is still alive and kicking.....Happy 2018!!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stanton indictments unsealed today!!!!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79418631
Stanton held without bail:
(and other tidbits, he may have hidden his wealth in a complex web of companies with the help of friends and business associates )
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79418631
let's hope the law moves nice and slow for a change!!!....
He eventually will be transferred to federal custody in Tampa.
how about waiting as long as he ran, that sounds fair!!!!
PS: when he was caught, they said he would possibly be transferred today...now it has become "eventually".....there might be more to this than meets the eye......
here's to the "poster-child" of lots of other things!!!
let's hope the law moves nice and slow for a change!!!....
He eventually will be transferred to federal custody in Tampa.
how about waiting as long as he ran, that sounds fair!!!!
PS: when he was caught, they said he would possibly be transferred today...now it has become "eventually".....there might be more to this than meets the eye......
here's to the "poster-child" of lots of other things!!!
thanks for your updates.....not sure how a person in jail gets to vote, or if the lockup would apply if his wife was awarded the shares, etc, etc.....
Feds reveal charges for Belleair businessman who eluded authorities for months
His ex-wife said Stanton had hidden his wealth in a complex web of companies with the help of friends and business associates.
By William R. Levesque, Times Staff Writer
Posted: Sep 10, 2012 02:30 PM
http://www.tampabay.com/news/feds-reveal-charges-for-belleair-businessman-who-eluded-authorities-for-10/1250768
ORLANDO — John D. Stanton III, captured last week after months on the run, has been indicted on eight charges of failing to file individual and corporate tax returns and a charge of obstructing the IRS, according to a federal indictment unsealed Monday.
Stanton, a former construction materials executive from Belleair, was ordered held without bail in Orlando. He eventually will be transferred to federal custody in Tampa.
He faces jail time for failing to pay his former wife $6 million in support. A judge in Hillsborough County had sentenced him to six months in jail in absentia.
Stanton evaded law enforcement officials for 10 months before federal marshals captured him Friday afternoon at a Fairfield Inn in Orlando, one of several of his favored hotels in the area, his ex-wife said.
Stanton, 63, appeared before U.S. District Court Judge Karla Spaulding in Orlando dressed in a blue jail jumpsuit, with his legs shackled. He appeared calm and did not speak during the hearing. Prosecutors asked the judge to withhold bail because they said he was a flight risk.
Prosecutors said Stanton had been staying in the Orlando area since May, receiving help from friends and business associates while on the run.
Prosecutors said that he had been aided by his girlfriend, whom they said had rented a room for him at the Fairfield Inn where he was arrested. A woman, who was present at Stanton's first appearance in court Monday and who talked to his attorney, refused to identify herself when asked by a reporter.
Stanton is the former president of the Seffner building supplies company Cast Crete Inc., which at one point earned $1 million a week. He once claimed a net worth of $269 million but said he was broke during an acrimonious divorce that was finalized in July 2011.
His ex-wife said Stanton had hidden his wealth in a complex web of companies with the help of friends and business associates.
[Last modified: Sep 10, 2012 03:01 PM]
Feds reveal charges for Belleair businessman who eluded authorities for months
His ex-wife said Stanton had hidden his wealth in a complex web of companies with the help of friends and business associates.
By William R. Levesque, Times Staff Writer
Posted: Sep 10, 2012 02:30 PM
http://www.tampabay.com/news/feds-reveal-charges-for-belleair-businessman-who-eluded-authorities-for-10/1250768
ORLANDO — John D. Stanton III, captured last week after months on the run, has been indicted on eight charges of failing to file individual and corporate tax returns and a charge of obstructing the IRS, according to a federal indictment unsealed Monday.
Stanton, a former construction materials executive from Belleair, was ordered held without bail in Orlando. He eventually will be transferred to federal custody in Tampa.
He faces jail time for failing to pay his former wife $6 million in support. A judge in Hillsborough County had sentenced him to six months in jail in absentia.
Stanton evaded law enforcement officials for 10 months before federal marshals captured him Friday afternoon at a Fairfield Inn in Orlando, one of several of his favored hotels in the area, his ex-wife said.
Stanton, 63, appeared before U.S. District Court Judge Karla Spaulding in Orlando dressed in a blue jail jumpsuit, with his legs shackled. He appeared calm and did not speak during the hearing. Prosecutors asked the judge to withhold bail because they said he was a flight risk.
