Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Uh-oh.... I can see the .011's from my house!
Nah... The dynamics and underlying drives, impetus and results are totally different beteeen an ipr trial and an infringement trial. One has no bearing on the other. There will be no trial wins for Vplm imo
Generally, you don't keep good things secret. Bad things are always kept secret.
YOU DECIDE!
LOOK OUT BELOWWWWWWWWW!
Coward? I'm sorry, but not deserving of that much credit...
Not really. It's actually old news that I've reported on here several times in the past. It's that Scottsdale firm that got busted for mishandling of shares from 3 companies and Vplm was one of them.
But when you have jerkoffs wrapped around your finger, button pushing is all part of the fun....
I think RK might've been involved in that case, as well as Locksmith. There was an appeal in 2018 and all I know is that Finra, was found to be wrong in their decision. The case may or may not still be open. Obviously, Vplm was looked at. I wouldn't be surprised if someday, that are found to be involved nefariously, just because I think they're crooks.
Quote:
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil charges against Salt Lake City clearing firm Alpine Securities Corp., claiming that it facilitated stock manipulation and other schemes run through a related firm, Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corp. Among other things, Alpine failed to report scores of suspicious transactions, the SEC claims. The SEC has not named the specific stocks involved, but Scottsdale previously received a $1.5-million fine in connection with three companies, with the list including a Vancouver company called Voip Pal.com Inc. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)
VPLM.....OTC SCAM OF THE DECADE!
Madoff is pissed... He wants emu down there with him...
Oops... Now we're into the .012's. Damn close to subpennies again. I guess all those who keep talking about how the pps is about to explode, their heads are exploding... All they're doing is manipulating the price to get yall to start buying again. That's the way the Vplm ball bounces...
I thought it was only $40k but I'm prolly mistaken. It was reported here a few mos back. I thought I had seen $40k on the 10q. Regardless, whatever it was, it wasn't anything for us.. Emu is like a black hole.
Voip-Pal.Com Announces Plans to Increase Damage Demands in
Lawsuits vs Apple, Verizon and AT&T
Company preparing responses to new petitions for Inter Partes Review
May 15, 2017 -- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (“Voip-Pal,” the “Company”) (OTCQB:VPLM) announced their intent to increase the damage
claims in its lawsuits against Apple, Verizon and AT&T. Over the past few months, the Company has been reevaluating the initial
damage calculation claims made in its February 2016, lawsuits against Apple, Inc, in the United States District Court, District of
Nevada case number 2:16-CV-00260, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and AT&T Corp. in the United States District Court,
District of Nevada, case number 2:16-cv-00271. Voip-Pal has determined its initial claim for damages was calculated using a
significantly lower royalty monetization model than has been used in actual court awards of recent patent infringement cases.
Voip-Pal remains cautiously conservative with its newly revised calculations, using an amount 25% below actual recent court
awards for damages. Upon the lifting of the current stay pending the completion of the instituted Inter Partes Reviews expected later
this year, the Company may file an amended pleading to reflect the more accurate damage calculation model.
Utilizing the updated damages award calculation methods, the revised total damages sought by Voip-Pal from Apple would rise from
more than two billion dollars ($2,836,710,031) , to more than twenty-five billion dollars ($25,642,557,840) .
An award in Voip-Pal’s favor may also include additional punitive damages awarded by the court, up to triple damages increasing
the newly revised potential maximum total award to Voip-Pal to over one hundred two billion dollars ($102,570,231,360) .
Applying the updated damage award calculation method to Verizon and AT&T, the current damages sought from Verizon of more
than two billion dollars ($2,382,872,100) would increase to over seventeen billion dollars ($17,262,042,011) .
The current damages sought from AT&T would increase from more than one billion dollars ($1,804,795,745) to over thirteen billion
dollars ($13,540,863,431) .
Applying the maximum potential punitive damages, increases the maximum potential award from Verizon to more than sixty-nine
billion dollars ($69 billion) .
Applying the maximum potential punitive damages, increases the maximum potential award from AT&T to more than fifty-four billion
dollars ($54 billion) .
