Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I wonder what Tony will say about this. More to the point, what will he DO?
He was always spouting off about monetizing his supposed $70M cache of Sumcoin. Shouldn't this be his chance to do just that?
Sumcoin Wallet
@SumcoinWallet
·
7m
#Sumcoin news
Sumcoin Marketplace Opens Today, June 18 2025: Revolutionizing Peer-to-Peer Crypto Trading
https://prlog.org/13083033-sumcoin-marketplace-opens-today-june-18-2025-revolutionizing-peer-to-peer-crypto-trading.html
Why aren't you guys buying shares at $.0001?
There's a way to do things and I see you figured it out!! You can talk politics but that other stuff I can't relate!!
Debanking nearly killed tech — but Congress and Trump can save it
Debank, deplatform and unplug.
These were the watchwords of the Biden White House.
The outgoing administration wreaked havoc on industries it disfavored by cutting access to three critical chokepoints: money, information and energy. Federal bureaucrats used underhanded tactics to stifle emerging tech, like artificial intelligence (AI) and crypto. Among President-elect Trump’s top priorities should be lifting the stranglehold to resuscitate American innovation.
So vast was the regulatory overreach of the Biden administration that it led to the creation of new words. Debanking was foremost among them.
In a stunning interview with Joe Rogan last month, a16z co-founder Marc Andreesen revealed that he worked with 30 tech founders whose bank accounts were shuttered after federal regulators pressured financial institutions to deny services to digital asset companies, and others it deemed politically problematic, in the name of improving “safety and soundness.”
The administration’s most ruthless hitman in this endeavor was the FDIC, which threatened penalties against any bank that held more than 15 percent of its deposits from digital asset companies. The agency then tightened its chokehold by sending letters to multiple banks directing them to “pause all crypto activities.”
The government crackdown on crypto, which has become known as “Operation Chokepoint 2.0,” left countless companies without bank accounts in the United States. It drove dozens of startups out of business and forced others offshore.
Sadly, the debanking scandal was part of the Biden administration’s efforts to disempower voices, journalists and industries it disliked. Remember that before debanking, there was deplatforming. As the Twitter Files revealed, the White House and its surrogates applied significant pressure on social media companies to ban and censor opinions that violated the government narrative during the COVID pandemic.
But it wasn’t just political pundits and journalists the Biden administration threatened to deplatform; it was entire realms of mathematics.
After Andreesen laid bare the disturbing details of the debanking scandal, he related a meeting he had in May with White House officials about AI development. In this meeting, Andreesen reported that Biden aides warned him against funding AI startups because they would ultimately fail. Why? Because the administration intended to create a regulatory moat around a few select AI companies that, in turn, it would be able to control.
The officials even boasted that, if necessary, government could control development of AI by classifying entire areas of mathematics, just as it had classified entire areas of physics during the Cold War. In short, the Biden administration threatened to make certain fields of math illegal to the public, all in an effort to expand its influence.
Incredibly, the administration’s censoriousness didn’t stop at threats to ban math. After seeking to limit opponents’ access to money and information, the administration set its sights on a new attack vector: energy.
The target? Bitcoin.
In 2022, the White House issued an executive order expressing enthusiasm for a government-controlled central bank digital currency, or CBDC. It paired this action with a white paper that proposed policies to “limit or eliminate” Bitcoin mining in the United States.
The administration later made good on this threat by pushing for a 30 percent excise tax on the electricity used by miners. And in 2024, it imposed a mandatory energy audit on all large Bitcoin miners across the United States. The overreach was so blatantly illegal that Bitcoin companies sued the administration — and won.
The intent of all these actions was clear: to centralize control of digital assets and “unplug” Bitcoin miners from the grid. The administration sought to limit miners’ access to energy in the same way it had limited their access to money. Like debanking, “unplugging” was part and parcel of the White House’s efforts to exploit critical chokepoints to control emerging industries.
The good news: President-elect Trump and his newly appointed AI and crypto czar David Sacks can help end the chokepoint operations once and for all.