Prosecutors said Stanton had been staying in the Orlando area since May, receiving help from friends and business associates while on the run.
Prosecutors said that he had been aided by his girlfriend, whom they said had rented a room for him at the Fairfield Inn where he was arrested. A woman, who was present at Stanton's first appearance in court Monday and who talked to his attorney, refused to identify herself when asked by a reporter.
Stanton is the former president of the Seffner building supplies company Cast Crete Inc., which at one point earned $1 million a week. He once claimed a net worth of $269 million but said he was broke during an acrimonious divorce that was finalized in July 2011.
His ex-wife said Stanton had hidden his wealth in a complex web of companies with the help of friends and business associates.
[Last modified: Sep 10, 2012 03:01 PM]
Steve Jobs vs Bill Gates. Epic Rap Battles of History
loved the end of this video, where it's implied that Steve Jobs turns into HAL9000, and a Terminator type of singularity!!!!....very clever....
Take a look at your history
Everything you built leads up to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity
I'm coming in and out of your socket, nothing you do can stop it
I'm in your lap and in your pocket
how you going to shoot me down when I guide the rocket?"
dedicated to John Stanton
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79417346
The Beatles - Taxman (remastered)
Belleair businessman arrested in Orlando after months on the lam
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/bn9/2012/9/10/belleair_businessman.html
ORLANDO -- A Belleair businessman was arrested in Orlando last week after months on the run.
John Stanton III had been indicted on eight charges of failing to file individual and corporate tax returns, plus a charge of obstructing the IRS.
Prosecutors said Stanton, 63, was caught Friday in Orlando after evading law enforcement officials for 10 months. He will eventually be extradited back to the Tampa area.
Stanton, a former construction materials executive, faces jail time for failing to pay his former wife $6 million in support. A Hillsborough County judge sentenced him to six months in jail in absentia.
Belleair businessman arrested in Orlando after months on the lam
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/bn9/2012/9/10/belleair_businessman.html
ORLANDO -- A Belleair businessman was arrested in Orlando last week after months on the run.
John Stanton III had been indicted on eight charges of failing to file individual and corporate tax returns, plus a charge of obstructing the IRS.
Prosecutors said Stanton, 63, was caught Friday in Orlando after evading law enforcement officials for 10 months. He will eventually be extradited back to the Tampa area.
Stanton, a former construction materials executive, faces jail time for failing to pay his former wife $6 million in support. A Hillsborough County judge sentenced him to six months in jail in absentia.
actually, there is another detail:
USEI and John Stanton have entered into a COMMON STOCK LOCK-UP
AGREEMENT which includes all shares held by Mr. Stanton (which is the
reason for this filing)… The agreement is entered into on September 7, 2012. All
of the shares he owns shall be prohibited from transfer by the Management of
USEI and restricted from transfer for a period of not less than 3 years or until the
current investigations are resolved to the Company and Regulatory satisfaction.
whatever "resolved" means in that context......
and I assume he can still vote those shares (????)
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=USEI&id=90205
Adding to Stanton’s woes is a criminal investigation by the IRS, which alleges that Cast Crete failed to file returns from 2003 to 2007, a period in which the company earned $127 million in profit.
http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/blog/morning-edition/2012/09/fugitive-tampa-businessman-stanton.html
John Stanton arrest video (with bonus mugshot!!!):
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/news/region_hillsborough/stanton-arrested-after-nine-months-on-the-run
Steve Jobs vs Bill Gates. Epic Rap Battles of History Season 2
now excuse me while I turn heaven a profit
too bad even those who attended can not agree, whatever the price....but I would blame that on natural human recall tenancies, which is why the WRITTEN WORD (5th grade or not) or a VIDEO would have put this to rest:
http://www.waltersforensic.com/articles/human_factors/vol6-no3.htm
"cash plow positive", which seems to be one of the most important open questions:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79381532
Passed on the last one, adding the others:
1. Numerous posters have reported that he said that the company would actually be cash flow positive in the 1st quarter of 2013.
