Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
Hello All:
While doing my DD this what I found.
The Chinese are definitely involving with SVMI. I can't read Chinese but this is a site where the Chinese are talking about Savi Media's Dynovalves
http://ati.nstl.gov.cn/car/research/hydt/fzqj/32629.asp
This is a 100% legit folks.
SVMI Long and Strong.
lawsson
we may be heading $100 a barrel!!!!=(
lawsson
hi:
new to board....interested in silver plays...
hello all;
what is the o/s and Floating for this one?
lawsson
Mick and Trader:
I've been on the Ihub sometime now, I sure this is another great board like the other ones you guys have. Thanks for all your help.
lawsson
Mick and Trader:
I've been on the Ihub sometime now, I sure this is another great board. Thanks for all your help.
lawsson
fyi great news
11:26 am, 04/03/2006
Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's top environmental advisors, in a report on how to combat global warming, are recommending that the state require power plant operators and other heavy industries to report the amount of greenhouse gas they emit.
The report, which is expected to be released by the Schwarzenegger administration today, is the first step in fulfilling the governor's pledge last year to enact firm targets for reducing carbon dioxide pollution beginning as early as 2010.
"Mandatory reporting is something we need to get started on as soon as possible," said Terry Tamminen, the governor's advisor on energy and the environment. "You can't make targets if you don't have anything to measure."
Schwarzenegger, who is free to embrace or reject all or part of the recommendations from his Climate Action Team, is expected to signal the direction he wants to take at a global warming summit he's called for April 11 in San Francisco.
Environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers said they were heartened by the report. Business groups, however, said they were concerned that mandatory reporting of carbon dioxide pollution could lead to limits on greenhouse gas emissions that could destroy jobs in California by driving manufacturers to other states and countries.
"This is not about reporting. It's about caps," said Allan Zaremberg, president of the California Chamber of Commerce. Global warming is not a local problem and greenhouse gas emissions shouldn't be regulated by the state, he said.
The chamber and allied groups, including the California Farm Bureau, the Western States Petroleum Assn. and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, have asked the state to study how the governor's greenhouse gas initiative might affect jobs.
The release of the administration report is designed to coincide with the planned unveiling today of a bill by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblywoman Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills). The bill would direct the California Air Resources Board to set mandatory caps on industry that would meet the governor's target of lowering greenhouse gas emissions by 25% over forecasted levels by 2020.
The governor is committed to working with the Legislature to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets he set in a June 2005 executive order, Tamminen said.
"By setting binding limits, the bill will make the governor's targets real," said Devra Wang, an energy expert with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The climate team's recommendations, signaled in a draft report released in December, include a proposal to levy a small tax on gasoline sales to finance research in alternatives to fossil fuels, but Schwarzenegger has said he won't pursue that option.
Most scientists believe that global warming is caused in part by pollution from burning coal and other fossil fuels. According to the administration report, the rapid buildup of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is raising temperatures around the globe, causing the polar icecaps to shrink and raising ocean levels.
Backers of both the bill and the climate team recommendations agree that California needs a market-based solution for fighting greenhouse gas pollution. They contend that reporting emissions and allowing trading of rights to emit carbon dioxide in limited amounts would create incentives for California scientists and companies to develop new technologies to counter global warming.
They cite a UC Berkeley study released in January predicting that the governor's greenhouse gas reduction target could create over 20,000 new jobs and add $60 billion to California's gross state product by 2020.
Though mainline business groups question the upbeat economic analysis, a number of other business groups, particularly venture capitalists and high-tech entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, are enthusiastic about the proposed campaign to combat greenhouse gas.
"We don't want to be dismissive of potential negative impacts to certain sectors of the economy, but at the same time, we recognize that there are potential opportunities as well," said Margaret Bruce, environmental program director for the Silicon Valley Leadership group.
or a 1000 bagger.
one dollar or MORE.!!!!
you know something we don't know? haha =)
the potential of this technology is unlimited. Imagine every single machinery that runs on diesel or gasoline would need this technology to reduce emission output.
We live in an INFORMATION AGE but the backbone of all this still relies on good ol fashion INDUSTRIAL AGE techonology (trains, vessels, automobiles, machineries, etc.) to do the job. Therefore, every facets of life would need this patented technology to help meet the increasingly required regulations of reduce emission.
This stock is for Longs, not shorttimers. Daytraders will eventually get burn.
lawsson
it's a matter of weeks before they launch it. As in the previous PR, SVMI are going through changes which only to enhance the product...basically to make it more practical.
Don't be surprise folks if this one hit $1.00. =)
Great News for SVMI!
11:26 am, 04/03/2006
Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's top environmental advisors, in a report on how to combat global warming, are recommending that the state require power plant operators and other heavy industries to report the amount of greenhouse gas they emit.
The report, which is expected to be released by the Schwarzenegger administration today, is the first step in fulfilling the governor's pledge last year to enact firm targets for reducing carbon dioxide pollution beginning as early as 2010.
