public at an astoundingly high price for a company with these characteristics--about 60-times the following year's projected earnings, in a market in which other hot tech companies like Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) were trading at less than 15-times.

Even more importantly, if anyone had read the IPO prospectus, they also would have learned the following, all of which was expressed in a letter written directly to prospective shareholders by CEO Mark Zuckerberg:
Facebook's social mission is more important to Mark Zuckerberg than Facebook's business
Facebook's business exists to support Facebook's product development, not the other way around
Facebook's CEO is an extremely patient man who does not flinch under criticism
Facebook will never care as much about clients and shareholders as it does about its service and users
Facebook cares about the long term, not the short term (read: decades, not months).

Facebook shareholders may be annoyed by those facts, especially now that the value of their stakes are getting demolished.

But they can't say that they weren't warned.

And they also can't say that the stock has been unduly punished:

At $18, using the correct share count (2.7 billion), Facebook is still valued at almost $50 billion. And it's still trading at ~28-times next year's projected earnings of $0.65, an estimate that looks just as likely to be too high as it is to be too low. Meanwhile, Apple is still trading at less than 15-times projected earnings. So you can't argue that Facebook is now "too cheap."

Lastly, if Facebook shareholders really think Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is going to cave to their whining and step down now, all of four months after he told them that he only cared about the long term (which, again, is measured in decades, not months), they don't know Mark Zuckerberg.

Again, Mark Zuckerberg set up the entire structure of the company so he wouldn't be forced to make dumb short-term decisions by whining public-market shareholders.

And he TOLD them that he wasn't going to make those decisions.

They just didn't listen.

In the interests of "better late than never," I've attached an annotated version of Mark Zuckerberg's letter.

If you've already read it, here's what else you should know about Facebook's stock--especially Facebook employees.
http://www.businessinsider.com/dear-facebook-employees-heres-the-truth-about-your-stock-price-2012-8


http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/becoming-clear-no-one-actually-read-facebook-ipo-160120121.html#more-id

hey, I just did a C/P, feel free to contact Mr Klein if you think the story needs more info....

http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Guestbook.php

BTW, I didn't see where any of this was said on the "fugitive" site, true or not:

Stanton maybe a share holder in USEI but that does not make him a control officer . He does not own it and he does not run it.

vs:

This Is A Possible Pump And Dump Scam Operation Being Run By Associates Of John Stanton

http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Home_Page.html

who mentioned New Jersey????

point was, all I saw was defamation in that photo, and since I only READ the MBs, I was wondering why someone mentioned slander ????.....

(kind of like someone ELSE knowing weeks ago that "a package was coming").....

PS: since a US state was brought up by you, it reminds me of something from another board:

I wonder if this was brought in Canada to avoid anti-SLAPP problems?

http://lawiscool.com/2011/10/06/renewing-the-debate-on-anti-slapp-legislation-in-ontario/


Although NY's Anti-Slapp laws seem tightly defined, they might apply:

"To use New York's anti-SLAPP law, you must show two things. First, you must show that the plaintiff suing you is a "public applicant or permittee." Second, you must show that the plantiff's claim against you is an "action involving public petition and participation." The statute defines a "public applicant or permittee" as an individual or entity that has obtained or is seeking "a permit, zoning change, lease, license, certificate or other entitlement for use or permission to act from any government body." The term could include real estate developers, mining companies, garment manufacturers, and private landowners looking to build new structures on their land, among others. In essence, to meet this requirement, you will have to show that the party suing you requires some sort of government license to operate or proceed with a project.

The statute defines an "action involving public petition and participation" as one that involves a public applicant or permittee (above) seeking damages from a defendant on the basis of the defendant's efforts "to report on, comment on, rule on, challenge or oppose" the application to the government. For example, the definition would include a garment manufacturer's lawsuit against a public interest organization campaigning to have the manufacturer's state registration revoked. For another, the definition would include a real estate developer's lawsuit against a blogger who reported on the developer's attempts to secure a building permit, or who called upon local citizens to oppose the application?"

http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/anti-slapp-law-new-york

Venue could be an issue.....I think that there are 2 countries involved.