2. "People who are impatient are not going to like him, he basically said by 1st quarter of 2013 you are going to be able to see tangible results that will get us cash flow positive." (posted 7/23)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77789856
3. We will likely see "significant cash flow by the end of q1 2013". (recalled 9/9)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79379669
4. "Significant revenue will not happen until Q1 2013" from Kevin's presentation. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77832519
5. By Q1 2013 will be a blastoff and cash flow positive if not sooner. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77800598
6. CFP in early 2013. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77795641
7. He is focused, passionate and he basically promised the company would be "cashflow positive in Q1 2013". (posted 7/23)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77789000
hard to say for a trader, with that "of record" clause.....BTW, how much money has RKT invested to "get 'er done"????
Its a lot like the lottery, you gotta be in it to win it.
PS: if someone sold their shares AFTER the "record date", they would not technically be a shareholder any longer, correct???....could they still attend????
it may be "legit", but it shows that ALL shareholders were possibly not eligible, despite all the effort in the world!!!!
any additional input besides others' hearsay on "cash flow positive"????....how did your attendance notes mesh with the below????...
TIA....
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79381532
Passed on the last one, adding the others:
1. Numerous posters have reported that he said that the company would actually be cash flow positive in the 1st quarter of 2013.
2. "People who are impatient are not going to like him, he basically said by 1st quarter of 2013 you are going to be able to see tangible results that will get us cash flow positive." (posted 7/23)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77789856
3. We will likely see "significant cash flow by the end of q1 2013". (recalled 9/9)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79379669
4. "Significant revenue will not happen until Q1 2013" from Kevin's presentation. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77832519
5. By Q1 2013 will be a blastoff and cash flow positive if not sooner. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77800598
6. CFP in early 2013. (posted 7/24)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77795641
7. He is focused, passionate and he basically promised the company would be "cashflow positive in Q1 2013". (posted 7/23)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77789000
The only few I see complaining about the AGM are those who didnt make the effort to attend again this year
that's a crock, the 1st AGM videos were splattered all over.....then the 2nd was claimed to have videos coming, but never did (????).....
the 3rd did not exactly have a lot of lead time for any interested shareholder to make plans....also, not everyone lives in NF, and it might be kind of expensive to take the time and expense to go on a Monday (take off work, flights, hotel, rental car, meals, etc, etc, etc)......so there was bit more than the burden of EFFORT involved for many, I'm sure....
also, shareholder's who bought after June 15 could not go, and it was announced on the 19th, I believe....kind of like a Catch-22
...so it's even possible some shareholders were not eligible, sans EFFORT or not!!!!! WTF????
To attend the JBI, Inc. AGM, participants must have been a shareholder of record as of Friday, June 15, 2012 and must present the following to the registration desk between 1:30 and 3:00 pm EST, on Monday, July 23, 2012:
Ontario, Canada
June 19, 2012
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=8680981-132830-136552&SessionID=Q5TcF6uHp07ZVD7
JOHN DARGAN STANTON III, Chapter 7
Debtor.
____/
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE TO: (I) ESTABLISH
BID AND SALE PROCEDURES, UNDER BANKRUPTCY CODE §§ 105(A)
363(B), (F) AND (M), AND FEDERAL RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE
NO. 2002 AND 6004, INCLUDING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE
PURCHASER, FOR THE SALE FREE AND CLEAR OF LIENS, CLAIMS,
ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PREFERRED SHARES
OWNED BY THE DEBTOR; (II) SCHEDULING A HEARING ON THE
APPROVAL OF THE SALE ON REDUCED NOTICE; AND
(III) APPROVING THE FORM AND MANNER OF NOTICE OF THE SALE
THIS CAUSE came on for a hearing on May 31, 2012, on the Motion of Chapter
7 Trustee to Establish Bid and Sale Procedures dated May 21, 2012 (the “Motion”)1
1 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Motion.
http://www.justice.gov/tax/readingroom/foia/orders/June-8-2012-oRDERS.PDF
Defendant
BT ACQUISITIONS COMPANY LLC
FJ
ERIC PELLENBARG, Esquire
Retained
813-472-7550(W)
Defendant
STANTON, JOHN DARGAN
ROBERT A CARR, Esquire
Retained
813-374-2285(W)
Plaintiff
MAGIC FUNDING GROUP INC
JACKSON O BROWNLEE, Esquire
Retained
407-926-7700(W)
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2001232
significant.....hmmm, reminds me of "serious".....also, YOU'RE looking at, as compared to WE'RE, maybe????...lol, nice word play, IMO...