The complete monetization analyses and damage calculation methodologies are linked below.
The Company also reports the filing of five more petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR) from AT&T and Apple. The deadline for filing
an IPR petition by Apple, Verizon and AT&T was May 9, 2017, one year from the date of the completion of service of process to the
defendants.
On May 8, 2017, AT&T filed the following three petitions for Inter Partes Review: IPR2017-01382, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No.
8,542,815, IPR2017-01383, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005, and IPR2017-01384, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005.
On May 9, 2017, Apple filed the following two petitions for Inter Partes Review: IPR2017-01399, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No.
8,542,815, and IPR2017-01398 against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005.
Voip-Pal CEO Emil Malak stated, “We will continue to vigorously defend these challenges to our technology and protect the interests
of our shareholders. Once the stay is lifted we will make a final determination on amending the asserted damages of our lawsuits
with Apple, Verizon and AT&T.”
“We are now faced with defending five new IPR’s, three filed by ATT and two filed by Apple, all on the same two patents we have
been defending for the past year. We are confident we will prevail based on the merits. We appreciate the patience of our
shareholders and we assure them we will persevere to a successful end.”
Next Article
Apple Royalty Monetization Analysis.............................................................
Verizon Royalty Monetization Analysis..........................................................
AT&T Royalty Monetization Analysis.............................................................
______________________________
*** $103 billion for just 3 companies in this revised damages template. And that was like 6 or 7 yrs ago, lololol......and Vplm named 60 companies! And I personally identified at least 100 voip service providers years ago. There are likely many more out there and lord emu said that all voip service providers were automatically infringers. So that means that my years old estimate of damages being worth in the range of $1 trillion, I was right on the money! Except the context.....the all important context is that's all nothing more than fantasy math and money. The real value in this point is it shows that with money like that at stake.........no company on earth, WOULD LET THAT KIND OF RISK HANG OVER THEIR HEAD AND THEY WOULD'VE EITHER PURCHASES THE PATENTS........OR..........LICENCED......... OR Settled!!!
Atltraderken
Re: nyt post# 129405
Wednesday, 04/17/2024 1:33:13 AM
"Keep selling NYT....We have buyers sucking up stock at all prices. We already ran ORCA off, he said we would see .005. Next is you...whats your price target? WE WILL NOT CLOSE BELOW .0135.....loser!“
______________________
Meanwhile....few days later.....pps was below .0135 all day long and indeed has closed at . 0132
BOINK... BOINK... BOINK!
AND......
That whole bullshit story about silver and the short squeeze and how Vplm would be on the giddyup........HAS NOW BEEN OFCICIALLY......
BOINKED AND DEBUNKED.........
JUST AS I CALLED IT LAST WEEK
bada-bing...bada-boom
NEXT.....
"however, if only 34% of those appeals were reversed, that means that a whopping 66% of those appeals failed to achieve a reversal at the appellate level. Those odds favor the plaintiff in Albright's Western District court."
______________________________
Surprise, surprise........and that's what I mean by "monkey wrenches"...
Like Roseanne Roseannadanna's daddy used to say: "it's ALWAYS SOMETHING!"
Boy, that silver short squeeze is really doin the trick....lol, duh
Good ol "billions and billions", Vplm, matched the yearlong low this morn. It also showed the fraud of "it will not go below .0135".
Where's my damn 50 cents?
You might add a new twist, such as when they not only do that, but also inform the shareholders THAT ANYTHING EVEN HAPPENED! hahahaha lololol.
remember the Amazon!
Atltraderken
Re: nyt post# 129405
Wednesday, 04/17/2024 1:33:13 AM
Keep selling NYT....We have buyers sucking up stock at all prices. We already ran ORCA off, he said we would see .005. Next is you...whats your price target? WE WILL NOT CLOSE BELOW .0135.....loser!!
_________________________________________
Another one bites the dust. Few minutes ago, price was .013
Another soothsayer for yall to look up to...
I think that's low of year, no? What a company..... I know, I know.......another buying opportunity........
