Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I decided to go back into PACER and check out the Vennwest/HDC Case again in hope that I don't screw up this time. Well it appears the two parties are in Discovery engaging in settlement efforts and need 60 days from 12/8/22 to reach a settlement.The parties are open to mediation if needed. The Judge told them to let the court know at this time meaning today, 1/31/23.
Judge Victoria Marie Calvert, US Dist Judge, Northern District Court Georgia.
BTW... it is document # 62
From checking PACER, Vennwest and Health Discovery Corps were both ordered to report back to the Court referencing Discovery matters today 1/31/23. I believe that was between document 60 -63 if I recall. I accidently closed the session? Anyways whatever information was to be returned today that won't be seen this soon but perhaps in a few days?
Remember this was posted here from "Stonemoney" who grabbed it from "HedgeAppleJoe" ...Now read the full content .... https://www.reddit.com/r/HDVY/comments/uyfazy/ive_been_waiting_for_something_like_this_they/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
This link might be easier to read..... https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17375486/69/health-discovery-corporation-v-intel-corporation/
______________________________
and how about this? ... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166776760
This isn't important but back in December a person sent an email to the Director of the USPTO referencing Intel and HDC
Check out the latest exhibit 3101
https://developer.uspto.gov/ptab-web/#/search/documents?proceedingNumber=IPR2021-00550
I am now incline or sense CEO McGovern will produce an 8-K at this time which would also serve as a strategic move.
Gaandchusu...no doubt there are missed filings and recall George stating several years ago of the extra expense it cost to not file on time but the company was strapped for cash back then and now.
None of us here liked the "D" series shares but had to be done to keep the doors open however and it probably doesn't matter but there again I tend to worry about things that might not matter under the conditions of sunshine or rain....so what am I leading to well! I'm a tad worried about the content/meanings within Marty Delmonte's separation letter back on 6/15/22 or how if at all will that effect CPA auditing.
Post 15380 by tcld55 to Alan81 over two years ago......
I appreciated what you said Allen. It did leave some questions unanswered. INTEL and their engineers operated for 12-15 years thinking they had a patent. I see no reason why they wouldn't have used it, thinking they were covered.
The company fought very hard to maintain the patent. When they were challenged why did they just turn it over to HDVY if they weren't using it or weren't going to use it? I have trouble believing they did not use it somewhere.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160515703
From seeing how CEO George has had to play this due to lack of funds I don't believe he will get the filings in order until some positive sign from Judge Albright in Texas. It would be some time before any trial so George can sit a bit longer if he so decides. Of course I don't like that but we get what we get plus I'm aware of the costs.
_________________________
....I haven't been following the Vennwest?
Ok...next we will need to see how Judge Albright handles the old case 6:20-CV-0066ADA and of course 6:22-CV-356 Now I am saying this because Judge Derek Gilliland removed himself from 6:22-CV-356 which everyone here knows this. Next remember Judge Albright dismissed the case. HDC needs to be able to used the earlier case/date 6:20-CV-00666 and proceed from there, not to proceed from 6:22-CV-356 if it means losing over two years.
Question...is it possible that Judge Albright will just combine the two cases?
https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/judges-calendars/#/waco/alan-albright/2023-01-28-to-2023-04-28/
_________________________________
This is from the old case... https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AOj%2D%5FxLaODQ11Wc&cid=658845AE0CC93963&id=658845AE0CC93963%2187748&parId=658845AE0CC93963%21178&o=OneUp
Now look!! it isn't how much money HDC may gain from court it is how much hype I can place in my wallet long before that possibility so I can smile.
Now this is so cool...next we need to see what Judge Albright is going to do. Yes this is so cool!
I believe the chances of that happening in the Texas Court won't happen until Judge Albright makes his decision and that may not come to pass until Director at the USPTO makes her decision if she will allow or deny Intel's request. What we need from her is to deny Intel's request then that should bring Judge Albright front and center to make his decision one way or the other. I think Judge Albright with all the pressures on him from above him won't move on this until the USPTO does. Pray that the USPTO denies Intel that should let JA do what he does best and hopefully move all this into pretrial but first he will need to address the complexities/twists of Alice 1 and 2 plus all her damn sisters that are trying to hurt us.
...... and of course back out of Intel's web!