JB: We’re filling tankers at the site now
Host: What about serious cash flow?
JB: Serious cash flow – you’re looking at a quarter out, really. So you’re looking at Q2.
Today's BNN "The Pitch" TV show with JB
27-Apr-11 04:36 pm http://watch.bnn.ca/#clip457091
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=78531278
The people who didnt attend are left to rely on hearsay.
and there is the problem, in a nutshell....hearsay has been notoriously inaccurate with this Co, IMO.....
John Stanton was responsible for the preparation of the unaudited financial statements through June 30, 2012. The qualifications of Mr. Stanton are outlined in his biographical information set forth in the Information.
Anybody know who Mathew Zuckerman is
Other Persons With Knowledge
Through testimoney in both federal and state courts - the following subjects may have direct knowledge of the whereabouts of fugitive John Stanton. They are directly related to him in business or personal relationship. They are :
Dr. Mathew Zuckerman
http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Known_Associates.html
also, he was once associated with fraudster John Rivera, briefly becoming CEO of one of Rivera's Cos, and has been connected with various other Stanton stocks:
Second, the Company announced plans to merge its biodiesel operations, SolarDiesel, into Nano Chemical Systems Holdings (OTCBB:NCSH). The transaction has a value in excess of $100,000,000. CEO John Stanton announced the rationale for this move. “Our Investment Banking advice was to find a high-tech company with synergistic products and conduct biodiesel operations through a single, focused entity. We have already sold more that 1 million gallons of palm biodiesel. The Company’s business plan has been well received by the investment banking community.” Dr. Matthew Zuckerman, CEO and President of NCSH, commented: “This is a green letter day for NCSH shareholders. SolarDiesel has a unique biodiesel manufacturing capability and NCSH has the nano-technology to improve all biodiesel products usability and shelf-life. With an uninterrupted supply and control from feedstock to final product, NCSH can now accomplish its mission of fully advancing nano-technology into the mainstream production and expansive distribution of bio-friendly diesel fuel, oils and lubricants.”
http://finance.boston.com/boston/news/read?GUID=1411959
http://statecasefiles.justia.com/documents/new-york/other-courts/2012-ny-slip-op-32128-u.pdf?ts=1345130494
(OCR extract, may have some typos)
Defciidants assert numerous defenses which the court finds to be without merit. First, the
court rejects defendants’ apparent contention that Park Avenue Bank improperly rejected a
payment by Bulova of arrears due under the note, based on its allegedly improper objections to a
resolution (Ex. K to Opp. j of Bulova’s Board of Directors authorizing Bulova to make the
payment. Defendants have failed to meet their burden on this defense, as they have alleged in
wholly conclusory fashion that the resolution was adequate and have not addressed any of its
asserted deficiencies including, for example, failure to apportion the payment between the subject
loan and a different loan (the USSEC loan) to Bulova or a related entity.
do some DD, please: BLVT, along with RNDR, USEI, ECSL, PGCXD and NNBP, has been given Caveat Emptor status at OTCMarkets.
This action was taken solely due to their association with John Stanton.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79329523
The IRS had opened a criminal investigation of Stanton over Cast Crete's failure to file returns from 2003 to 2007, a period when the company earned $127 million in profit. The IRS said Stanton siphoned off millions for himself.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/fugitive-businessman-john-stanton-captured-in-orlando/1250325
Peter M Barbee:
http://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Clearwater/peter-m-barbee-P4728323.aspx
http://fugitivejohnstanton.com/Known_Associates.html
Mr. Peter Barbee
Peter Barbee is a known associate of fugitive Stanton. He has admitted that he has active commuication with the fugitive through both phone and possibly in person. He is known to have vast financial knowledge to Stanton's money through stock trading and penny stocks.
Barbee is also considered a personal friend of Stanton and is known to have social ties. Barbee lives in Hernanod Beach Florida. He lives on Spanish Bayonet Drive and neighbors have been warned to be on the lookout for Stanton in the neighborhood.
GOODMAN BALL, INC.,Plaintiff,v.MACH II AVIATION, INC., ESCAPEVELOCITY OF TAMPA BAY, INC., JOHN STANTON, WALTER HOLMICH, PETERARGER, and DOES 1–10, inclusive
No. C 10-01249 WHA
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44335198/Ball-v-Mach-II-Aviation-Patent-MTD
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&rlz=1C2GGGE_enUS386US456&q=C+10-01249+WHA&oq=C+10-01249+WHA&gs_l=hp.3...1545.1545.0.2092.1.1.0.0.0.0.81.
how was it possible to start trading at all????
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79372049
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-64169.pdf
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 64169 / April 4, 2011
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-14315
In the Matter of
Centrack International, Inc.,
Alternafuels, Inc.,
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.,
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE OF HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(j) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Respondents Centrack International, Inc., Alternafuels, Inc., Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
II.
After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:
A. RESPONDENTS
1. Centrack International, Inc. (“CENK”) 1 (CIK No. 1094220) is a forfeited Delaware corporation located in Boca Raton, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). CENK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2002, which reported a net loss of $659,959 for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of CENK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
1The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2.
Alternafuels, Inc. (“ALTFD”) (CIK No. 826743) is a Florida corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). ALTFD is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of ALTFD was quoted on OTC Link (formerly "Pink Sheets") operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. ("OTC Link"), had seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
3.
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc. (“IMIIQ”) (CIK No. 930090) is a void Delaware corporation located in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). IMIIQ is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, which reported a net loss of $10,783,580 for the prior nine months. On November 29, 1999, IMIQ filed a Chapter 11 petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which was terminated on August 18, 2005. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of IMIIQ was quoted on OTC Link, had two market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
4.
Optimark Data Systems, Inc. (“OPMK”) (CIK No. 941904) is a British Columbia corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). OPMK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 1999, which reported a net loss of $121,815 Canadian for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of OPMK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
B. DELINQUENT PERIODIC FILINGS
5.
As discussed in more detail above, all of the Respondents are delinquent in their periodic filings with the Commission, have repeatedly failed to meet their obligations to file timely periodic reports, and failed to heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such letters.
6.
Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13 requires issuers to file quarterly reports.
7.
As a result of the foregoing, Respondents failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.
2
III.
In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be instituted to determine:
A. Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such allegations; and,
B. Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents.
IV.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, and before an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].
If Respondents fail to file the directed Answers, or fail to appear at a hearing after being duly notified, the Respondents, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents, may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 201.221(f), and 201.310].
This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondents personally or by certified, registered, or Express Mail, or by other means permitted by the Commission Rules of Practice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from the date of service of this Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)].
3
In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, except as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not “rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final Commission action.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary
4
Service List
Rule 141 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice provides that the Secretary, or another duly authorized officer of the Commission, shall serve a copy of the Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings and Notice of Hearing Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Order”), on the Respondents and their legal agents.
The attached Order has been sent to the following parties and other persons entitled to notice: The Honorable Brenda P. Murray Chief Administrative Law Judge Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549-2557
David S. Frye, Esq.
Neil J. Welch, Jr., Esq.
Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-6010
By Express Mail:
Centrack International, Inc.
1900 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 305W
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Centrack International, Inc.
c/o Mr. George E. Weast, Jr.
Registered Agent
6299 Pine Drive
Lantana, FL 33462
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
5
3960 RCA Boulevard, Suite 6001
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
c/o Corporation Service Co.
Registered Agent
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19808
By Express Mail:
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
6800 N. Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33614
[The Division of Enforcement will also have a process server attempt personal service on all
respondents.]
6
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-64169.pdf
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 64169 / April 4, 2011
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-14315
In the Matter of
Centrack International, Inc.,
Alternafuels, Inc.,
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.,
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE OF HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(j) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Respondents Centrack International, Inc., Alternafuels, Inc., Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
II.
After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:
A. RESPONDENTS
1. Centrack International, Inc. (“CENK”) 1 (CIK No. 1094220) is a forfeited Delaware corporation located in Boca Raton, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). CENK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2002, which reported a net loss of $659,959 for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of CENK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
1The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2.
Alternafuels, Inc. (“ALTFD”) (CIK No. 826743) is a Florida corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). ALTFD is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of ALTFD was quoted on OTC Link (formerly "Pink Sheets") operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. ("OTC Link"), had seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
3.