Rocket Docket is more like a rock at the end of the dock...
Oh, and gotta luv how that predicted silver market did it's thing to pump up vplm......um.....to what.....lowest pps in 2 mos? Boy, was that one lame...
Next....
So glad to hear you didn't have any personal catastrophe connected to the fires. Sad, the suicides. Glad I didn't quote you wrong as you'd likely be wringing my neck if I did, whew... Lol... The one lesson I've learned about stocks, ESPECIALLY otc pennystocks and uber especially a company that's never made a dime other than for themselves...and I'm assuming you might now be in agreement.....is I would never ever ever recommend the buying or selling of stocks. I have to assume that in the case of otherwise intelligent peeps, it happens regardless, due to buying into the hype which in some cases like Vplm, HUGE hype for untold riches, which then in turn is proudly shared with friends and family as though it's a sure enough thing that it's almost a gift. I mean I doubt highly yo would've pumped it to them if you didn't believe in it like religion, lol. Hopefully, they took as much responsibility for it being such a loser and no love lost.
At this point I guess I should offer my own disclaimer in terms of look....i could be wrong. Wouldnt be the 1st time but when i feel as strongly as I do against the company and the patents, in any area, I usually turn out to be right, Based more on common sense and intuition than stock trading expertise. But I have indeed been closely studying every aspect I could wrap my head around on this company and done an awful lot of DD. For me, all the dots connect for too scammy in my view. I call it like I see it. Goofy ppl accuse of being paid basher and everything else under the sun. I have owned shares for over 11 or 12 years so I'd be tickled pink if some miracle occurred and I definitely would categorize as a true miracle with this personal I spider ATM. It honestly brings me no joy to be so negative about Vplm. I recall very well your high degree of positive thinking. Believe it or not, I too believe in the power of positive thinking but I think short of your level. What I mean is, my perception of your brand was you think that loser can turn around things that are inherently negative. I think that goes too far because if something isn't good inside, then I don't think God or nature or the universe has any interest in turning it into good. That said I wholly am for supporting of anything you truly believe in, with fairness and balance applied.
I think I aggravated you with my 100% honest belief that vplm was not what they have been cracked up to be. I have never posted anything with the intention to aggravate, except in the case of rude, name calling, self absorbed jerks.
I sure hope that something can happen whereby you can at least recoup a significant amt of your investment. But at this point, due to the boy who cried wolf thingy, even announcement of settlements has little to no positive effect. We just went thru that and the IR dude told shareholders that it was a good settlement for shareholders. That was obviously a lie and not his 1st one I know of. All that said, there could possibly be the one more spike left. BIG maybe on that one. So you should keep as close a watch on it as is practical for you or just enter a sell order with the appropriate limits applied. Then you can just kick back and hope for the best. I haven't bought any stocks in awhile so I don't know the current limitations your broker may have on limit sells!
Good luck on your retirement plans!
Hello KG... nice to hear from you. Hope all is well. I cannot remember if your exit from the msg board was before or after the fires... and so I don't know how you may or may not have faired in that regard. No doubt it affected you in some way. I hope not too negatively. I have some business associate there as well but he and his family were far away on a different island. I assume you saw my reply to someone who asked about you.. I hope I didn't tell them wrongly. I thought you had said something to the effect of basically having enough of this never ending debacle. Apologies if I quoted you incorrectly. You should be able to click back and answer that person yourself now. I'm sure he'll be glad to hear from you beings he inquired in the 1st place. Well, to answer your question, there are still a few, some, I don't know how many who still have full belief and faith in it. As you can see the pps is same ol downward direction. Lord emu of eGipped, as I like to refer to the ceo and his wife have been selling their shares by the zillions on an almost daily basis for a long time. Obviously, that hasn't sat well with many from either side of the isle. There was supposed to be a settlement with Amazon months ago but it was kept on the DL and eventually it was revealed to be a relatively tiny amount of cash that went straight to management pockets. There have been I believe several settlements that have been pretty much kept secret and gave nothing to pps or shareholders. So several cases were closed by mutual agreement and it did nothing for us shareholders. I can't remember if you you cashed out or not. Still daily die hards keep predicting and swearing up and down that vplm is on the verge of ship coming in. Can't reason with them. Trial dates continuously keep getting pushed back. Not sure. Might be one scheduled near year end or next year. I don't pay much mind to those dates as I see them in a negative light. I'm sure someone will provide more and better details if you want.