"Mandatory reporting is something we need to get started on as soon as possible," said Terry Tamminen, the governor's advisor on energy and the environment. "You can't make targets if you don't have anything to measure."
Schwarzenegger, who is free to embrace or reject all or part of the recommendations from his Climate Action Team, is expected to signal the direction he wants to take at a global warming summit he's called for April 11 in San Francisco.
Environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers said they were heartened by the report. Business groups, however, said they were concerned that mandatory reporting of carbon dioxide pollution could lead to limits on greenhouse gas emissions that could destroy jobs in California by driving manufacturers to other states and countries.
"This is not about reporting. It's about caps," said Allan Zaremberg, president of the California Chamber of Commerce. Global warming is not a local problem and greenhouse gas emissions shouldn't be regulated by the state, he said.
The chamber and allied groups, including the California Farm Bureau, the Western States Petroleum Assn. and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, have asked the state to study how the governor's greenhouse gas initiative might affect jobs.
The release of the administration report is designed to coincide with the planned unveiling today of a bill by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblywoman Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills). The bill would direct the California Air Resources Board to set mandatory caps on industry that would meet the governor's target of lowering greenhouse gas emissions by 25% over forecasted levels by 2020.
The governor is committed to working with the Legislature to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets he set in a June 2005 executive order, Tamminen said.
"By setting binding limits, the bill will make the governor's targets real," said Devra Wang, an energy expert with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The climate team's recommendations, signaled in a draft report released in December, include a proposal to levy a small tax on gasoline sales to finance research in alternatives to fossil fuels, but Schwarzenegger has said he won't pursue that option.
Most scientists believe that global warming is caused in part by pollution from burning coal and other fossil fuels. According to the administration report, the rapid buildup of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is raising temperatures around the globe, causing the polar icecaps to shrink and raising ocean levels.
Backers of both the bill and the climate team recommendations agree that California needs a market-based solution for fighting greenhouse gas pollution. They contend that reporting emissions and allowing trading of rights to emit carbon dioxide in limited amounts would create incentives for California scientists and companies to develop new technologies to counter global warming.
They cite a UC Berkeley study released in January predicting that the governor's greenhouse gas reduction target could create over 20,000 new jobs and add $60 billion to California's gross state product by 2020.
Though mainline business groups question the upbeat economic analysis, a number of other business groups, particularly venture capitalists and high-tech entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, are enthusiastic about the proposed campaign to combat greenhouse gas.
"We don't want to be dismissive of potential negative impacts to certain sectors of the economy, but at the same time, we recognize that there are potential opportunities as well," said Margaret Bruce, environmental program director for the Silicon Valley Leadership group.
exactly...I am holding on to my svmi.
the point is well taken.
I concurred what you said. The delay may also due to the fact the company wanted to create a product where it is universal to all automobile as suppose to different model for different model of car.
the chinese are really trying to reduce their emission output and other pollute products and at the same time continue the longest economic growth their country ever had.
I would'e be surpise if there are some deals that may be in the works....but before that I think SVMI will have to get Dynovalve out, market it. I this is all nice and dandy.
what doyou mean go now for Aroon? what range is considered a 'GO'? Thanks.
what do you want to hear from me.... ask away. you can even PM me.....let me know what you know and we go from there. thanks.
SVMI go go go!
I tried calling the CEO the whole day but with no luck.
Eventually, I just got off the phone with one of the executive Steve Sperrazza ( http://www.primezone.com/newsroom/news.html?d=74018 ). He sounds like a honest guy. I spent 15 mins. Talking to him about the product and your marketing strategy. He said the CEO was too busy to get a hold of and I understand that because they are ready to launch there product line in the very near future. I asked for more detail and he said…he would violate a lot of SEC regulations if he do so. He was careful what to say about the future. he was pretty straight forward as in why they delay They want their product to be as close to perfect as possible. He was very welcoming for me to visit his 100,000 sq ft facility. I was too busy during lunch to wing by… I will try it again. But from a search there is a 100,000 sq ft building at that address given.
I am no pumper or dumper as you can see from my history…I can tell you this….they sound like a very legit company.
I am very very excited about this company. Unless I screwed up but they pretty so far convinced me their launch and marketing strategy will shake the industry…not only here in the USA but oversea (hint hint)
lawsson
I am in cali...in LA. planning on heading down there this lunch.
which are you referring to?
T4M:
What is your take on NNSR? Do you think it has bottom? Thanks
anyone knows the floating and o/s for NNSR and why they pulled back so much back Jan.
anyone knows the o/s and floating of this stock?
I guess somebody is bullish...lol
time will tell.
very good news!
your take on svmi? TIA
Are there any other avian flu plays board out there besides this one? TIA
T4M:
I remembered XSNX was one of your call last summer....good one.
Lawsson
thanks for your tips!!!
gotta thanks...does it mean the stock may run up?
Can somebobdy tell me, what does it mean when a stock "double bottom'?
Thank you for your expedious and well inform post. Your post is probably removing the market now....lol