Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A CFO is subject to more culpability than a mere director... Maybe consciously put himself in a more protected position where he's not so deeply involved in the finances but still part of the insiders cabal. And make no mistake, this playing of musical positions has always been part of the master template for this sophisticated personal ATM operation. It's all in the records. All the dots always connect. Those waiting for the proverbial ship to come in shouldn't hold their breath.
You never know but that sounds far more plausible.
I don't know....kinda looks like the pump has begun...
"No news is ALWAYS GOOD NEWS... i mean it just means they are either spending more time negotiating, or possibly negotiating bringing the RBR patent trial into a similar agreement... who knows.."
fast fwd
"I feel like I just got scammed!"
tooooofunnnnny
I predict 6 to 7 in less than 2 wks, but then again......wtfdik?
I tried to repeat that but I gagged
Otay! Where do we start? You take the lead
Oh my, we almost got to touch the ones today... So has the pump begun? It's looking that way.....
Damn.....that's gonna leave a mark
Won't be long b4 the core patents enter their 3rd decade... Getting pretty ripe... They should be almost ready to buy soon. Throw em on the scale weigh em up!
Let's see....the core patents were created when?............... around 2004 you say?............and this is getting close to 2024..........so going on 20 yrs, right? Ok, cool.......so they must be totally compatible and in sync ready to rock in today's modern systems.......oh heck yeah
"in the premises; and having duly rendered its verdict, in favor of the above-named Plaintiff Locksmith Financial Corporation, and against the Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett on the cause of action of breach of fiduciary duty; and having rendered its verdict in favor of above-named Third-Party Counterclaimant TK Investment, Ltd. and against the Defendant VOIP-Pal.com, Inc. on the claim of unjust enrichment; and having awarded Defendants nothing by way of their counterclaims and third-party claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment be entered in favor of
Plaintiff Locksmith ·Financial Corporation and against Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett, on the claim of Breach of Fiduciary
Duty,
"Apple, Verizon and AT&T were regrettably unwilling to engage in discussion of licensing the Company’s intellectual property and technology."
_______________________________________________________
Wait a min...wait a min....hold the friggin phone.........
Will someone please tell me.....
Am I imagining things.......or were we not told.....over and over and over..... right here....drilled into our heads daily.....that these companies were in talks with vplm and myself and 1 or 2 others also said there were no ongoing infringement talks but the insistence was always there everyday that they were in talks and there was also some intimating that the talks were getting real close......
I ASK YOU......DID THAT NOT HAPPEN???
Hahahahahahahaha and they swear up and down that there's never any pump and dump from the company.......... lololololololol..........WHATS THAT, CHOPPED LIVER? boho hehehe
I'll stand by while the inevitable explanation of how this is all good for us by our leader, great savior and dammit, one bombastic UPHOLDER OF All THE BEST FIDUCIARY MANAGEMENT THE GREAT EMU COULD MUSTER. YESIREEBOB...JUST LIKE THE AMAZING 1 -2 PUNCH TAG TEAM OF THE USPTO & PTAB......lolololol.....we bring you the KING & QUEEN of the best and most sophisticated hi tech, leader of the realm of voip, THE VOIP PAL AND PAL-ETTE the GIFT of the MAGI, Emu and Babs! Hip hop hoorah! ...Hip hip hoorah!...hip hop hooray!
Since emu is from Egypt, should we call it a pyramid scheme? Will it break the camel's back? I'm calling my mummy.
By the time I get my 50¢, fifty cents won't be worth a nickel....
What a revolting development this is...
Oh cool.....looks like I'm gonna get to say "touching the 2's again".......haha.....and be told that's not possible..... c'mon let's see that 3.0
Oh yeah, just look at the 1 month chart to see how "it's moving up"......