Aloha and best of luck
Voip-Pal.Com Announces Plans to Increase Damage Demands in
Lawsuits vs Apple, Verizon and AT&T
Company preparing responses to new petitions for Inter Partes Review
May 15, 2017 -- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (“Voip-Pal,” the “Company”) (OTCQB:VPLM) announced their intent to increase the damage
claims in its lawsuits against Apple, Verizon and AT&T. Over the past few months, the Company has been reevaluating the initial
damage calculation claims made in its February 2016, lawsuits against Apple, Inc, in the United States District Court, District of
Nevada case number 2:16-CV-00260, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and AT&T Corp. in the United States District Court,
District of Nevada, case number 2:16-cv-00271. Voip-Pal has determined its initial claim for damages was calculated using a
significantly lower royalty monetization model than has been used in actual court awards of recent patent infringement cases.
Voip-Pal remains cautiously conservative with its newly revised calculations, using an amount 25% below actual recent court
awards for damages. Upon the lifting of the current stay pending the completion of the instituted Inter Partes Reviews expected later
this year, the Company may file an amended pleading to reflect the more accurate damage calculation model.
Utilizing the updated damages award calculation methods, the revised total damages sought by Voip-Pal from Apple would rise from
more than two billion dollars ($2,836,710,031) , to more than twenty-five billion dollars ($25,642,557,840) .
An award in Voip-Pal’s favor may also include additional punitive damages awarded by the court, up to triple damages increasing
the newly revised potential maximum total award to Voip-Pal to over one hundred two billion dollars ($102,570,231,360) .
Applying the updated damage award calculation method to Verizon and AT&T, the current damages sought from Verizon of more
than two billion dollars ($2,382,872,100) would increase to over seventeen billion dollars ($17,262,042,011) .
The current damages sought from AT&T would increase from more than one billion dollars ($1,804,795,745) to over thirteen billion
dollars ($13,540,863,431) .
Applying the maximum potential punitive damages, increases the maximum potential award from Verizon to more than sixty-nine
billion dollars ($69 billion) .
Applying the maximum potential punitive damages, increases the maximum potential award from AT&T to more than fifty-four billion
dollars ($54 billion) .
The complete monetization analyses and damage calculation methodologies are linked below.
The Company also reports the filing of five more petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR) from AT&T and Apple. The deadline for filing
an IPR petition by Apple, Verizon and AT&T was May 9, 2017, one year from the date of the completion of service of process to the
defendants.
On May 8, 2017, AT&T filed the following three petitions for Inter Partes Review: IPR2017-01382, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No.
8,542,815, IPR2017-01383, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005, and IPR2017-01384, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005.
On May 9, 2017, Apple filed the following two petitions for Inter Partes Review: IPR2017-01399, against Voip-Pal’s Patent No.
8,542,815, and IPR2017-01398 against Voip-Pal’s Patent No. 9,179,005.
Voip-Pal CEO Emil Malak stated, “We will continue to vigorously defend these challenges to our technology and protect the interests
of our shareholders. Once the stay is lifted we will make a final determination on amending the asserted damages of our lawsuits
with Apple, Verizon and AT&T.”
“We are now faced with defending five new IPR’s, three filed by ATT and two filed by Apple, all on the same two patents we have
been defending for the past year. We are confident we will prevail based on the merits. We appreciate the patience of our
shareholders and we assure them we will persevere to a successful end.”
Next Article
Apple Royalty Monetization Analysis.............................................................
Verizon Royalty Monetization Analysis..........................................................
AT&T Royalty Monetization Analysis.............................................................
