So investors are causing direct damage to the SLJB reputation, according to the new CEO. That is just terrible. What is the root cause? Is it these boards? Is it the internet and broader access to news PR's in general?
There are important questions to be asked. How have other businesses dealt with such things? Certainly, SLJB is not the only company to have been swamped by phonecalls from eager investors.
SLJB needs to look at how other successful businesses have dealth with these investors and how other businesses have successfully planned with their constituents regarding investor relations.
I'm disappointed by the fact that SLJB has had to respond to something like this instead of having been prepared. When you make such claims that your business will provide some of the biggest returns in the market then you should be prepared for the millions of investors that will inquire as to how your business plans to make that possible.
In supervision you don't take your subordinates word for everything. Of course, there must be a degree of trust. However, when you want to see how your subordinate is performing it is imperative that you seek the input from those working with your subordinate as well as any customers your subordinate may have serviced.
It's common sense.
Eagerly anticipating audited fins so that everyone will just ess tee eff yeww for a while...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
