I'm gone. Like a steam locomotive rolling down the track, I'm gone, gone, and nothing's going to bring me back. I'm gone. 06/29/2023
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
AABB is a hoot if you ever need some uplifting laughter. The fat pumper Chinese pimp guy calls himself BennyMojo who fancies himself famously rich and posts pics of him and his bikini-clad harem of "assistants" on "his" yacht drinking mango margaritas (apparently his preferred libation). I think he called himself momoraptor or something similar on an earlier mining con.
Of course it won't end well but it is a hoot to watch!
AABB is supposedly doing cyber coin/exchange/wallet backed by their own mined gold.
It is scammy as hell, pumped by a guy that looks like a Chinese pimp.
Or survey local jails for incarcerated Chinese pimps.
A company pumps a technology that 99% of the population cannot understand. That is an enormous Total Available Market for shares, especially when there is a subset of that market who will swallow whatever the company says without question, even when questions are published that should give them pause.
I belong to the 1% of the population who does understand the technology. Someone needs to raise the pertinent questions because this one looks like snake oil.
Just a pump 'n dump. Happens all the time on the OTC. Just be sure you find a chair when the music stops!
Conclusion
In today’s Wall Street Bets inhabited stock market, retail investors have lots of power to move a small cap stock, even when it isn’t warranted. The evidence we’ve uncovered indicates to us that LWLG is a case of an enormous, empty rally of a company that has experienced 20 years of failure. There’s nothing to suggest that success is finally right around the corner. We do not see any evidence of technological progress or potential.
Even if the company was closer to success, its $500M+ valuation would still be egregious. As we documented, its competitors that actually have revenues and noted interest from foundries and institutions, have market caps considerably smaller. Retail investors of this type of an investment we call “unproven tech”, have shown to have a lot of patience. However, we don’t believe this valuation will be held up for long. That type of valuation requires results.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4446965-lightwave-logic-recent-500-percent-plus-runup-is-without-substance?mail_subject=lwlg-lightwave-logic-is-a-tiny-glorified-science-lab-recent-500-runup-is-without-substance&utm_campaign=rta-stock-article&utm_content=link-2&utm_medium=email&utm_source=seeking_alpha
The fact that you don't trust the science behind the Moderna mRNA is telling .....
A well written and accurate article.
Lightwave is a lab science project that has never developed a viable product in 20 years and likely never will. But they are selling the crap out of their shares!
Lebby is selling an idea (no product yet). Sundahl represents the people at a semiconductor company who decide whether to purchase the idea or not.
Sundahl says there is added complexity. Enough to make it an unfeasible addition to an IC process. I believe he is correct. He knows what he is talking about.
Bob Sundahl stated:
Data transmission distances have to be significantly larger than an IC to justify this additional complexity.
Buy farmland, young man!!! Bill Gates is on to a winner.
No, to be clear, Sundahl stated:
Data transmission distances have to be significantly larger than an IC to justify this additional complexity.
YOU are complaining about dropdeadfred's post when you repeatedly post stuff like this to other posters?
YOU are a hypocrite! Get off your high horse.
Your "high ground" is entirely shot in your arm, up your nose, or by osmosis via a vodka soaked tampon shoved up your exit hole you morally bereft piece of human excremental leakage.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=165318960
iHub policy is only one board per ticker and if the ticker is changed, the existing board's name is changed to reflect the new ticker. This is enforced rigorously.
As for the rest of your questions, you are on your own as I have no desire to help you or Xu.
Xu is a crook.
Correct, Xu is definitely not incompetent.
Xu is a serial scammer. He does THAT very well.
Making memory chips is different and that's no where near my wheelhouse
Richard, I know you have great hopes and I hope you do well.
But I will not be joining you. There are far too many hurtles and unknowns from capitalization to the technical details I have mentioned to a myriad more I cannot begin to enumerate with 15 posts a day.
It is clear that your knowledge of complex fabrication processes is limited. To assert that the LWLG can simply be "dropped in" to any existing process is simply preposterous.
..... and then pay LWLG a royalty every time a new company emerges that wants to use polymers.
..... the only outside innovation that will be accepted by fabs will be the technologies that integrate into existing fab lines (via PDK) with minimal disruption.
Am I to understand that you believe fabs will continue with business as usual in the midst of an unprecedented growth phase of 500 billion to a 1 trillion dollar chip industry?
I think Lightwave has a real disadvantage when compared to internal solutions developed at the semiconductor manufacturers themselves.
That's why I asked the questions.
..... but much like the electronic chip industry, there is a fairly standard process to make a chip.
Semiconductor manufacturers develop their fab processes internally moving from lab to development fabrication to commercial high volume fabs to "copy exactly" fab expansion.
How much is known here about this development process? I see a lot of mentions of a "PDK" which I assume is an acronym for Process Design Kit.
What is the sales process for convincing a high volume semiconductor manufacturer to drop this PDK into a fab process developed internally? Into a process that is valuable intellectual property?
What are the problems facing an outside photonics firm versus photonics solutions developed at the semi manufacturer in parallel with the development of the new process itself?
I don't see much discussion about this.
..... and when he does it will be a small company. No major company will deal with this Clown.
http://www.asiametalsinc.com/
Then click on "Investors".
..... is not related to AABB
HA! Looks like they removed the stock photo I ran on TinEye a few days ago. No worries though. I just ran another mining photo from the site and it was a stock photo also.
https://tineye.com/search/ef220efbfde413535895a78fda5d1efbe22377d6?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
The AABB Website has pictures of Management and Mines in LOI Status. I don't think those Pictures are Fake either!
Intel is not a partner with ENZC.
They were merely featured in a use case white paper featuring Intel's AI tool kit.
Intel product marketing. Nothing more.
Intel is not a partner with ENZC.
They were merely featured in a use case white paper featuring Intel's AI tool kit.
Intel product marketing. Nothing more.
The jabs contain aborted fetal cells.
It came directly from Don Corleone's Twit account.
Isn't that "official"??
That's not a product review. It is a share pump!
Intel has nothing to "dump".
They featured Enzolytics as a use case for their AI toolkit, nothing more.
Marketing of an Intel product.
It is not that simple:
Q: How quickly does the Tesla Model S’ battery charge?
A: The Model S electric car offers a choice of lithium-ion battery packs, a standard 60-kilowatt-hour battery or a more expensive, more powerful 85-kwh unit. How long it takes to recharge a depleted battery depends on whether the Model S has one or two onboard chargers and the source of the electricity.
Tesla says the 60-kwh battery provides a range of up to 232 miles (the EPA pegs it at 208 miles), and the 85-kwh battery (a $10,000 option) provides up to 300 miles (the EPA puts it at 265 miles). Here are some examples for recharging times: With a single onboard charger plugged into a standard 110-volt outlet, Tesla says you will get 5 miles of range for every hour of charging. From zero to 300 miles would take about 52 hours at that rate. With a single onboard charger connected to a 240-volt outlet, which Tesla recommends, the pace can reach speeds up to 31 miles of range for each hour of charging, meaning a full 300-mile charge takes less than 9.5 hours.
This maximum charge rate from an outlet requires a 240-volt circuit with 40 amps of current. (Adapters allow the supplied charging cord, called a Mobile Connector, to be used with multiple 240-volt outlets [as well as 120 volts], but the charge rate is slower with lower-amp circuits at this voltage.)
Step up to twin chargers in the car and connect to a 240-volt, 90-amp high-power wall charger (an extra-cost charging unit called a Wall Connector, not just a 240-volt line) and the charging speed zooms to 62 miles of range per hour, and the total charging time drops to less than 4 hours, 45 minutes.
Because Teslas require this additional Wall Connector hardware only for the fastest home charging — and don’t rely on external Level 2 chargers — Model S owners can recharge where many electric vehicles cannot. Conversely, Tesla owners can recharge at public Level 2 stations using an adapter, but the charging speed again depends on how many amps the station provides. Most public charging stations can recharge the Model S at the rate of 22 miles of range per hour of charging.
Really in a hurry? Stop at a Tesla Supercharger station and you can achieve a full charge with 300 miles of range in just an hour, as long as your Model S is configured with Supercharger capability. The high-voltage, direct-current Supercharger system is compelling, but don’t try to buy one for your home. It requires 480 volts to deliver up to 120 kilowatts and would cost too much to justify.
You can learn more about the Model S in our review of the 2012 model, here. When that review was written, Tesla was planning to offer a less-expensive model with a 40-kwh battery, but that model and battery were cut from the lineup.
https://www.cars.com/articles/how-quickly-does-the-tesla-model-s-battery-charge-1420663044658/
How long does it take to fill the 22.2 gal gas tank when near empty?
How long does it take to fully charge the 100 Kw battery when nearly depleted?
Therein lies the rub when considering travel over long distances.
There are no mines. There is no gold. There are no tokens. There is no exchange. There are only shares to sell.
Looks like a bona fide fraud to me.