Attention Anyone Doing Penny Stock Business With ROUNDER (RNDR) or United States Energy (USEI)

This Is A Possible Pump And Dump Scam Operation Being Run By Associates Of John Stanton - Be Warned That Any Money Invested Could Be Going To A Fugitive From Justice And You Could Lose Your Money!

http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Home_Page.html

Updated : September 1, 2012

Attention Anyone Doing Penny Stock Business With ROUNDER (RNDR) or United States Energy (USEI)

This Is A Possible Pump And Dump Scam Operation Being Run By Associates Of John Stanton - Be Warned That Any Money Invested Could Be Going To A Fugitive From Justice And You Could Lose Your Money!

http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Home_Page.html

Updated : September 1, 2012

more information on that, please.....is that from a filing showing ownership or something like that????

(or a weird way of showing the dividend yield???....based on the float, maybe???)

OK, fair enough.....is this a permanent board closure, or just a "cool off"???

why was not just banning the offenders appropriate, as was warned????

(and yes, I have an occasional deleted post there, 4 in the last 2 weeks or so)

PS: I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but already see a lot of rumors flying.....you know the drill, Ihub is "in on it", (they closed the board to cover up, yada, yada).....why feed the conspiracy lunatics???

"NJ Defamation" is "slander AND libel"????

why is he listed for the defendants then????

And what is really odd is the name after the defendants - Frederick Hawa - he doesn't represent the defendants does he???? He is the same lawyer from Canada that sued IHUB in that suit I just mentioned. How weird.

(from another board)

The JBI Inc. board has been closed to further posting.

seems unfair to punish everyone by closing a board for whatever happened there by others:

Zero tolerance is the policy going forward so you'll want to be sure your messages are civil in nature and strictly comply with the site's rules. Sanctions will be swiftly imposed upon those who elect to ignore this warning.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75450000

this 8-K says the "authorized" is 800M common and 50M preferred.....

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=53909371


RESOLVED, that the corporation will have authority to issue Eight Hundred Fifty Million (850,000,000) shares of stock in the aggregate. These shares will be divided into two classes. The number of authorized common shares in the Articles of Incorporation is changed to 800,000,000 (Eight Hundred Million) shares authorized with a par value of $.0001, and the number of preferred shares is changed to 50,000,000 (Fifty Million) shares authorized with a par value of $.001

I believe the NV SOS also shows that.....

a bit of novelty in those chambers, but I don't really see the point of some of them......

much of the review of the other calibers was "cheaper ammo"....why not just get a handgun that was designed for cheaper ammo to begin with???.....there are plenty of fine 9mm out there, why would someone want to put that in a 1911 that costs more than many others chambered and optimized for 9mm?????....

the .357 is kind of interesting though, but rimmed ammo in a clip would not be my choice.... no matter what is claimed about jamming, why take the chance???

anyway thanks for the interesting article......

unlike tulips though, this Co makes some of the world's best selling products......and has more money than many countries!!!

do I expect it to go up every trading day???....nope, but still room left to rise overall, IMO 750 will print by EOY......probably sooner.....

The company cannot be fraudulent, people are fraudulent

want to bet on that one????.....BOTH can be fraudulent....but only people can be criminals....


Since 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a number of complaints related to the aiding and abetting of securities fraud. For example, CIBC and Merrill Lynch were separately charged with aiding and abetting Enron’s evasion of record keeping requirements and required financial controls. Settlements, including disgorgement, penalties, and interest reached $80 million in both cases.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiding_and_abetting

We could of used that sponge down here where people have to wash off their boats immediately after pulling it from the lake.

yeah, because they had a monopoly on sponges, and had cornered the world sponge and soap market, I forgot.....how will the masses wash their boats, cars, and pet bowls now, the loss is tragic!!!!!