In could be wrong but I don't think that the cables are made with lead anymore or for a long time. Maybe not since the 50s. That doesn't mean there's no environmental dangers just that it's not used anymore. Especially bad are the many miles of underwater cable. I think this will become a huge story with big possible impact on environment. The question is when did the ma bell companies know it was dangerous to environment? I also read that some pvc also contains lead, cadmium and other toxic chemicals that can leach. The past gives us gifts that keep on giving. No wonder so much cancer in the 20 and 21 centuries
Let there be LIGHTER POCKETS, is more like it...
No worries... See "true longs" for detailed positive explanation. It's all good. "Trust me"...."trust the PROCESS"
process cheese
Half cent, eh? Lolol.....ever heard of "THE GIFT IF THE MAGI"?
whoop, dere it is.....whoop, dere it is
Can't deny the optics.. unless of course you bought one of the special vplm gold plated blinders. I heard there was a big run on them sent from Fla
Yip....positive.....ly...........dreck
Down about 50% in a month. Yay!!
Definitely a harbinger of great things coming
I think it's time for another conference call (infomercial)
Oh, and look....great time to buy
"IF you are investing heavily in penny stocks there is a 99% chance you're down overall anyway, and to tell me how much profit you're going to make in the future makes you look silly."
__________________________________
100%.....except I think the number is closer to 99.9% from my observations
I think the good ol pump will begin this week... Ya never know...well,.actually, you do kinda know with vplm. Very predictable.
ON JUNE 16,2015
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP.ANNOUNCES THAT ON APRIL 30,2015 A COMPLAINT
WAS FILED AGAINST VOIP-PAL.COM.INC., OTC Pink: VPLM
CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT.NO.: I
DISTRICT COURT ,CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP (Plaintiff)
? vs
VOIP-PAL.COM.INC , a Nevada corporation
THOMAS SAWYER, an individual
EMIL MALAK, an individual
EDWIN CANDY, an individual
COLIN TUCKER , an individual
DENNIS CHANG, an individual
DOES I through X, inclusive
and ROE ENTITIES XI through M, inclusive
? Defendants
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP. FILED PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO DISMISS and MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORP. (Debt Capital,Corporate Finance,Private Placement and Debt Financing for Public Companies-)
COMPLAINT FOR:
?1) Breach of Contract
2) Fraud/ Misrepresentation
?3) Securities Fraud
?4) Breach of Fiduciary Duty
5) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and fair Dealing
?6) Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Arbitration Exemption Requested:
Amount in Controversy Exceeds
$50,000.00
?
?2.VOIP-Pal.ComWAS SERVED AT THE OFFICE OF THE RESIDENT AGENT ON MAY 21,2015
1.????EMIL Malak SERVED MAY 4, 2015
....................................................
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., et al. vs. VOIP-PAL.COMq, INC., et al. CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT. NO.: 25
having heard and considered the testimony, evidence, proof and arguments offered by the respective 4 parties and the cause then having been submitted to the Jury for decision, the Jury being fully advised 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18
in the premises; and having duly rendered its verdict, in favor of the above-named Plaintiff Locksmith Financial Corporation, and against the Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett on the cause of action of breach of fiduciary duty; and having rendered its verdict in favor of above-named Third-Party Counterclaimant TK Investment, Ltd. and against the Defendant VOIP-Pal.com, Inc. on the claim of unjust enrichment; and having awarded Defendants nothing by way of their counterclaims and third-party claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment be entered in favor of
Plaintiff Locksmith ·Financial Corporation and against Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang, Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett, on the claim of Breach of Fiduciary
Duty, in the amount of $355,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest from May 21, 2015 in the amount of
$91 .306.17 (calculation attached as "Exhibit 1").
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment is entered in favor the
19 Third-Party Plaintiff TK Investment, Ltd. and against Defendant VOIP-Pal.com, Inc., on the claim of
20 Unjust Enrichment, 1n the amount of $84,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest from January 29, 2019 in 21 the amount of $3,456.53 (calculation attached as "Exhibit 1"). 22 I I I
23 Ill 24 Ill 25 I I I 26 I I I 27 I I I 28
3
.................................