"Analysts report that more than 95% of patents are worthless-- not because patents as a class are worthless, but because companies fail to understand one simple principle that makes patents powerful"
Jun 24, 2020
ARTICLE
The One Secret Everyone Needs to Know About Patents
June 24, 2020
The Association of Engineers & Architects in Israel Newsletter
By Gerson S. Panitch
This is a true story. A highly innovative Israeli component manufacturer in the mobility space had a big problem. It employed some of the smartest minds in its industry who developed solutions that were incorporated into OEM products worldwide. By international standards, the Israeli company was small, but it punched far above its weight, so much so, that the last eight generations of OEM products incorporated the Israeli company’s innovations.
So why was this such a big problem? None of the large OEMs purchased the Israeli company’s products. Instead, year after year, the OEMs copied the Israeli company’s innovations. The Israeli company thought its products were well protected with over 15 U.S. patents and many more patents worldwide. But its patents could not stop the copying.
This story is not unique to this particular company or this particular industry. Many companies in Israel and around the world have similar problems. Analysts report that more than 95% of patents are worthless-- not because patents as a class are worthless, but because companies fail to understand one simple principle that makes patents powerful. To understand, it is helpful to take a step back and first consider the differences between strong and weak patents.
Strong patents have one important function: blocking competitors from offering competing products. Achieving this is more difficult than it sounds because every time a company develops and patents a valuable new solution, smart competitors try to find ways to offer a similar product with a different solution that avoids the patents. Consider machine-vision driver assist systems. A number of companies offer competitive products, each using a different technical solution. In many cases, they have found ways to avoid each other’s patents, because most of the patents are highly technical, and competitors are often able to find another technical solution to achieving the same goal. In other words, patenting specific technical solutions often makes for weak patents.
In contrast to weak patents that are technical in nature, strong patents are conceptual in nature. That is, those who are able to generalize their inventions to cover the goal itself rather than a limited technical solution for achieving that goal, can block all the competitors’ pathways to offering a competing product.
Apple demonstrated this idea in a patent that it received for unlocking a cell phone using facial recognition. Apple realized that before unlocking the phone, it needed some indication of the user’s desire to unlock. Otherwise, the phone might unlock if the camera picked up an image of the user’s face while the phone sat idly on a table, for example. So Apple patented the concept of capturing the facial image only after the phone is moved in a manner indicative of a desire to unlock the phone. If Apple had specified the algorithm of motion detection, or specified a type of motion sensor needed to ascertain the user’s intent, a competitor could have used a different algorithm or could have employed a different sensor to avoid the patent. This example demonstrates that patent value may be generated when the patent strategist steps away from the technical details, and realizes that despite the pride with which the inventors describe those details, including them in the scope of protection often provides competitors with an easy way to avoid patent infringement. Thus, the ability to conceptually protect an invention is often much more powerful than a typical technical approach to patenting.
Although the conceptual approach may seem like a logical way to patent, most companies fail to do it successfully. One analyst anecdotally reported that after examining over 3,000 patents from a few hundred startup companies, he could find only about three patents in the entire lot that had any appreciable value. The vast majority of patents tended to be too narrow to block competitors. This happens when companies use patenting methodologies that result in technical, rather than conceptual patents.
If your company is like most, the decision on what to patent is left in the hands of engineers. This leads to two challenges. First, engineers who arrive at brilliant technical solutions tend to focus on patenting those solutions. Many do not realize that patent law allows broader conceptual protection for the invention. The patent attorneys do what they are told, and write technical patents. In this way, companies can create expensive patent portfolios with very little value.
The second challenge is that the engineering leadership who make patenting decisions are often experts in their field. This poses a challenge because experts tend to quickly dismiss as unpatentable broad concepts that are in fact patentable. The author’s clients regularly obtain valuable patents over the initial objections of engineers who see their own conceptual ideas as obvious. Under the law, a patent may be granted if the invention is not obvious to a “person of ordinary skill in the art.” An expert’s view on what is obvious should never be the litmus test for patenting decisions.