They should start by investigating the agencies behind the debanking scandal — principally, the FDIC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the prudential regulatory arm of the Federal Reserve. Exposing corruption within these agencies and holding bad-faith bureaucrats to account is essential to prevent weaponization of the banking system in the future. Trump’s team must ensure that banking is neutral and immune from politicization by implementing laws and regulations mandating fair access to financial services for legal activities.
While the Biden administration used energy as a chokepoint in an attempt to suffocate the Bitcoin ecosystem, the Trump administration should take the opposite course. It can do this by researching and publicizing the benefits of partnerships between Bitcoin miners and energy producers, which can lead to more generation, less wasted power and more resilient grids.
Forging a partnership between power producers and miners is key to achieving what Trump calls “energy dominance.” Becoming energy dominant will help our country scale power generation to new levels, which will also ensure that the United States remains the world’s leader in AI. To complement these efforts, the new administration should also help Congress pass a comprehensive crypto framework, providing the regulatory clarity the industry needs to bring innovation and investment back home.
The Biden administration sought to suffocate our most promising technologies by choking access to money, information and energy. But the stranglehold ends on Jan. 20. Trump and Sacks can breathe new life into AI and crypto with a pro-innovation agenda that champions new technologies instead of suppressing them.
Wave I can't participate in this foolishness!! Get a clue!! You're the dummy not Me!!
Acme, he doesn't believe Biden killed USEI with his de-banking of crypto companies directive.
Slo life is GOOD!! It's just money I'm going to get it back 2 fold!!
No one needed a crystal ball to see that USEI was a loser. You were taken in by a huckster. But I'm glad you can still laugh at your lame retorts.
👇 You should have let me borrow your crystal ball that has allowed you to be a billionaire that posts on ihub!! LOL 😂
It's interesting how you can post nonsense to me while wallowing in a dead ticker sitting as worthless at $.000001 and Tony's nowhere to be found. Just think, if you had sold at any point before it went to worthless, you could have put whatever you were able to salvage from this disaster into another play and maybe even recouped your losses. Maybe you'd even be thanking me for helping you make that decision.
👇 All I know is if we come back Slo gets no sleep!! LOL 😂 I'm using every comment just for him!!
If I were bullish on a ticker that I could buy at $.0001, I would. So why are we not seeing buys at $.0001?
Sarcasm. I love it. 😉
Woo Hoo... lot of action here today.
Your skill in holding a Miller ticker from the $.001 range to $.000001 is truly impressive. We're all in awe. 😒
You mean along with about 6 more like that?? Yes!! I didn't cry when I was over a million bucks so why would I now!! It's the skill that's important!! Learn something!!
Ouch. That's gotta hurt.
I own 50 million shares!! Need I say more??
Yes Slo I didn't make any money!! You are all knowing but you hoover around dead tickers to warn people!! Is that about right?? Look into your crystal ball and tell me my account balance!! Lol 😂
Btw, you haven't told me what your bid is on USEI. Averaging down at $.000001 is a good move if what you say about it coming together holds merit. And if you actually believe that, put your money where your mouth is.
LOL That was hilarious!
You're right in that I don't "invest" in OTC tickers. Especially ones run by serial failures with business plans that have never earned a penny. You apparently do but didn't do a lick of DD on Miller and are now paying the price for that laziness.
I've tried warning people about Miller for years. Many students, like yourself, sometimes sleep through class.
Portfolios are like puzzles!! Something a non investor like yourself wouldn't understand!! When something isn't working you go to the other side!! Eventually it comes together!! Class dismissed!!
Well, the winner certainly isn't the person holding shares of a dead ticker at $.000001. I tried to warn you. But walls don't have very good hearing.
So, where is your bid at?
I knew you just couldn't admit it!! Something you didn't think of!! And the Winner 🥇 Is!!
So what? 😆
It's like taking to the wall.
Good luck with USEI. Btw, are you buying at $.000001? A million shares only costs $1.