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., et al. vs. VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., et al. CASE NO.: A-15-717491-C DEPT. NO.: 25
2 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That judgment is entered in favor of 4 Counterdefendants and Third-Party Defendants, against Counterclaimant and Third-Party Defendant, 5 respectively. 6 7 8 9 10 Submitted by:
d3d DATED this day of
11 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL E. SMITH, ESQ., P.C. :~~~~
14 Randall Tindall (6522)
1515 E. Tropicana Ave., Ste 530 15 LasVegas,Nevada 89119
16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Third-Party Defendants
and Third-Party Plaintiff
17 Approved as to form and content by:
18 19 20 21 Kurt R. Bonds (6228)
OR& SANDERS
22 Adam R. Knecht (13166)
6605 Grand Montecito Pkwy 23 Las Vegas, Nevada 89149
24 MALEK MOSS PLLC
25 Kevin N. Malek (pro hac vice)
340 Madison Avenue, FL 19 26 New York, New York 10173
27 Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Claimants
28
4
............................
2 , _)
4 5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
EXHIBIT 1
?, ~-'
24 25 26 27 28
5
........................
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Period Beginning:
05/2112015 1 07/0112015 01/0112016 07/0112016 01/0112017 07/01/2017 01/01/2018 07/01/2018 I 01/01/2019 07/01120 19j
INTEREST CALCUALTION
Prime
Judgment Interest
Interest
Rate ( 0/o) Rate (Prime + 2°/o)
3.25 5.25 3.25
5.25 3.50 5.50 3.50 5.50 3.75 5.75 4.25 6.25 4.50 6.50 5.00
7.00 5.50 7.50 5.50 7.50 TOTALS:
27 1 Calculated from date of service of summons, May 21, 2015 Calculated from date Counterclaim was filed, January 29, 2019 Calculated through Aug. 16, 2019 date ofjury verdict
28
6
$ Interest on $355,000.00
4,594.54 9,318.75 9,762.50 9,762.50 10,206.25 11,093.75 11,537.50 12,425.00 13,312.50 3,428.42 91,306.17
$ Interest on $84,000.00
2,645.302
811.23 3,456.53
Wrong again. I did "choose" to exclude anything. I simply entered search for definition of the word and that was the top definition that came up with the main definition listed first as is normally the case. You can speak for him if that's your thing but you cannot speak for me.
Also fyi, I'm not a negative person. I'm an accomplished person and have a generally positive attitude. Not being positive about a company I think is bogus is not a negative person. It simply means my sentiment about the company is no longer a positive sentiment. If you or he thinks that is what makes a person be a negative person, I won't say I'm surprised. And being critical about vplm or anything else for that matter is not a bad thing fyi. It's what makes the world go round. Lot to learn it seems.
I'm actually positive. Very positive.....that this carnival called vplm is an front for the managements personal ATM as well as the supporting cabal. Very positive and very backed up with logic and facts and dd.
Thankyou for your opinion.
I fully agree and always have, that the belieber/buyers are the emu's best friends and what keeps this turkey going. It's fine if it works. More often than not, in my opinion, it's not working for the vast majority, which in turn is reflected in the usual hallmark of vplm, the falling pps. I also, by default, don't believe any personal buy/sell/profits/position/holdings stats given. Maybe it helps someone but for the life of me, I would think only the author as I don't see any way it could be of help to anyone else. The copy/pasting of records is more believable but these days, anything can be faked. Besides, I think it's personal business of the owner.
Definition of red herring:
A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion. A red herring may be used intentionally, as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g., in politics), or may be used in argumentation inadvertently.
The original comment was somehow supposed to be making the point that the mentioned steps and actions were the ways and means to get to trial, etc. I did not disagree with that and so I countered that I had not only not said anything in the past to differ with those conclusions but also that I had not seen anyone else disagree with those conclusions either. Thus, making it sound as tho he was opposing me and my conclusions with those posted, which I did not disagree with......was a dictionary definition example of a red herring. Perfect use of the term in that instance.
kaboomski
You say we're getting there... I say we're not. You may think we're getting there, but I say that's an illusion. We may be getting there but not to the place you think.
As to "very slow, exceedingly careful process", I've covered that so many times, it's obviously a waste of time to answer to it anymore as you either don't read it or don't get it or don't agree, so I'll say only that the slow careful process has proven itself to be invalid, no less that patience is a virtue or best position ever. Those epithets are useless to me, meaning only excuses and are part of the smoke and mirrors that I don't believe in.
As to "boom back at you", you're copying me rather than feeling it's something negative or sophomoric. Also, boom means there, I've made my big point. It's the same as "mic drop". It's just an expression and is widely used usually by adults and not high school student, not that high school student are necessarily dumb, which is how you couched it. When I say boom or other similar, I'm just proud of what I said. There is no need to copy me or feel the need to "get back at me" for saying it, or to disparage. I write very well and know the proper use of words or characterizations. Simply a exclamation!
boomshaka
I have not seen any argument that the patents are not valid or that claim construction wasn't positive for vplm or that vplm hasn't taken the steps necessary to go to trial. Noop. Have never seen any of that in dispute. Red herring
Yes hater means hater. Hater derives from hate.
Definition of a "hater"
noun. a person who has an intense dislike for another person or thing (often used in combination): I'm a big hater of opera. Are you a dog-hater? Informal. a person who thrives on showing hate toward, criticizing, or belittling other people or things, usually unfairly: The guy is just a hater, looking for a fight.
https://www.dictionary.com › browse
Hater Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
The "amazing position" of vplm is really not so amazing. That's just a hope and beli ef latched onto. The real position for well over 10 yrs is that of a share printing share selling, personal enrichment operation that has been successful only in that regard for all these yrs. The rest is nothing more than a hyperbolic story created by vplm to sell shares and and get new shareholders and pay lawyers and other "support" peeps. Real companies in real amazing best positions ever and who are truly worth billions, are able to sell their products and/or license their products and/or collect settlements...
boom
It makes zero sense to call ppl that have a different point of view than yourself, "haters". My assessment of vplm is not based on hate, it's based on facts, opinions, past history, etc etc and many years of dd as well as experience. Those things do not equate to hate. That's ridiculous. If someone had a personal grudge against a company and no dog in the fight or any fair reason to comment on that company, but did anyway, just for spite, then that would be an emotional reaction and maybe could be called hate for it's own sake, but when shareholders such as myself or even non shareholders give their opinion of the company and it's a negative opinion but at least supported by honest ideas, opinions and facts, then "haters" is just not appropriate. No sense to that whatsoever. Negative viewpoints are as valid as positive viewpoints. If you can't see that, then there's an inherent problem.
I guess you just can't see the flaw in that statement. Sure, normally, you would expect that but the vplm story and situation is not normal or typical. Your statement assumes that the patents are all that. When I say that, don't make the mistake of thinking I'm talking about validity. That been explained a million times. The patents are valid. There is no question of that and there cannot be any question of that. If they weren't valid they wouldn't be patents. Anyone that ever questions the validity of the patents doesn't know what they're talking about. That said, valid patents does not make them be all that vplm has promised and touted them to be, in terms of efficacy, need, compatibility or value. My opinion is that they are not and the companies being accused of infringement also don't believe they are, therefore there will not be any settlement. And for that very same reason, is why there has never been any last settlements. Most importantly, if any companies were gonna settle they logically would have done so long ago so as not to allow themselves to have to pay higher and higher amount of settlement. Logically, as more time passes and trials get closer, the settlement amount naturally climbs. And that's not to mention that if they choose to settle and not buy vplm, then they are choosing to be slaves to whoever buys it because they will then BEHOLDING to the buyer.