The solution is to adopt a business-driven approach to patenting where a hand-picked group of the company’s technical and business visionaries shift the focus of patenting from what the inventors find most interesting to the revenue streams that need to be protected in order for the company to gain exclusivity in its market. Then, working together with a patent strategist skilled in conceptual protection, patents can be tested before they are written to determine whether, if granted, they are likely to accomplish a critical business goal. The concepts that pass the test become the company’s key patent assets. Those that don’t, are discarded. In this way, companies can avoid wasting money on patents less likely to make a difference, skewing the patent portfolio to the gems likely to drive higher valuation.
Engineers can contribute greatly to this process by asking themselves the question, “assuming my competitor were to get this patent , would it stop our company from competing in the market?” If the answer is, “no,” the patent needs to be broadened before it is filed to define the invention more conceptually.
And engineers need to fight the inclination to view conceptual inventions as obvious. It’s the Patent Office Examiner’s job to raise objections, and it’s the company’s job to fight hard to obtain commercially valuable protection.
1st, lord emu of eGipped invented the coolest self enrichment device ever and called it the "anti dilution clause"... Now he's outdone himself by inventing the "anti settlement, settlements"... Perfectly in line with the PROCESS! .
...and you all will get to the back of the bus, sit down and LIKE IT!
GUARANTEED
The BIG PICTURE, obviously, is the 27 YEARS of retail shareholders getting raked across the coals with bullshit BIG LIES the company ran on us to build their Madoff style personal ATM. That a long long time, regardless of if you want to look at it as a whole, from the beginning or from the time of the name change or even if you want to focus solely on the acquisition era, which is around 12/13 years or so. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter that there were personnel changes either. It's all been bad. And they all knew ea other early on and were friends and co-operatives in developing the ideas that became what this is...... A BIG NOTHING FOR MOST SHAREHOLDERS and a go fund us page for the inside which became, as we have all seen, their personal ATM.
THAT'S THE BIG PICTURE. They have been involved one way or another in tons of litigation, infighting with past partners, many hearings of all kinds, promises, promises, promises......out and out bold faced lies in the form of PRs, a never ending parade of an army of lawyers, judges, panels, and the supporting cabal. Botton line after all said and done, is most are underwater and the patents have PROVEN themselves to be worthless since their creation over 15 yrs ago. Company can't make a dime ever except for their own pockets. The so called IR guy has only worked for loser OTC pennystocks that have all been duds to my knowledge. The pps bias is ALWAYS downward. There's been a couple pump driven and ipr driven speculative spikes which last for 5 minutes then ALWAYS head back down where it started or lower. The pro sides got nothing except their copycat mantras of "patience is a virtue" and "best position ever", both promulgated by those with self interest and then copy catted for yrs and year's. The company, fully knowing about the bleeding and fully knowing about the affect their selling has had on general shareholder morale, supported by years of fake infomercial so called conference calls, bs PRs, paid so called eZine articles, videos, etc etc.
The bottom line and one that reeks common sense is that if the patents were all that, they'd have been jumped on many times over plus all sorts of licensing, settlements and partnerships. Most don't want to admit it's a big ol farce, especially if they have alot invested. If lord emu of eGipped REALLY was the fiduciary minded ceo he wants you to believe, he wouldn't be so quiet and failing majorly in letting you, the peeps who funded his dream scene. He has shown total disrespect for the retail shareholders, in my opinion.
Where's my 50cents?
Yup.... Vplm knows the PROCESS allright! They have executed it flawlessly.
What's in your wallet? Ooops, no, wallet, ya been PICKPOCKETED! SHAME ON THE MESS.
SELL YOUR HOUSES.....SELL THE FARM....... SELL WHATEVER YA GOT......... LORD EMU NEEDS YOUR MONEY. HE AND QUEEN SELLSALOT HAVE A LIFESTYLE TO MAINTAIN! GIVE GENEROUSLY TO THE LORD EMU GO FUND ME PAGE! Don't let the company fall by the wayside. Don't force poor babs to move in with Tammy Faye Baker! Oh the humanity...