PS: maybe a tell-all movie is in order "Who Killed the Presoaped Sponge?"

yeah, so what????......bigger scams than the SPNG have gone down, having a "real product" (with like 99% faked SPNG sales, according to the case).....scam management and books doesn't exactly make the SEC or DOJ happy campers:

ask WHY (the Enron slogan!!!!)

Enron Corporation (former NYSE ticker symbol ENE) was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000.[1] Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known as the Enron scandal. Enron has since become a popular symbol of willful corporate fraud and corruption. The scandal also brought into question the accounting practices and activities of many corporations throughout the United States and was a factor in the creation of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. The scandal also affected the wider business world by causing the dissolution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron

working fine on Chrome....

PS: have a good one

great, I'll buy back if it gets to 25 or so!!!!

STX. Seeking Alpha. Why Seagate Looks More Compelling Than Apple
August 27, about: STX, includes: AAPL, SDY
http://seekingalpha.com/article/831061-why-seagate-looks-more-compelling-than-apple

Seagate Technology (STX) is a $13.53 billion large-cap Ireland-based company that manufactures hard disk drives. In addition to being used in desktop and notebook computers, Seagate's products are also used in enterprise servers, mainframes, workstations, DVRs, game consoles, personal data backup systems, portable external storage systems, and digital media systems. The company also provides various data storage services.

Seagate has a compelling undervaluation with a trailing P/E ratio of 5.25, a forward P/E ratio of 4.88, and a PEG of 0.16. The stock price has not kept pace with the company's earnings. This is a positive characteristic as the stock will continue to gravitate toward the company's earnings growth.

The company has a high profit margin of 19.16% and an operating margin of 20.98%. For the past 12 months, Seagate has pulled in $3.26 billion in operating cash flow and $1.61 billion in free cash flow. The company has 1.87 times more current assets than current liabilities.

Although the company missed earnings estimates by 4% in its most recent quarter, it beat estimates for the previous three quarters. The company also had record revenue of $4.5 billion and record shipments of 66 million units for the quarter. This comprised a market share of approximately 42%.

Seagate is expected to grow earnings annually at a high rate of 28.28% for the next five years. When you combine the company's generous dividend of 3.8%, investors have the potential to triple the performance of the average S&P 500 company. If this 32% CAGR is realized by reinvesting dividends, a $10,000 investment in Seagate could be worth $40,000 in five years.

Seagate currently looks more compelling than Apple (AAPL) in terms of valuation and growth. Let's take a look at a side-by-side comparison of these two companies.

Granted, the two companies are different in terms of the type of technology that they produce. However, when we compare them as potential investments, what matters is a good entry point and the potential earnings growth. When looking at valuation in terms of P/E and PEG ratios, we can see that Seagate presents a much lower valuation than Apple. Since Seagate is operating in the eurozone, the stock has been unfairly suppressed and has not caught up to its earnings growth. Apple also tends to grow earnings at a faster rate than its stock appreciation rate, keeping it undervalued.

Seagate's dividends are more than twice as generous as Apple's. With a 3.8% dividend, Seagate's yield is even higher than the SPDR S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (SDY) average of 3.22%. However, Seagate has not been as consistent as the dividend aristocrats in raising dividends over time. Therefore, the stock should be viewed more as a growth company than a dividend-paying company, in my opinion.

It is quite compelling for both Apple and Seagate to be undervalued and also have expected earnings growth above 20%. Some may argue that Apple's expected growth of 22.26% is too low, and that may turn out to be true. If Seagate can achieve its expected annual growth of 28.28%, the stock should continue to perform well. Seagate's stock performance may even surpass Apple's stock performance since it currently has a lower valuation and a higher expected earnings growth rate. Overall, both companies should continue to perform well above average for the next five years. With Apple getting a lot of attention in the investing world, I thought that Seagate also deserves a serious look.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

David Zanoni.

(courtesy of PoemStone, who brought this to my attention)

it's been an amazing run.....kind of ironic that the Thai floods were the catalyst......