I see poster getting pissed at George again over on the Yahoo message board. It appears George won't move on this/gain finances to relist until some type of good next from the USPTO coupled with Judge Albright. Money might finally flow for loans provide good news comes. Referencing the yahoo board.....Look! the STOCK FRENZY will be unreal if good news comes... now coupled with JA setting a court date this stock will finally fly into orbit.
It would seem that Judge Albright is sitting on this case which is not his style and will not make a decision or further motion until the USPTO has completed their task. I also will note that even if Director Vidal denies Intel it still doesn't mean that Judge Albright will grant HDC to move onward to trial. I want to believe that JA is just waiting for Vidal to deny Intel which would help us but as I motioned earlier there are different rules within the USPTO and Judge Albrights Court. No doubt I fall short on knowledge about much of this but is how I see things.
Finally some news but what will hold the share price from falling back again and again? No doubt foundations are being built so I guess either hold this for long term gains or leave....choices?
I'm just pissed in general as it seems every possible problem seems to always be in front of HDC...now when it comes down to being open or positive about this I doubt Intel is stalling or that the sides are negotiating presently, more so the Director and her staff has had a few big cases to determine plus other responsibilities. The USPTO Director and past Judges within the scope of HDC patents and past patent fighting long ago may need to be looked at again. Yes HDC isn't a Intel or Google Corporation but our patents and technologies span many many years and the powers to be to decide might be forced to look at all that but where and how will be the frustrations of the past three Judges surface within the meetings with Director Vidal.
Aside from this I recall serving a 6 month term on the Grand Jury which was all Capital Crimes. Now this is far more in depth and dealing with life and death punishment. I recall discussions during lunch not on any of the cases as that is NOT PERMITTED. The discussion where when do we go to lunch or the case went on too damn long in one day. What I'm saying or the point I want to make with the complexities of our patents and the constant rehashing over and over again Judges and other professional get tired of hearing much of this and start to turn a blinds eye to any fact and may as well throw a dart at a dart board marked with Appeal Yes or Appeal No and simple be done. It isn't their life on the chopping block and is just another damn day before they go home and shake the dust off their feet. The only thing I want to see is for Director Vidal to deny Intel because I want to see Judge Albright's Justice regardless of outcome.
Our case is still showing pending within the latest USPTO release (today)....unreal.
It seems that Judge Albright is not only waiting on the decision by director Vidal but also plans to agree with the USPTO's decision. Since Judge Albright has already has made a few decisions it appears he isn't about to reverse his decision in our favor unless director Vidal tells Intel to go pound sand.
At this point yes Alice could still body slam us but honestly there is more to our patents than an abstract Idea or a premature ejaculation. like some might think.
As for writing our Senators at this point not in the cards especially when you look at the border crisis yet Biden hasn't a clue! and besides Biden is in love with Intel and of course those two Senators that screwed us over. Maybe had JA had walked a bit lighter we would be in a better position at present but game isn't over yet. All in all HDC's timing since the get go starting in 2003 has never been anything to write home about but as I said prior George H. McGovern III has done more for us than all the other past executives.
...on another note I sure would have like to of known what really transpired between Barnhill and Scott Tobin
Well?...maybe it is just me but it seems if HealthLynked members are entitled to discounted memberships at Fitness International LLC’s locations across the US, including LA Fitness, City Sports Club, and Esporta Fitness that the press release should have stated how much of a discounted membership it would be depending on membership level?
I just don't know how Dr. Dent expects to pull a rabbit out of his hat but I'm still waiting?
Yes that was what the rise in share price was/is all about
https:// www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1002004/healthlynked-partners-with-fitness-international-to-offer-healthlynked-network-members-discounted-access-to-fitness-clubs-1002004.html
Somewhat of a great question but believe once NeoGenomic Corporation with and around Dr. Albitar they were able to see just what HDC had within their technology and (may have) designed a parallel application without using our technology directly...but really I have "no real clue".
My thoughts on Intel and the prostate test? Who knows and I'm sure in their medical technologies something exists but prove it? So I ask myself where is the gravy located that can benefit my company (HDC) the most in thoughts of Custer's last stand or the Alamo.
Intel make mega mathematics within the huge Chip and memory markets and have possibly licensed goods with 3-4 technological patents. Intel also is easily seen as abusing HDC in much of the documentations since the beginning of time.