"There's a reason why every single voip service provider out there thinks the exact same borg mentality and don't take advantage of what is supposed to be believed about it being worth upwards of a trillion dollars or more."
No one speaks for me and no one can twist my words or out words in my mouth.
What vplm is doing is trying to pull the biggest bluff ever........and it's destined to backfire
"Gazillions" is yet another of the countless lies and/or twisting of words due to a lacking of ammunition. I said "a trillion or more" and that is not an exaggeration. Had the facts been actually read here, I have already broken it down as to the reality of upwards of a trillion dollars using emu's own published figures and timezing them against 50 to 60 big dogs and then applying all the various dimensions of how the ownership of then patents could be exploited. In fact I have delineated this at least once or twice here. These sane infos get ignored then are not understood when the particular issue comes up. Trillion or more is not only conservative all aspects considered, but is based on the emu's revised template that most have forgotten or don't even know about because they don't pay attention to the details. Of course all above is a moot point anyway, because it's all based on the silly fairytale that the patents are what vplm cracked them up to be but aren't really
There will be no monetary or otherwise judgements for vplm. But y'all will still be hearing all this empty, non productive talk for the next 7 to 8 yrs that it'll go on for, minimum. It's smoke and mirrors. Witchcraft. Bullshit stories. A big mirage filled with promises that will never fruit. There's a perfectly good reason that the alleged technology test results were never released. That's important but ignored or diminished. There's a reason all then companies told vplm to go pound salt and no evidence of infringement has ever been shown. There's a reason why as things get closer, the management sells and sells and sells like there's no tomorrow, ignoring what it's doing for the price available to the bread and butter shareholders. There's a reason why some believe in this fairy tale even tho it's far too good to be true. There's a reason the sec warns against plays exactly like this.
There's a reason why every single voip service provider out there thinks the exact same borg mentality and don't take advantage of what is supposed to be believed about it being worth upwards of a trillion dollars or more. That's never happened in history because human nature doesn't allow for it. Especially no with these cutthroat big dogs. They would never in a zillion years let any and all of their competitors get a keg up so easily on them. Never in human history have these things gone down this way. The dots simply don't connect.
Many more left handed monkey wrenches to come. Keep your helmits on
As I have explained in detail so many times, the outcomes of the IPRs were not in any way nor ever will be, wins in the usual sense of the word. Calling them wins is nothing more than misdirection or misunderstanding of the events true meaning.
The IPR challenges were defeated which left vplm exactly no more and no less than what they had before they went to court of, for that matter, what they had the moment the patent applications were approved which isn't that hard to do, as history has shown. Many ppl since, have expressed the idea that they think vplm not only won something, which they did not, but that those successful defenses of the challenges somehow show that the patents are "all that" and have need, have efficacy and value. Not so on all counts. Again, the only thing won, if it must be referred to as a win, is that they were successful at defending against the many challenge put to it. I can understand how some think that constitutes a win, but when you win something, generally you have something to show for that win that you didn't have going in. As I said, nothing, absolutely nothing was gained. Had it gone the other way, for sure the challengers wouldn't then be true winners because they would have something to show for it, ie, they would've invalidated the patent or some part. So in that case, there is a definite winner and a definite loser. But a successful beat of a challenge leaves you with the same as you had from minute one.
Same goes for.all the rest of it. There have been challenges and trials and hearings and threats and letters and all sorts and sundry sabre rattling and super lawyer maneuverings, for years and years but nary a plugged nickel has ever been produced for the retail shareholder by any of that and likely never will because it's all a front and talk talk talk delay delay delay all designed to generate and keep the shares and bucks flowing to their intended targets. And that has always worked well ever since the not so smart shareholders allowed vplm to get away with their blatant lies. They did so out of vreed because they were convinced, ironically, by vplm again, that the money would be coming their way in short order and in big amounts via a sale. They weren't even interested in the plan B which made so much more sense. But that's because the whole deal was just a ploy, a front, real good story. A play Madoff would've been proud to have created.