Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$6.95 per trade for anything on the otc (includes pink). Multiple fills against the same order on the same day count as one trade, if those fills are spread over multiple days you get hit with a commission every day there is a fill. Note that if you get a partial fill, then change the limit price on the remainder, that counts as two separate orders so two commissions.
I am a pretty active trader and they have not been willing to negotiate on commissions with me.
As for warrants, there is a two part answer. Most penny stock warrants trade otc so there would be the $6.95 commission. However, most warrants associated with SPACs trade NASDAQ so no commission on those.
I too am not a big fan of AON orders on otc stocks. If the spread is very small I just hit the bid. If the spread is larger, I will usually set my order somewhere just under the ask - sufficiently above the bid to handle multiple commissions if I get fills over several days.
EDIT: the only time I have been able to have Schwab waive commissions is when I have wanted a "courtesy trade" to get out of a worthless stock position so I could claim the loss. They are pretty good about waiving commissions in that circumstance.
So is winter...
Correct - brokerages only started imposing the CE restrictions around September of last year, if I recall correctly.
I doubt that anything else was dependent on Ronaldinho. I would think that would take a little bit of management time but should not take away cycles from the people who would be working on name change etc.
You are spamming.
Maybe not Monday, but later in the week as EOM margin calls come due. Brookers usually square up their books at month end.
US brokers have been accepting sell orders all the time we have been waiting - that has never been an issue and is meaningless.
There is no reason they would cancel your order.
Thanks. I don’t use the Schwab website. I use their Street Smart Edge trading platform. I don’t think the code shows there.
No, they are not. Presumably those were orders worked during each day and then crossed at the close.
Wasn't one of the departing guys CMO?
I wonder if they have built up enough unused vacation that they will get paid through the end of the year. That might be a factor in the timing.
Let's see if AUPH just leaves those positions open (which would favor a buyout scenario) or fills them (which would signal they feel they need to continue to advance their science, conduct further trials, etc.).
I'm not going anywhere either.
Thanks - the AH trades are great, but I am more impressed and happy with the trade for 60,932 shares at 8.26 right before the close. That's half a million bucks. Not coming from iHub!
Where does Schwab show that information?
Look on the bright side - at least you did not get a message that the number was no longer in service.
There is a lot of enthusiasm as there is EVIDENCE that the things longs had been hoping for for a long time are starting to happen.
That is different from baseless pumping and pure hopium, both of which this board has had its fill of over the years.
I am not sure what planet you are coming from, but on this one there is no way the CE coming off (which now seems a question of WHEN, not IF) can be a negative thing for the DBMM stock price.
Thanks for the reply.
That is one POSSIBLE explanation - the best case scenario. The nature of the positions involved (CMO and EVP Research) that are now vacant also suggest that AUPH is not working on further developing their science or IP. It is also doubtful that they both suddenly got new jobs and are leaving on short notice at the same time.
Other than pure cost-cutting, or both of them getting into a spat with PG (why now?) what other explanations are there?
Faster, Faster, the light is turning red...
That would be way better than Chinese.
IF there is a partner.
Nothing has to happen. The company simply can't issue more shares, at least until they either expand the a/s or do a reverse split that affects o/s but not a/s.
There's one big difference - CLHI had a community of people following it, and, at the time, Synergy actively working the shell.
However, to use either "actively" or working in a sentence with our CEO in ASKH would be an oxymoron.
What do long term posters make of the AUPH executive departures? Robert Huizinga EVP Research and Neil Solomon CMO are departing at the end of this month. Pretty sudden.
While I would not buy right now, I personally think that the opportunity come late this year or very early next year - before the merger.
I think that the elongated timeline for merger completion will wear traders out (or simply bore them) and they will exit over the next couple months. I also think that we will see tax selling late this year. I am going to watch SHMP for weakness in December, and then possibly buy back in, taking advantage of the (relative) liquidity in SHMP compared to that of YOTA. Additionally, as with all mergers, SHMP will trade at a discount to YOTA until the deal is actually complete.
Didn’t see the x
If we are at 10-15 a year from now I will be disappointed.
Any idea why Schwab, Ameritrade, and StockTwits all show the company name for SEV as "Sono Group" as opposed to "Spectra7 Microsystems Inc."? Same for OTC Markets.
Is iHub running ahead of a name change that is as yet still unofficial?
I have had limit orders in on TORVF this week but no fills as yet.
Like the story, hate to chase.
Hope you have more than $840. CDEL could have a lot more shares for sale there than the 10K they are showing.
I have little use for either the pumpers or the bashers.
Today's facts are objective and observable. The 211 was accepted by FINRA, we have a new market maker GELD (I am assuming this is Glendale Securities, who sponsored the 211), and the price is up 140% on 15x volume despite the vast majority of US investors being unable to buy due to the CE.
Those are all positive developments.
I assume you meant suppressed, not oppressed.
Oppressed prices everywhere - RISE UP!!!!
Probably. They made it clear in the PR that they expected closing to be in Q1 2023, so I am not looking for anything before then.
Just did - apparently I originally read what was just a synopsis without detail. Looks like there is some potential.
I missed that - was it somewhere in the filings?
GLED is still way off the market. Not that it matters right now to me as Schwab, Fidelity and Interactive Brokers all won't let me add shares.
I don't doubt you, I would just like to do some homework to see what kind of move we might expect.
Can you say how long a time there was between when GLED appeared for those tickers and when they began their runs?
What tickers were those? TIA
I am not really concerned with today's close. I do think that the tide may be turning and the short community is likely seeing less and less downside from here.
The timeline here suggests that the issues were minor. The remediation plan was submitted 10/17 and approved today, and the remediation actions will be complete by the end of January. That seems really fast to me in all respects which strongly suggests the issues were minor and likely pretty common to other companies that get such a notice.
Of course, it could mean that they will simply reverse split before the end of January - that would be a simple plan.
As a data point - yesterday Schwab returned the LWLG shares they had borrowed from me. The rate they had been paying me had been steadily declining before that.
I think Easyjet and RyanAIr et. al. will monitor the results Wizz is getting first, and maybe do some focus group research to the effect of:
--would you choose one carrier over another based on the availability of this service?
--would you pay more (and how much more) for a ticket which included this service?
--is this something that OUR target market customers will pay for for OUR flights on OUR routes?
Subscribe to Ad free and enjoy an ad-free experience
Try Now
Keep the Ads