Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Dude,Lul.
I don't know why you here if you don't own any share. Just wait and see one day the price surge and you will regret for that. Hey COOID, just go find another stock and here's not worth anything for you to hanging around on this board.
Naked short selling problem for the pinky stock is soon to be over, just in less than 20 days. We will be flying soon.
Not to shut it down is ok with me, but why don't they halt the stock for 2 weeks to warn the public? If the company's ceo did something dead wrong like the sec told(mr.RA illegally sells and issued billions of unregisted shares) and thats not wrong enough to be halted? so what's the sec established for? If that kind of illegal activities still not enough excuse to halt the trade, I just don't know what els would makes the sec to halt and suspend a stock. You tells me then.
Although USXP is a empty shell, but it has some values. Its name is famousely known by the publics, it had sponsor for many sport activities for the past many years, such as donation to charities group, also the Mickal option's auction, though it was not a success one, but still caught the publics eye ball. My expiriance tolds me this kind of public trade company has it value and out there many privately own companies would wo tant buy or merger to become a public trade company.
You've explained to me of what? All you said the sec can only halt for 2 weeks, and that's why the sec didn't halted it, that's what you've told me. But that didn't answer my questions. If like you said, that means all other stock halted and suspended by the sec were all meaning less and all are unnecessary? So why some other company's stock did occasionaly halted and suspended by the sec? USXP wasn't halted bacause the company and its ceo didn't do things wrong enough so the sec couldn't shut it down? Or just because the sec was sued by the company's ceo so the sec affraid to halt the trade? Please explain to me JANICE SHELL. Why the sec told the court that mr. RA illegally to sell issurance of unregisted shares and still don't want to shut it down,and that was for so many years. SO what is the SEC for?
I believed the ceo mr.RA will not leave and without a fight. Now we all have no answer and news niether from the ceo mr. RA or from th appointed receiver, why? I believed because the appealing court still waiting for the decision. AS mr. RA last interview, he will File Stay in Appellate Court. USXP web site still fully funtioning, and all division still accepting business order. If the receiver want to shutt down everthing os USXP, they should do it right now to save some money for the creditors, why they still working in good order? That means the receiver was appionted for save the company and not to destroy and try to close it.
If the SEC want to close the door for goods, they should closed many years ago, and should not be now. I just wondering why the sec didn't halted and suspended the trade when the SEC accused the CEO's wrong doing and the illegal activities. The sec should be existing for protecting small investor's interest. Why the sec don't halted usxp when they said the CEO illegally issued billions of shares?. why the sec kept allowed the share freely trades? can we small investor sue the sec?
No reversplit, it's call reversmerger.
Hopfully a bought out or a merger by other company.
The price for USXP just can't go down to $0.0001 again. It will stay above that as soon as any news coming out, and then bingo for all of us.
Oct 15 will be the last day to enforce the removal of the bad law"grantfather clause" for me just wait for the good news.
Seems like you have some iniside informations, huh? I don't know why you people so worry for what? the receiver was confirm doesn't mean any thing bad for the share holders. Today trade volumes over 100mil and the share price is stable, just in about 20 days, the price will be surging to a penny or less. I believed. Since the SEC accused USXP's CEO for his wrong doing of illegle problems, the SEC had never ceased or halted the stock, never stop and suspension trades, why? because the SEC did allowed naked short sellings. If the CEO did that much wrong things like the SEC told, why didn't they halted the trade to protect the small investor?
The pps won't go down to $0.0001, why? All Market maker afraid to naked short further because they knew one day they will be unable to buy shares back for that price. I believes soon after Oct 15 2007, the pps will surging from today's share price. If the SEC thought they didn't do anything wrong regarding the NAKED SHORT selling by the MMs, they do not have to admitted that and the SEC could shutting down USXP by halting and suspending the trades. why the SEC didn't do that? because the SEC knew they did something wrong. The SEC kept accused USXP's CEO did wrongful illegle acts for the past few years but why don't they halted USXP? because the SEC alos did something wrong and the was to allowed MMs to NAKED SHORT SELLING. I personally strongly believes one day in the near future, the pp will surging from today's price to a penny.
The CEO still waiting for the appeal, and the Appellate Court has not rule out for the final judgements yet.
Seems like stop? Yeah you are right, because no one want to sell, the price is very stable, good to see that.
I saw those trucks were small to medium size which almost look like the FEDEX box van.
SO, just wait and see then. You believed what you believes and I believed what I believes< time will tell.
You must think I am blind? I Knew what I saw, All those trucks are small to medium size, too much diffrent than the USxpress trucking's trucks.
It's not over yet for the CEO, he still has chance to come back. The receiver was appointed to save the company and not to
destoy it. Since you basher told many time the CEO was out, do you guy have any proof? there's no proofs at all. The case for the arguement still not finish yet, the case still open until Oct 12, 2007. The CEO is waiting for the Appellate Court and the answer for request for an initial jury trial to present the facts of this case. They still have the chance to appeal.
I said earlier about USXP's possibility of bought out or merger by other company because I believe very much what have I seen, and I have the reasons for that are as below. USXP is a high value OTCBB listing company although it has no real net profits, just same thing likes all other pinky stocks. Its name has a great value, the company is heavily exposed to the publics in the area from Texas state, to Florida state and New York state due to the company's advertised and all kinds of events Sponsorships, also the pervious Jackson Family Memorabilia Auction. Last year I drove from Dallas of Texas to New Orleans of LA and I saw their Trucks all over the highways and the airports. Also want to mentioning is USXP has many divisions and a fully functioning web site. If CAJT a new charter jet company which has no history can surged from $1.00 to $7.00 from April to August in just two months, why not for USXP too? My own opinion is all OTCBB company's are emptive shell with no true assets.
Good for USXP to trade over 135 millions shares today, we will be making a huge profit if we all holding it strong. The share price looks like very steady and firm. When Oct 15, 2007 is coming, all NAKED ShORTERS have to buy back shares to cover their short, and with one year, I believe that USXP will be bought out or merger by other company. Than we will be much richier.
Don't worry, just be happy!
Now all I have to do is wait for the price to go up and cashin my big fortunes. My order was waited long time to get filled.
Great day for me, just got my $0.0002 order filled.
Yes, you are right, there are too many NAKED SHORTERS all over the pinksheet market. The bad thing is not the MARKET MAKER who's short the shares, the real problem is the SEC didn't do the good job, the SEC's law allowed the MM'S to do the NAKED SHORT SELLING, and that's the worst part.
The market makers control and manipulate the share price before the dead line of Oct 15,2007 and they will pay the big price after that date. If there's no NAKED SHORT SELLING, why was the SEC had to removed the GRANDFATHER CLAUSE? If NAKED SHORTING doesn't existed, why OverStock.com won their case? If no NAKED SHORTING on USXP shares, how come the price went lower? My question is who sold the shares for @0.0002 per share? are those seller paid less than $0.0002 per share when they bought them. I believes all those shares sold for $0.0002 were fake or naked short by the MM's. All Market maker thought they can drag down the price and hurting the share to scare share holder to causing the company to bankrupt so the MM don't have to buy back to cover their naked shorting.
Yes I did, I still trying to buy for $0.0002. Just buy in low and sell for high.
This board has nothing to prove the receiver took over yet, ever body just copy the court ruling and the court ruling didn't say any thing when the receiver will begin its work. All we know is the court and judge Lynch did appointed a lady ad a receiver, if she's on duty for USXP, why there's no press release for USXP's share holder and its investor?
Oh no, you just don't understand the American's judicial system. For example, if you received a speeding ticket form a high way patrol officer, you have to go to the court hearing, and the judge asked you guilty or not, you pled not gilty so the judge allow you to appeal, so you will have a chance to appeal. Now judge Lynch dose not allowed USXP to appeal, do you think that's right?
How do you know the receiver was took over? We all knew the court and the judge lynch did appointed a receiver for USXP, but none of any news said the receiver did took over yet, and no news for USXP's stock share holders. How can you say the receiver already took over the job? If the like you said, the receiver take over the company, I believes there will be a press release for USXP.
The American "LAW" is for protecting it's peoples civil rights and it's peoples human rights. How can one court and one judge forced an individual or a businessman to surrended and given up his property or his company without any further appealing? How can a receiver just stepping in takeover and stolen some one's properties and comapany? If there's no appealing for USXP's CEO, How do we know that judge was right or wrong? Is the Judge concerned that Appellate Judges will overturn his summary pro-SEC ruling? Why is the Judge unnecessarily anxious to silence and foreclose this Company? The American society is a lawful country with a judicial system that permits its citizenry, how can that be no appealing for the victim? Is the Judge concerned that Appellate Judges will overturn his summary pro-SEC ruling? Why is the Judge unnecessarily anxious to silence this Company?
The SEC can not and will not halting or suspending the company from trading right now, if they could, they would do that long time ago when the SEC accused USXP's CEO.
If the receivership was confirmed, why was there no news at all? My believes is the CEO is doing something right now to stop the take over by the receiver, or wating for the answer from the appeal court. The case between the comapny and the SEC is not over yet, when the deadline of Oct 15, 2007 is come, the CEO will have evidence to prove there's NAKED SHORTING, that will show the appealing court judge that the SEC didn't do their job in appropriate.
No matter of what happen to USXP, the CEO must do something to stop this kind of unjustice court ruling, how can one court and one judge to kill a compnay without appealing? Appeal to the supreme court.
Those naked shorter thought this company will be gone forever by delisting or file for bankruptcy before the Oct 15, 2007 deadline so they don't have to buy shares back to cover their shorts, they don't want to buy shares back to cover their shorts, they even shorting more shares from now on because those naked shorter believes they will never have to cover their shor when the company collapsed and bankrupt.
That's what the SEC wanted, the SEC knew the deadline for removal of the "GRAND FATHER CLAUSE" is Oct 15, 2007 so the judge rust to appointed a receiver to take over. As my knowlege, the company's CEO still have chance to appeal, he can appeal to the Appellate Court, and the supreme court for the case.
The SEC and the judge tried to removed the CEO before the October 15, 2007 deadline, so the SEC can hidding the truth about the NAKED SHORT problem. I hope the company's and it's CEO will appeal to the supreme court to stop the RECEIVERSHIP.
Over 128 mil USXP shares traded today, good volume and price steady hold @ $0.0003, just in about 30 market days, the NAKED SHORTERS have to buy to cover their shorts. would like to see how much the shorters have to pay for the shares they buy later.
Deadline for NAKED SHORTER to cover their shorting on USXP is October 15, 2007. Just like to see what will be happening at that date.