It's a difference!! So what?? Do you have any idea what news Big Tony could announce?? NO!! Now a rational person would say no but let's hear it!! Lol 😂
Oh, but I am doing good for mankind. I'm trying to get people to understand how the OTC works and what's possible. But more importantly what's not, and why.
Do you refute the points I made about the differences between the two tickers? Or do you simply find it easier to deflect from the issue?
👇 Why haven't you taken this knowledge of the future and done something good for mankind instead of typing on a message board?? Lol 😂
No, it can't.
The lowest that ticker ever got to was $.0005 whereas USEI has been at $.000001 for over two years now. And they've been reporting their fins all along, whereas USEI hasn't submitted anything in over 4 years.
Another 100K dump out of an account.
Btw, 1M shares at $.000001 equates to $1. Do you have any bids in at $.000001, energy? How about at $.0001?
No. Not a trade. It was a million share dump out of an account to an MM at $.000001 as a worthless security who will now try and find a sucker willing to pay $.0001 for them, which is the lowest a retail trade can go off at.
We've been over this, energy. Just because you want it to be so, doesn't mean it is.
Another million share trade.
You can make all the excuses in the world for Tony's failures to do anything with USEI but the reality is staring you right in the face.
On the Expert Market at $.000001. That's not looking at things from a negative perspective. The facts speak for itself.
It takes a special kind of person to always look at things from a negative perspective!! That's not me!! Many of the legacy CEO'S have to adjust to the new structure!! He just needs to partner up with someone with a real business and explain to them the advantages of going public!!
The question isn't "when".
USEI sent Sumcoin to the BMCS exchange. Biden killed it. They have something coming, imo. Tony said in the filing he is selling the remainder of Sumcoin.
USEI has value just on that. USEI has money due from BMCS in some form, imo.
Besides, when BMCS moves up it takes USEI with it in the form of valuable restricted shares that increase in value as BMCS increases.
This week we should see the quarterly filed.
Maybe soon we get an update from either company. I suspect Tony was out of the US on business. Hopefully, business that will enhance both companies.
You mean Chime? Sad, isn't it? If he collects a penny from continually hyping that, it would be more than he's ever achieved with USEI. Meanwhile shareholders haven't heard a peep from him as to the plans to do anything with USEI, now that everything's been stripped out and sent over to BMCS.
"Shareholders own the company, not the CEO" Nice thought, but it doesn't make a difference to an OTC CEO. They do what they damn well please and ignore the shareholders. Tony doesn't care that you've reminded him that you're still here. Like me, he's just wondering why you're still here.
Big Tony is over on X advertising a trading app!! I remind him we're still here!!
Of course, by that you mean cleaning up their account by dumping shares out of it. Yeah, it must be painful to have to those worthless shares there year after year.
Looks like someone may be cleaning up shares.
Slo I'm sure you punched a clock so you have no idea how important it is to strike when the iron is Hot!! Self preservation is rule #1!! He did the best he could and he still has an opportunity to make things right!! It takes years for an investment to become profitable!! Stay on the sidelines he's going to make something happen!!
Just wanted to hear you say it.
Diluting the stock to line his pocket while he continued to lose money for the company and the shareholders.
4 years later, nothing has changed except the share price which is now as low as a share price can go.
But keep supporting him, Acme. It' s how these failures continue to soak naive investors while making a living off them.
Biden killed USEI with his (or Obama's) de-bank crypto company directive.
I'm sure he saw his stock rising just like we all did!! When that happens you sell shares!! Duh!!
The questions was .... "How did Tony make money in '21?"
Not when.
Whatever year it was 20/21!!
Whatever year it was 20/21!!
How did Tony make money in '21?
Followers
|
554
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
50389
|
Created
|
06/12/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
CONTACT INFORMATION
INVESTOR RELATIONS
STOCK SYMBOL: (USEI-OTC)
EMAIL: info@usenergyinitiatives.com
WEBSITE: www.usenergyinitiatives.com
TWITTER: @USEnergyinit
PHONE: 661.537.4822
LOCATION: WOODLAND HILLS, CA.
SOURCE: US Energy Initiatives Corp, Inc.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |