Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What time did you meet her? I will look for it on the Time and Sales.
XXXX Unyson implementation should move the Price Over $2.00 In fist day it is announced as a 100% go, tell than stock does not relflect even the value without it.
Same guy:
bet you may see at Least $2, and much more I get the feeling hey days are coming for the XXXX.
And again:
I call rarely but sometimes call back is always, but never will they ever give out inside info, period, which strengthens my resolve on XXXX. And Having this one Billionaire backing.
Two more:
I Just Think It's related to the Penny Stock Labbel
What About If Rico is announce,what do you think they could earn, hey thanks for your time , appresiate it.
I do like the random caps but my fave is "sometimes call back is always."
thank you so very much, cheer's:)
Wait a second, are you saying that an acquisition price is typically 5-10x the price at which the acquiree's stock is trading?
On what planet?
That snapshot showed activity as of 2:06 PM. You can tell because it says that 1:54 remained until the close.
I just went back and checked my PMs. I sent this to Joby at 4:36 PM that day as part of an exchange of PMs:
"I guess you were the buyer at 2:14. I started off the festivities at .0111 and Rawnoc says he got 268,000 today, so that about covers the day's volume."
So apparently there was a trade at 2:14, immediately before Joby posted here at 2:16 that he had added. Do you (or does anyone) have access to that day's time and sales? I can't go back that far.
Yes, please do check it if you have time. I think we should have all the facts out here if we're going to be casting aspersions on others.
This post shows my 54,000 bid that later got hit:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69413931
This post shows my buy at 13:12, and trades of 80,000 and 138,000 that I believe you said were your buys:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69423107
I can't account for the other 58,400 shares traded at .011 -- can you? It looks like the 50,000 bid shown in the prior post got filled in two pieces (47,400 and 2,600), and 8,400 stray shares were from another order. I had misremembered that the unaccounted-for trade was at 2:14, but I guess I was thinking of the time that I posted on the board about having added.
My understanding is that Joby bought those 50,000 shares. None of this really makes a difference, of course, except to the extent that it bears on posters' honesty.
If he is front-loading stocks and people are foolish enough to drive up the price after he alerts them, there's nothing per se illegal about that (I won't get into the moral aspect of it). But if he's immediately selling into the pop, the SEC could have a problem with him similar to their beef with Tokyo Joe years back. It would be simple enough for them to get his trading records.
Are you referring to 11/29/11? If so, it seems that your recollection is faulty. As we discussed in PMs that day, you bought a bunch of shares at the low of the day, right after my bid was hit for 54,000 at .0111. Joby had the last buy of the day, at 2:14, but my PMs with you and him don't indicate how many shares it was.
21% of 0 = 0
I'm just waiting for someone with dubious intellect to call it shorting.
They get bought.
No, but that is clearly the case.
Should see trips soon.
Let me see if I have this straight. Are you suggesting that
GM!
and
GO AIMH!
are somehow not postworthy?
WHAT A SUB PENNEY POS! this stock is EMBARRASING!!
Not as embarrassing as misspelling "penny." I'll bet he would write "nickle," too.
I don't consider this my stock, it is a specultion play!
I knew the risk befor I started dilidalbling....
Even leaving aside the gobbledygook about their business plans, this is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen since Rufus's "stock price reset."
As a result of cancelling 2.12 billion shares held by certain groups who pummeled the stock
throughout 2011 the buy and hold shareholders will see less dilution over their
holdings. The CEO of BYRG.PK was quoted as saying, "We're not happy with the
broker dealers who shorted our stocks and did nothing but drive the price into
the ground. We sought out whose doing what and are cancelling certain shares.
We've taken over 2.1 billion shares from those that caused those massive drops
and are giving that interest back to our loyal shareholders.
One would have to be REEEEAAALLLY naive to believe that a corporation can simply cancel shares held by "groups" without legal consequence, or at all. Also this:
Buyer Group International Inc. (BYRG.PK), following a significant reduction in authorized shares to 1.3
billion, will cancel over 2.1 billion on Tuesday to complete its second phase of
recapitalization.
If they've already reduced the authorized shares to 1.3 billion, how is it that there are still 2.1 billion MORE outstanding? This thing deserves an immediate SEC suspension. Finally, I love this convoluted word salad:
As the participation interests are assigned results will be
paid out through quarterly or annual dividends in the preferred share structure
from gains made through delivery of product.
no worries--my buddy thinks adst could see (no guarantee !!) a FS/RM 3:1 spin-up IPO right on to the frankfurt exchange !!!!-------COULD BE --HUGE multiples after that !!!!----pure opinion----
followed by:
just my adst opinion---the less you can find out about a company-----the better !!!!----hey,a 9:1 multiple puts pps @ $ 12.00 !!!!!----and THAT is pre FS/RM back-spin IPO !!!!----------------------------------pure speculation.
So what do we think, is it going to be a spin-up IPO or a back-spin IPO?
no worries--my buddy thinks XXXX could see (no guarantee !!) a FS/RM 3:1 spin-up IPO right on to the frankfurt exchange !!!!-------COULD BE --HUGE multiples after that !!!!----pure opinion----
followed by:
just my XXXX opinion---the less you can find out about a company-----the better !!!!----hey,a 9:1 multiple puts pps @ $ 12.00 !!!!!----and THAT is pre FS/RM back-spin IPO !!!!----------------------------------pure speculation.
So what do we think, is it going to be a spin-up IPO or a back-spin IPO?
Most understand Low Float can Go Down just a fast as UP
That's Status Qoe thinking!
Call em' like I see em'
Well Jesus Crist! The thing has only 20m Shares Outstanding and updates it's Website!
I believe I said (several times) that what was announced by both parties was an asset purchase, not a stock deal. You said that an asset purchase would include the selling company's stock. I assured you that it would not.
Having not seen the proxy statement I can't tell you where the 2.8 cent figure comes from, but if someone wants to post it I'll be glad to explain it. If not, I really don't care. I don't own INPT and have no interest in buying it.
I don't know how you can say what the company's assets are worth without having seen their financials, but go right ahead.
Sorry, I was posting while on a conference call and was typing without engaging my brain. I meant 4-5 times earnings (what IPC generally calls "accrual-based profit").
The reason roll-up companies like IPC need to keep doing acquisitions is that they buy at 4-5 times earnings, and then the public market instantly values those assets much higher -- IPC's stock is currently trading at a PE ratio of 24, but the public demands continued revenue growth to fuel which can only be fueled by acquisitions.
I don't know. I don't generally make stock price predictions, and INPT's management seems to have demonstrated consistently over the years that it does a poor job of communication. I wouldn't want to expect them to do a good job of either marketing the shell to prospective merger partners or developing a new business organically.
As for insightful thoughts of my own... I haven't followed INPT, don't own the stock, and don't really care what they do going forward. I'm interested in IPC for professional reasons and all I've been doing on this board is correcting misconceptions and educating those who wish to be educated.
Sort of, but not quite. As I said in my prior post... IPC probably assumes that it will be able to increase the number of patient visits to 80,000 under its superior management, so INPT's current number is most likely slightly less.
That one was obviously a stock deal, not an asset deal.
Yes, I commented on that figure already. What is your point?
Why do you think that's the purchase price? IPC generally pays 4-5 times annual revenues in its asset deals.
Sorry, that is just plain wrong. An asset deal does NOT include the stock of the seller. I'm done with this conversation.
I don't need to look anything up. I know IPCM's business and I know what an asset sale is. INPT's practice assets are going to be integrated into IPC. This has nothing to do with the stock of the INPT shell post-transaction.
You said "No way that ICPM purchases all INTP's assets for the current share price" which makes no sense, legally. An asset deal is not a stock deal.
"Notice how in the bold it says "from IPC". Could this mean that IPC is connecting themselves with ICS? More than just a simple asset purchase??"
No -- subject to my comment at the very bottom...
"Quote:
ICS executives Ozzie Bloom and Hina Sharma, M.D. will assist in the transition and integration of the practice.
Hmmm. Why would the CEO be helping the buyers after they had basically just sold the entire company off. Keep in mind the bolded word "integration" for a later explanation of what the word could mean."
Standard language. In transactions like this, the executives of the seller will be required to assist in the transition roughly 99% of the time.
"something tells me that ICS will be apart of IPC after all is said and done"
Are you suggesting that the company's own disclosure is inaccurate? It's possible, I guess - hard to say whether INPT's execs (or attorneys) know what the heck they're doing.
Asset deals are not priced based on the seller's stock price.
Also, IPCM is projecting 80,000 annual patient visits. That reflects their optimism regarding the growth of the business under their management, rather than INPT's current patient volume.
Nice work! I didn't realize that the By-laws were accessible online, and I have to leave the office now and don't have the time to review them to confirm your suppositions, but what you said makes perfect sense legally. It is true that the Boards of Directors of many corporations may be empowered by the by-laws to fill vacancies themselves.
I also didn't realize or recall that Morey was supposedly a director. I wonder whether the stockholders validly elected him... maybe they did.
OK, we are getting closer, and the distinction ultimately may not matter. Whether one thinks Marchi has to be "removed" as an officer or director, or simply "proven not to ever have been" an officer or director -- either way, a majority of the legitimate stockholders can vote to send him on his way.
"Then the shareholders will vote in new officers"
Nope. Stockholders elect directors. Directors appoint officers. :)
They could do that, but that would lend legitimacy to Marchi being a director or officer. More likely, they will have a meeting (or even sign a written consent in lieu of a meeting) electing one or more new directors, who will in turn appoint one or more new officers, without conceding that Marchi was ever ANYTHING for the corporation.
Again, if he resists, a judicial determination may be necessary. That's what happens when shells are hijacked, which has happened somewhat frequently over the last several years.
All of this assumes, of course, that the basic information that has been posted here recently is accurate. If Barton and Coleman don't really control a majority of the voting shares of the corporation, all bets are off.
"This what the T/A told me. He said that if Morey wanted to resign, which he did, he is allowed to choose someone to take his place, because someone has to."
I don't care what the TA said. It is incorrect as a matter of law. It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to elect officers, and this is NOT within the power of an outgoing officer.
I don't know what the corporate minutes say, but a director can't be elected without a valid stockholder vote or resolution. Simply being named as a director on the NV SoS website, in a filing that any schmuck can submit, has no force of law.
One last thing: again, as a matter of law, we have to keep this straight. Officers are officers. Directors are directors. Being the President doesn't mean that one is a director, or give one the power to appoint other officers or directors.
"IMO AIMH is too small to have a Board of Directors."
Absolutely, 100%, INCORRECT. With rare exceptions (including, for example, certain types of not-for-profit corporations), every corporation is controlled by a Board of Directors (which could be as small as one person). Please don't post nonsense to a lawyer.
"E.G. Marchi is the temporary director, officer, president, secretary, and treasurer, until the shareholders remove him."
No again, and this is not a matter of your opinion. It is the law. If he wasn't legally elected, he is NOTHING. However, it will be the responsibility of the stockholders to obtain a judicial determination affirming that, if he refuses to go quietly.
"Michael Morey has resigned as officer and President of AIMH. Through the NVSOS he has replaced himself with Elmer Glenn Marchi. This change does not require shareholder approval since he as the previous President made the decision. But shaerholders can reject Marchi and oust him."
That's not the way it works, as a matter of corporate law. See my prior post on this subject. Stockholders elect the Board of Directors, which appoints the officers. So the question here is, who are the directors?
It appears that ALRT is setting up for a return to the teens. The sellers in the .08-.09 area are all gone except one. I don't understand why the stock isn't .25-30 already based on projected future revenues for their system, but it's heading in the right direction. Lots of shares outstanding but huge potential revenues.
I sold out in the high teens and have been trading it between .06-.07 and .08-.09 for some time now, but I just lifted the last of the .085 offer and am expecting a double on that purchase.
"A bunch of" companies that were already public that did IPOs? Right. Name ONE.