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc. (“IMIIQ”) (CIK No. 930090) is a void Delaware corporation located in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). IMIIQ is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, which reported a net loss of $10,783,580 for the prior nine months. On November 29, 1999, IMIQ filed a Chapter 11 petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which was terminated on August 18, 2005. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of IMIIQ was quoted on OTC Link, had two market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
4.
Optimark Data Systems, Inc. (“OPMK”) (CIK No. 941904) is a British Columbia corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). OPMK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 1999, which reported a net loss of $121,815 Canadian for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of OPMK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
B. DELINQUENT PERIODIC FILINGS
5.
As discussed in more detail above, all of the Respondents are delinquent in their periodic filings with the Commission, have repeatedly failed to meet their obligations to file timely periodic reports, and failed to heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such letters.
6.
Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13 requires issuers to file quarterly reports.
7.
As a result of the foregoing, Respondents failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.
2
III.
In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be instituted to determine:
A. Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such allegations; and,
B. Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents.
IV.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, and before an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].
If Respondents fail to file the directed Answers, or fail to appear at a hearing after being duly notified, the Respondents, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents, may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 201.221(f), and 201.310].
This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondents personally or by certified, registered, or Express Mail, or by other means permitted by the Commission Rules of Practice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from the date of service of this Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)].
3
In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, except as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not “rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final Commission action.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary
4
Service List
Rule 141 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice provides that the Secretary, or another duly authorized officer of the Commission, shall serve a copy of the Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings and Notice of Hearing Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Order”), on the Respondents and their legal agents.
The attached Order has been sent to the following parties and other persons entitled to notice: The Honorable Brenda P. Murray Chief Administrative Law Judge Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549-2557
David S. Frye, Esq.
Neil J. Welch, Jr., Esq.
Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-6010
By Express Mail:
Centrack International, Inc.
1900 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 305W
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Centrack International, Inc.
c/o Mr. George E. Weast, Jr.
Registered Agent
6299 Pine Drive
Lantana, FL 33462
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
5
3960 RCA Boulevard, Suite 6001
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
c/o Corporation Service Co.
Registered Agent
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19808
By Express Mail:
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
6800 N. Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33614
[The Division of Enforcement will also have a process server attempt personal service on all
respondents.]
6
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-64169.pdf
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 64169 / April 4, 2011
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-14315
In the Matter of
Centrack International, Inc.,
Alternafuels, Inc.,
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.,
Respondents.
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE OF HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(j) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Respondents Centrack International, Inc., Alternafuels, Inc., Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc., and Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
II.
After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:
A. RESPONDENTS
1. Centrack International, Inc. (“CENK”) 1 (CIK No. 1094220) is a forfeited Delaware corporation located in Boca Raton, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). CENK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2002, which reported a net loss of $659,959 for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of CENK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
1The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2.
Alternafuels, Inc. (“ALTFD”) (CIK No. 826743) is a Florida corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). ALTFD is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of ALTFD was quoted on OTC Link (formerly "Pink Sheets") operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. ("OTC Link"), had seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
3.
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc. (“IMIIQ”) (CIK No. 930090) is a void Delaware corporation located in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). IMIIQ is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999, which reported a net loss of $10,783,580 for the prior nine months. On November 29, 1999, IMIQ filed a Chapter 11 petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, which was terminated on August 18, 2005. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of IMIIQ was quoted on OTC Link, had two market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).
4.
Optimark Data Systems, Inc. (“OPMK”) (CIK No. 941904) is a British Columbia corporation located in Tampa, Florida with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). OPMK is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 1999, which reported a net loss of $121,815 Canadian for the prior nine months. As of March 30, 2011, the common stock of OPMK was quoted on OTC Link, had five market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c211(f)(3).
B. DELINQUENT PERIODIC FILINGS
5.
As discussed in more detail above, all of the Respondents are delinquent in their periodic filings with the Commission, have repeatedly failed to meet their obligations to file timely periodic reports, and failed to heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such letters.
6.
Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers of securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13 requires issuers to file quarterly reports.
7.
As a result of the foregoing, Respondents failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.
2
III.
In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors that public administrative proceedings be instituted to determine:
A. Whether the allegations contained in Section II hereof are true and, in connection therewith, to afford the Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such allegations; and,
B. Whether it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to suspend for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoke the registration of each class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of the Respondents identified in Section II hereof, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents.
