Not to shut it down is ok with me, but why don't they halt the stock for 2 weeks to warn the public? If the company's ceo did something dead wrong like the sec told(mr.RA illegally sells and issued billions of unregisted shares) and thats not wrong enough to be halted? so what's the sec established for? If that kind of illegal activities still not enough excuse to halt the trade, I just don't know what els would makes the sec to halt and suspend a stock. You tells me then.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.