Not surprising....nothing but selling from the insiders...for their own personal enrichment.....and selling from the the s/h's as evidenced by the continuously falling pps. Nearing the year low as all concerned realize the junk they hold. Downward pressure for 2 straight mos. Look at the chart, and frankly, downward pressure for the entire 27 year history. Upticks are NEVER EVER MAINTAINED. The sime reason is Vplm ain't got what it takes EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO THE BIG, MEAN, GREEN, FIAT SHARE PRINTING/SELLING INSIDER PERSONAL ATM!
ALL THE DOTS CONNECT....
Amazon settlement..... Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaahlolololololol
I think I'll start selling snorkels here.....and scuba gear.. so many vplm shareholders underwater it's a shame..... There will be a special for the "deserving", they will pay treble. Lol
Forgot to add this stuff yest re: uspto/ptab that is so revered.
____________________________________
https://ipwatchdog.com/2021/03/29/the-ptabs-concerning-conflict-of-interest-is-laid-bare-in-new-vision-gaming/id=131528/#
“Fees are paid by the petitioner, making the petitioner the true customer of the PTAB. If the odds are small for favorable institution and final decisions, customers will not use the PTAB.”
https://ipwatchdog.com/2016/08/17/uspto-director-lee-sued-declaring-federal-holiday/id=72006/
Ex-USPTO Director Lee Says She Did Not Stack PTAB Panels
With respect to the abundance of ignorance regarding the value of all the ipr decisions of the past, which are held in such high regard by that same ignorance.........those decisions were the result of trials put on by the ptab. The ptab is an arm of the USPTO. To begin with, the USPTO was headed by Michelle Lee who was corrupt and forced out of office. She had to be forced out cuz she just wouldn't leave when it was her time to go. She ignored and defied rulings of the supreme court. She also not only stacked the judge panels but admitted to doing so and tried to justify it. All that came out at the time and if you dig deep enough you'll find these facts. The ptab most likely would've ruled some invalidity of at least some aspects of some patents....BUT.....in stepped Mr Tom Sawyer....who was sick and tired of the PTAB corruption he saw. He sent many letters out to the president, vice president, members of congress, governors, etc, which threatened to bring federal RICO charges against them. That stopped them in their tracks and it then took three, 3 judge panels a full year to finally give unprecedented positive rulings on ALL IPRs, something as far as I know, never had happened before or since. I posted many times here about the 1-2 punch tag team of the uspto/ptab. The both also charge huge fees to rule on and maintain their rulings. Their 1-2 punch tag team has brought in kazillions to the gov coffers. And the patents that the USPTO granted are often invalidated. It all depends on who is being examined and how much money the have to fork over and in the case of Vplm, their hand was forced by the powerful Sawyer letters. And all that above, is above and beyond the fact that the patents are assumed to have full and total validity as soon as they are patented.
I challenged anyone to produce any evidence whatsoever that judges rulings in patent infringement cases, are influenced by ipr decisions. Not one answer to that challenge came. Not surprising.
Haha...speaking of the devil, there's a perfect and timely example of getting one of those nifty new Vplm dictionaries.... The pps has been sliding down for the past 2 mos so the phrase "getting close" would've been reversed or gone thru the Vplm "interpreter" 1st for better clarity...
Good point. Vplm is responsible for single handedly changing the meanings of words.......and in doing so, have also taught, via long term osmosis, the pro crowd (many, not all) to do the same word meaning twisting. I hear that soon, emu will be coming out with the official king emu version of the Vplm dictionary. It comes with a quick start guide that basically tells you to simply reverse the meaning of all vplm and or pro shop crowd and that will suffice.
No one has ever been interested in those bogus patents, you know, the valid 38x over ones....except for digi-phony-ca and voip-fail.....from the git.
Toooo phony....er I mean funny
Vplm would be close to bankruptcy except for the private placement business they do. Biggest, bestes, insider personal ATM machine in the business. Hahaha. Good for them! bad for you.
The only settlements will be in the form like the big Amazon ripoff where Vplm took some pocket money for themselves and said nothing to shareholders, lol. But good ol Richie Rich INYA pockets Inza stated there was a settlement that was good for shareholders. Some of you keep lappin it up... Its hilarious! Vplm comedy store.