In terms of damages by Intel I said I would never ever place figures in a thread since danger of lawsuit/threats that go back to 1999 under a different alias but if we are successful in court and triple damages are assessed a range of .55 - 1.00 per share is possible or should I say I believe.
The only thing as to a win and we never had any direct product, product damages so what bearing will that have???
Mike...not sure but just checking their website ( as far as I'm concerned) they seem to have something new in the way of gym memberships????
"HealthLynked Members Get More"
Learn more about some of the amenities available in gyms nationwide and join HealthLynked to take advantage of this exclusive deal.
https:// www.healthlynked.com/members-benefits/
He = Charles
Chazzy did not have that many shares left and probably sold his remaining but Charles over on Yahoo posted he bought back in last February.
Chazzy was on BQ list and that is all I will say in public fourm. :)
Zenos...thank you for the re-post....also what I really want to hear is Judge Albright setting a date for jury trial and at that point I will totally believe we have Intel backed into a corner, and then to save both parties money maybe CEO George H. McGovern III will give the Intel Corporation an offer they can't refuse!
.............. The Godfather ...........
Maybe we need to pay Dave to help keep the lights on, it seems every year at this time this happens....maybe we need to arrange a Christmas Stocking for him?
Zenos.... you are light years above me in every area, some of us have known you back in the RB messaging days. Keep posting when you can as I'm sure many still read this message board but don't post.
King...who really knows? ...but anyways I do feel if "Judge Garth Baer" had sided with Judges Brown and Laney that Intel would have had very little wiggle room when dealing with Director Kathi Vidal at the USPTO but perhaps some of us are being too negative referencing the newest director at the USPTO. Sure it is hard to stay positive since we have been dragged through every possible ditch from coast to coast but hopefully the out come will be positive.
Zenos...no need to reply....for some reason I thought that "spread sheet" was a blank and something that a filer would fill out. I downloaded that file and my wife opened it on her machine. We have 3 pending 2021-00550, 00552 and 00554. I now believe we won't see anything from the USPTO Director for roughly 2 to 3 more months.
Just so others know 10/6/22, 10/12/22 & 10/17/22 were the days when the above were submitted.
Zenos......I probably don't know what I'm looking at but it appears that 2001-00552 is also being looked at by the Director and maybe why it is taking a tad longer to make a decision. Now if I'm correct then I feel Intel is pointing a double barrel shotgun at the director to create enough doubt forcing her to grant Intel a review.
Please tell me what I want to hear that I am wrong about 00554 and 00552
Nice article posted by "Mark" from the Yahoo message board ......
PTAB finds Artificial Intelligence (AI) Medical Device Patent not so Obvious
https://www.patentnext.com/2022/11/ptab-finds-artificial-intelligence-ai-medical-device-patent-not-so-obvious/?utm_source=Mondaq&utm_medium=syndication&utm_campaign=LinkedIn-integration
HDVY - 7/3/20 Press release - Health Discovery Corporation Files Infringement Suit
Against Intel Corporation.
Within the following link is the 2020 Court Case filing.
https://97c708a5-4b71-452a-a913-9d2088df68ca.filesusr.com/ugd/5a27d7_4bc7de4a82b346c8b87d1ce9b4e6e48e.pdf
I posted this for new investors but my main thoughts go to the effort
that HDC went to talk with and try to resolve the multiple patent issues.
Intel continued to abuse all of us and they even told us to go pound sand.
They didn't know we were the sand and we just might bury Intel.
I wonder? am I overly thinking this again? ....... Will Intel raise any question on why Judge Albright basically handed off the case to Judge Gillilan and then Judge Gillilan washed his hands of this case?
It was HDC's who basically caused the dismissal.... yes I'm cutting all this with a razor blade but still wonder?
Might be nice with the shares some of us have but $4 buck per share is not practical. Years ago when we had 100 plus patents active patents and a OS around 50-70 million might have been possible but the "Barnhill shuffle" killed everything.
Just read today's 10-Q and I wish I would not have.
I think we need to distinguish the differences between the PTAB and the Texas Courts?
I checked late yesterday and nothing new since the 28th.
I just searched PACER and do not see any new court actions yet.