IV.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on the questions set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened at a time and place to be fixed, and before an Administrative Law Judge to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 110 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.110].
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b)].
If Respondents fail to file the directed Answers, or fail to appear at a hearing after being duly notified, the Respondents, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents, may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against it upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 201.221(f), and 201.310].
This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondents personally or by certified, registered, or Express Mail, or by other means permitted by the Commission Rules of Practice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from the date of service of this Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice [17 C.F.R. § 201.360(a)(2)].
3
In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually related proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, except as witness or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not “rule making” within the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not deemed subject to the provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final Commission action.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary
4
Service List
Rule 141 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice provides that the Secretary, or another duly authorized officer of the Commission, shall serve a copy of the Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings and Notice of Hearing Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Order”), on the Respondents and their legal agents.
The attached Order has been sent to the following parties and other persons entitled to notice: The Honorable Brenda P. Murray Chief Administrative Law Judge Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549-2557
David S. Frye, Esq.
Neil J. Welch, Jr., Esq.
Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-6010
By Express Mail:
Centrack International, Inc.
1900 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 305W
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Centrack International, Inc.
c/o Mr. George E. Weast, Jr.
Registered Agent
6299 Pine Drive
Lantana, FL 33462
By Express Mail:
Alternafuels, Inc.
2409 N. Falkenburg Road
Tampa, FL 33619
Alternafuels, Inc.
c/o Mr. John Stanton
President and Registered Agent
19337 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
By Express Mail:
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
5
3960 RCA Boulevard, Suite 6001
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Intelligent Medical Imaging, Inc.
c/o Corporation Service Co.
Registered Agent
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19808
By Express Mail:
Optimark Data Systems, Inc.
6800 N. Dale Mabry Highway, Suite 100
Tampa, FL 33614
[The Division of Enforcement will also have a process server attempt personal service on all
respondents.]
6
2409 N FALKENBURG RD
TAMPA FL 33619
Occupancy:
Vacant
http://www.showcase.com/property/2409-N-Falkenburg-Road/Tampa/Florida/617937
(a complex web, indeed!!!)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/Alkane-Inc-ALKN-1857/
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=74955007
Very interesting...READ THIS!!
John Stanton is the new registered agent as of yesterday and also a new direction:
Principal Address
2409 N FALKENBURG RD
TAMPA FL 33619 UN
Changed 04/30/2012
Mailing Address
2409 N FALKENBURG RD
TAMPA FL 33619 UN
Changed 04/30/2012
Registered Agent Name & Address
STANTON, JOHN
2409 N FALKENBURG RD
TAMPA FL 33619 US
Name Changed: 04/30/2012
Besides, it seems they just filled the annual report:
Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date
2010 10/14/2010
2011 04/29/2011
2012 04/30/2012
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=K13481&inq_came_from=NAMFWD&cor_web_names_seq_number=0004&names_name_ind=&names_cor_number=&names_name_seq=&names_name_ind=&names_comp_name=ALKANE&names_filing_type=
lots of SEC uploads and correspondences, what's that all about???
PS: and yet another address for the SEC letter???
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000317889&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/317889/000000000012007030/filename1.pdf
February 8, 2012
Via E-mail
Stephen L. Gurba
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Bulova Technologies Group, Inc.
19337 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
Re: Bulova Technologies Group, Inc.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011
Filed January 13, 2012
File No. 000-09358
Dear Mr. Gurba:
We have completed our review of your filing. We remind you that our comments or changes to disclosure in response to our comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the company or the filing and the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable rules require.
Sincerely,
/s/ Stephen Krikorian
Stephen Krikorian
lots of SEC uploads and correspondences, what's that all about???
PS: and yet another address for the SEC letter???
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000317889&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/317889/000000000012007030/filename1.pdf
February 8, 2012
Via E-mail
Stephen L. Gurba
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Bulova Technologies Group, Inc.
19337 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 525
Clearwater, FL 33764
Re: Bulova Technologies Group, Inc.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011
Filed January 13, 2012
File No. 000-09358
Dear Mr. Gurba:
We have completed our review of your filing. We remind you that our comments or changes to disclosure in response to our comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the company or the filing and the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable rules require.
Sincerely,
/s/ Stephen Krikorian
Stephen Krikorian