Wow, someone else with a clue made a post.

I was thinking the same thing. Who cares about college when you are rich... But then I thought again and decided that there would be nothing better than a stress free education. Knowing that you would be smart and enjoy a deeper understanding of the world around you is priceless.

Well, it seems to make sense that the audit be current through the fiscal year. It's very possible to see some things from August/Sept that we havn't seen numbers for yet.

Could see a knee jerk next week... (OMG where did those extra $M's come from!!!) LOL

JMO

It was posted maybe 300 or 400 posts ago... maybe a thousand posts ago... who knows lol.

Actually, there was a lot of discussion about that website and how they need to start doing the updates "after" some editting is done.

I reserve the right to use the entire 15 minutes of my edit time until this stock goes to atleast $4 per share and I can consider my self wealthy enough to purchas a subscription! hahaha

Well, it's pretty obvious that the first half of the week (early part of the week) is 18-20 September. LMAO

Wow, look at us splitting hairs at 3:30 AM EST hahaha

Are you kidding? Go read Petar V's statement on the sulja website... he says early this week. 18-20 Sept is early this week.

All we can do is wait for this week to transpire and then we'll have real news. All of what is on MAM at the moment is just rehashing and reposting of what we all already know.

Again, really disappointed at the quality of info being broadcasted by some folks involved in this.

I mean, this is sort of misleading because it can be interpreted that one of three companies has indicated something when we all know that only one company has any business making any indications. That company is SLJB, of course:

SULJA BROS. HIGHLIGHTS AUDITED FINANCIALS (KPMG/PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS) <!--[if !supportLists]-->Company has indicated between September 18th to September 20th for Release.

SULJA BROS. HIGHLIGHTS AUDITED FINANCIALS (KPMG/PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS) <!--[if !supportLists]-->Company has indicated between September 18th to September 20th for Release.

Which company has indicated this? SLJB, PWC or KPMG???

From reading comprehension I take Sulja Brothers to be the "company" that is "highlighting" auditing financials. Sulja Bros have been identifying AF between 18-20 September for some time now. Nothing new here, really.

LOL

Cheers, mate :)

I must be following the path less travelled. The path somewhere between the non-stop pumping/cheerleading path and the FUD/MB idiotic bashing path. I see black, white, shades of gray and the full spectrum of visible light.

I'm not going to sell for at least a year even if the profits just boggle my mind. I have to weigh in tax considerations among other things.

If you knew anything about this company you would buy and not sell. I'm not going to sell because of my doubts about this new IR firm but I have every right to demand better.

Anyone that ignores hazards will die to those hazards in one way or another. Nature dictates caution; Survival of the fittest.

If Marquee folks and SLJB folks really do pay any attention to these boards then maybe they will listen, learn, and improve.

GLTA

Go SlJB!

Okay, I really am beating a dead horse and if I'm still in this past next week I'll send more e-mails to MAM. I've sent one already about a week ago. This is the last I'll comment about how unhappy I am about MAM's website...

What is with all they wierd html protocol code littering the home page? And then some crazy bold printed obscure font that just gives me a head ache to look at. Nice numbers but I wish it didn't look so ugly.

Wierd html stuff:

<!--[if !supportLists]-->

<!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]--><!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]-->

From the MAM website:

SULJA BROS. HIGHLIGHTS AUDITED FINANCIALS (KPMG/PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS) <!--[if !supportLists]-->Company has indicated between September 18th to September 20th for Release.

<!--[endif]-->During the 12 months from June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006, Sulja Brothers Building Supplies earned $63,047,611.00. The company made $28,371,424.95 grossprofit with a $26,023,991.63 in pre-tax profits. Net profits were $15,879,839.69 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The 2007 pro forma estimated revenue is $307,007,451.50
"Plus 350,000,000.00".............Equals $657,007,451.50"
Estimated net profits for 2007 are $93,951,965.18....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]--><!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]-->

I never "bashed" MAM. I pointed out deficiencies that I would like to see corrected because I'm a concerned long share holder.

Will the MAM concerns mattr when this stock goes OTC BB or when it goes to NASDAQ or when it goes past $10 per share? Yes, it will still matter.

I'm sure the folks at MAM have the best intentions and are diligent hard working folks. I respect their efforts but they have a lot of room for improvement and need to hire some editors.

I just got off the phone with Santa Claus! He said he's making a list and checking it twice! The list will be verified by at least two major auditting firms and we can expect to see the results of said list sometime in mid/late December!

Fasten your seat belts folks! Santa is gonna rocket ship us to the moon!

I know that and you know that but SLJB stated in a PR that they hired MAM. I'm just expressing my discontent with MAM's website. SLJB's numbers are soon to be verified and we will all be happy about the numbers. That doesn't change the fact that MAM's website continues to be less than top-notch. The website was looking really good for a while. Now, they made some updates that make us look like we are building the plane as we fly it. Update in the background and then display an edited finished product for interested potential investors.

But please... EDIT! Hire an editor! Hell, hire a team of editors. I'll volunteer; I wrote for my high school newspaper and had college level English composition one and two.


"MAM isn't running the company. They just need to keep posting the numbers as they increase, and increase, and increase....the numbers will take care of the PPS, not MAM.

JJ"

Brent from what I have seen is NOT a basher. I don't know much about Angela.

I agree with Brent about the MAM website. If you are a concerned investor in this company I would recommend you voice some concerns as well. There is some damage repair to be done because of the MAM website IMO.

I'm sorry, but MAM needs to update in the background and take an hour or so in the wee hours of the day to update the foreground. Oh, and before they pat themselves on the back and throw the update out for all to see it is a good idea to have some friends EDIT.

I'm a shareholder and I prefer a higher degree of professionalism from MAM than continually having poor language use and a website that looks like a littered sandbox.

In a word, juvenile. It can be MUCH better.

I don't know how many investors have been turned off because of MAM. I know MAM is looking more and more like a warning signal then a halcyon good will harbinger...

sheesh man, your post is so two weeks ago! LMAO

This won't drop that low for quite awhile IMO.

Thanks Gwikley. Added it to my favorites.

Oh, and it must be a good sign when folks are concerned about what taxes they'll have to pay, right? lol

www.traderstatus.com

Is there a link to an actual survey message board that shows the bar chart or is this something being calculted in someones bedroom somewhere? lol

Thanks TFN. I did some clicks on e-trade and that's where I got the hold for a year for reduced tax numbers. But it still seemed a little vague. I'm not too worried about it for now.

Just happy to see green EOD's for SLJB :)

Holding long for tax breaks and more good news for SLJB.

LMAO, and I agree.

The biggest thing I'm nervous about is where I should exit. I have no problem staying long and I wouldn't be surprised to see this in double digit dollar range, some day.

I think it just depends on my situation in a few months and in a few years from now. I can retire from my current job in about six years or I could leave in a year if my financial situation were good enough.

I'm new to this and I don't even understand the tax situation. I hope I don't have to pay taxes on gains that I haven't sold yet, lol. It seems like I saw somewhere you have to pay 10% even on gains that you haven't sold but it's like 25% if you actually sell them before holding for a year?? Ugh.

Hopefully, it works where I don't pay taxes for until I actually sell and then it's only 10 or 15% for selling after holding for a year. I could do that, no problem.

Oh, and what if I felt confident enough to flip this at some point? If I sell for a profit but immediately reinvest at a lower price and am lucky enough for it to rise again... Do I get taxed while i'm still investing gains? I don't think I should be but hey, life ain't fair.

Lots to think about for everyone involved in this.

Right, I see your point... I'm new and make incorrect assumptions. Shorters borrow money on anticipation that a stock will decrease in value so any increase would be bad. For example, if a shorter "buys" a short position of 100 shares at $10 per shares and is lucky enough to sell the shorted stock at $8 per share then he just made $200.

However, the scary thing for a shorter is if the stock sky rockets to $100 per share then he has to come up with $10,000???

What happens when they all just run out of money and declare bankruptcy? Do we still get our money!?!?

If partysasquatch says .50 or he'll eat his hat... I want pictures if he has to eat his hat LOL... Good lord, have you seen his hat!?!?! hahaha

While I was reading your post I was thinking about what Wessal's 25% buy means. I'm sure someone has said it before but... It's basically a get out of jail free card for shorters, right? Or, another tool outside of things like share count identification or issuing a dividend to force a short position cover, right?

I'm not saying this was some plan or scheme but it is certainly fortunate for all involved; longs, flippers, shorters, and insiders. It's win-win-win-win... LOL.

Sorry to hear that Mr. Bishop. All my best wishes for recovery are yours and your wife's.

Yeah, i see .083 on e-trade. was the same when i checked ameritrade on my cellphone.

Good night all.

Hope you all can sleep... big days ahead!

For that matter, if the AF are released on Monday or Tuesday and still posted to the SLJB website then the PR is still accurate :)

woops i posted this in the wrong reply thing :P

Yeah but! Yeah but!! LOL...

He said, "Early next week the completed audit will be available for shareholders to view at www.suljabros.com."

Early in the week equates to Monday or Tuesday. He used the word "will". He did not use words like "should", "could" or "may be"...

hehehheehehe

Wow! Sounds pretty cut and dry to me. CEO confirms audit will be complete and the stamped copy is to be posted early next week... leaving a whole two days for some bargain purchases.

Should see a lot of buys very soon IMO.

FrankieJ posted:

"The company financial audit is nearing completion. We anticipate having the audit stamped this week. Early next week the completed audit will be available for shareholders to view at www.suljabros.com. I will also issue a new statement made available at the same website on Monday morning."

Knowns: CEO statement out Monday morning.

Thanks :)

Did someone say there was a PR today? I didn't see it... anyone have a link or cut/paste? TIA

So investors are causing direct damage to the SLJB reputation, according to the new CEO. That is just terrible. What is the root cause? Is it these boards? Is it the internet and broader access to news PR's in general?

There are important questions to be asked. How have other businesses dealt with such things? Certainly, SLJB is not the only company to have been swamped by phonecalls from eager investors.

SLJB needs to look at how other successful businesses have dealth with these investors and how other businesses have successfully planned with their constituents regarding investor relations.

I'm disappointed by the fact that SLJB has had to respond to something like this instead of having been prepared. When you make such claims that your business will provide some of the biggest returns in the market then you should be prepared for the millions of investors that will inquire as to how your business plans to make that possible.

In supervision you don't take your subordinates word for everything. Of course, there must be a degree of trust. However, when you want to see how your subordinate is performing it is imperative that you seek the input from those working with your subordinate as well as any customers your subordinate may have serviced.

It's common sense.

Eagerly anticipating audited fins so that everyone will just ess tee eff yeww for a while...

I wouldn't say, "useless drivel". It serves a purpose. Everyone deserves to look at love from both sides. However, there is far more "concrete" DD for the positive then there is for the negative... In fact I have yet to see one piece of DD that would turn me off from being long in this stock.


Time to sit back, relax and watch this baby unfold.

I never used the word "meaningless". So, no.

It was up 20% on news of a $350M contract. Then it was down smaller percentages in following days (something like 7%, 5%, and 3%... if memory serves).

IMO, it's like investors are optimistic and cautious at the same time. They see $350M and pounce and then they go back and weigh the other variables: no filings, no audited fins, CEO changes, big league auditors being named, big money coming in from other big businesses, etc etc etc).

Some of the variables are positive, some negative and some are either/or; subject to debate.

All any of us can really do is make our best guesses and hope for the audited fins, future SEC filings and continued business success. So, pumping negative vibes that are only a matter of conjecture is foolsplay by anyone's common sense.

I hope the SLJB legal deptartment is able to bring some justice against folks intentionally undermining business operations.

Agreed. Audited financials should be simple validation of SLJB's Pr'd business transactions.

Thank you, that made me laugh a little.

All I know is that I saw a lot of deleted posts today. SPIN finally got banned. Thank goodness (I think).

Okay, here's the SLJB part: several 3rd party references seem to validate this company as not being fraudulent. This company is making PROFITS. Construction in the middle east is a booming industry for one reason or another (oil rich Arabs and war torn communities).

Thanks,

Iz

I live in Alaska BTW... it's not that late here :)