We accept your apology <cough, cough> and the company accepts all your generous donations to the lord emu go fund me page! Pay them, pay them, pay them!
That's why she exited from Vplm and moved on to better things. Lololol
For anyone who has been listening to all the pro vplm, I hope you haven’t been swayed by. That’s what they’re there to do! Just sit tight for another 10 years and watch this stock go south! VPLM goin bye bye with your mo mo...
1. Yeah, you right, genius...
2. The reason you're a name caller is because that's the pinnacle of your intellect. Thx for showing everyone.
3. Your time is coming allright.....it has come........AND GONE!..... meep meep
4. Get ready for a other 4 to 5 years of the same 27 year long mirage before they burn themselves out and fade away like all the other OTC failed penny stocks.
5. Start writing down all your name calls lest you forget them and are rendered speechless...
6. Don't forget to buy up as many more shares as you since you're about to cash in.
just sayin
You know how ppl are always saying "I could care less"? I hear it everyday. Let me correct it especially in this case..... I COULDN'T CARE LESS.
Yup, cheap burgers sold here...
I thought to myself, oh, this must be another clueless newbie who likes to jump on a bandwagon and mindlessly preach "patience"......which is a ridiculous and now negative word when spoken in the context of Vplm.... Add to that, I've been a shareholder for 13 or 14 yrs. But then I saw that you've been around almost as long as me, yet you still use that patience word, same as lord emu of eGipped, and it's your whole bag of reason, nothing to validate it or back it up, just what vplm has turned into a truly dirty word, ie, patience.
The fact that you obviously see no timelines or boundaries when defining the practicality of patience, I find amazing and it serves to bolster my belief that those who still cling to it after 27 yrs of failure of this company, are deeply entrenched in mass hypnosis, required to believe in patience for ever and ever into infinity. I know, I know.......theres a "process". Lemme say this about that..... Any so called process that takes that long, and with no real solid end in sight, is not a process, it's an illilusion.
And if you've ever read my overarching explanations for the pathology of why I believe the patents are worthless, then you'd know that above remarks are only symptomatic or part of the residual effects of a well thought out, planned out and superbly executed plan by the emu. You'd see the simple elegant reasoning that nothing.....repeat, NOTHING in this world could have the value and the power been assigned to the patents by Vplm (by the way, did you know that around 5 yrs ago, maybe more, lord emu, with his new and improved, yet still conservative, lolol, damages calculations, based on a far more cohesive set of metrics, was up to approx $102,000,000,000, yes, billions, and that was only for approx 5 of the alleged infringers. I have the documentation of that if you'd like to see it).
Point being that it is 100% against human nature and all common sense, that any of the big dogs that could afford, regardless of purchase, license or settlement......HAVE NOT done so, opting instead (according to the beliebers way of thinking) to sit and wait, as a sitting duck, for the incoming misses and bombs, with THEIR name painted on the side, come screaming in from above to do to them what you see daily now on TV with the "precision bombs".........but wait.....that's not all......they also are saying loudly that they couldn't care less that they are allowing any one of their competitors to swoop in and buy the patents out from under them which could (but won't) happen at ANY moment for who knows how many years past or future. That is simply TOO DUMB on multiple levels, so even if there was some ceo dumb enough to go that route, it's utterly impossible that ALL the deep pocketed voip service providers could think THE SAME WAY, as tho being members of the borg collective, who all share the same thought. Then, to that, you could also add the fact that by not jumping in and taking advantage of such an absolutely priceless treasure, that they are cutting their nose to spite their face.
Never in the history of mankind, is there such a case that resembles above scenario. Never has, never will. Maybe a couple in a far smaller value bracket, like hundreds of millions or even a few billion, but certainly not one that easily could be demonstrated to be worth upwards of a trillion dollars, considering the number of voip service providers in the wild and the fact that vplm clearly stated, years ago, that EVERY SINGLE VOIP SERVICE PROVIDER IS AN INFRINGER.
So, enjoy your patience...and make sure you have a large, years more long, supply.