Ooooh! That's a BINGO!!!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great! Makes it easier to talk about you without you pretending to not see it.
Are you really trying to sell on here that your $300 buy caused the dumping of 30 THOUSAND SHARES?!!
Sheesh, I would hope no one left here buys into such nonsense...
Just admit its insiders dumping and you're trying to make excuses for it.
02/16/24 11:38:13 AM 5 15000 0.1678
02/16/24 11:30:32 AM 5 0.1678 5 0.1709 583 X 60 BBO
02/16/24 11:10:44 AM 5 20 0.1693 e
02/16/24 11:00:00 AM 5 0.1678 5 0.1709 563 X 60 BBO
02/16/24 10:59:48 AM 5 0.1678 5 0.1710 563 X 50 BBO
02/16/24 10:59:48 AM 5 9000 0.1678
02/16/24 10:59:43 AM 5 0.1678 5 0.1710 653 X 50 BBO
02/16/24 10:59:43 AM 5 6000 0.1679
02/16/24 10:59:41 AM 5 0.1679 5 0.1710 60 X 50 BBO
02/16/24 10:59:08 AM 5 35 0.1685 e
02/16/24 10:59:08 AM 5 0.1679 5 0.1685 60 X 150 BBO
02/16/24 10:58:13 AM 5 0.1679 5 0.1710 60 X 50 BBO
02/16/24 10:58:12 AM 5 0.1678 5 0.1710 654 X 50 BBO
Somewhere in here will be a nice dead cat bounce. Of course the question is....where? I was going to guess a short one around $880, but it already had a bit of bounce at $865.
This is so far extended now. Maybe consider it again around $555?
Stop crying?? You're the one who posted to me.
This is the only penny stock you have?? So you are still dumb, but on a lesser extent? Again, good job.
All you post on here is attacks. When are you going to do some research? Why do you even post here? You help no one.
First off, you haven't a clue what PM's I get.
Secondly, well actually hundredthly.....I'm posting only to warn smart people or possible newbies.....which, you don't fit either category.
I guess on this board, if you "invest" more than $400 you can consider yourself "far from broke", but if you continue buying penny stocks you soon will be.
My satisfaction comes from helping people....what motivates you? Well apparently it's the opportunity to post twice a week to call people names. Good job!! You are a pillar to your community.
If you are really lucky, you can watch as stock pumpers make the share price momentarily rise, so you can sell to some poor shmuck who will get stuck here forever. That's gotta make you feel good about yourself.
You only have $334 to add to this stock of a lifetime?? Why would anyone listen to you?
Shouldn't you be taking out a second mortgage on your mobile home?
Sheesh! This is unbelievable, the people who think they are investors are already broke....wanna know why???
Freakin' penny stocks!
BTW, great investment strategy! You are a chartist, but buy because someone tells you not to.
rich2
Re: djjazzyjeff post# 228694
Saturday, January 06, 2024 1:09:10 PM
Post#
228695
of 229590
I like to help people to prosper. That is not my only DD( like you implied). It is one of the tools overall; Like knowing what posters you can trust. Another part of my DD is how long does it take for a rat in the pantry to respond. You just encouraged my to get a little more.
SMCI may fall faster than GME.....People late to the game will be pissed today as they realize they were both too late to buy and too late to sell.
Any predictions how far it falls today before a dead cat bounce?
True. Injuries are the variable that cannot be factored in. Some guys are injury prone, some have fluke injuries, some get hit by a wild pitch or come backer to the mound.
The Mets are a good example, as are the Angels. It is possible to spend, but do so poorly.
However, the reality is, if a team like KC, or Tampa, Miami or Pittsburgh are going to win a WS, it is a one year shot. They must lose for many years building up draft picks (as the Astros did), then must have some luck (again, see Astros). Because unless it's a team of nothing but young kids, those guys are gone the next season.
MLB has really become a mess and there's no putting the genie back in the bottle.
FWIW, I credit Jon Daniels with discovering the secret, which is either you are an elite team, or you create your team to suck for several years. There's no value in mediocrity any more.
You build with great prospects. You put most of those prospects on the field. The rest you trade off at the All Star break for a 1 or 2 year contract old guy pitcher who may have a year or two left in them. When your prospects turn into bonafide stars (and only then) you spend on 1 or 2 pieces that fill your roster. Those guys will be loved today, and hated 6 years from now.
ya do realize your buddy moneycrew had claimed in the past that he was working with a team to control the share price. Why not ask him, where the team went and how come they want the share price so low?
Also ask him about all those government people he claimed to know and what they are doing?
You complain regularly about people posting actual facts from the company's filings because they aren't good news, but don't call out any of the people who clearly lied to you in the past. Don't you realize the claims of "bashers" being paid was just created by a stock promoter to convince you not to listen to negative viewpoints? Why do you think the stock price ran up in the past, except for stock promoters lying.....well that and the CEO lying.
It all started with a poster that went by surfit.....you have time obviously....you should Google the history of stock promotion.....or maybe you don't want to know??? Or don't want others to?
I thought I was a genius at $487 selling. Missed the buy back at $460 by 15 minutes. This stock has gone from one of my faves to my nemesis.
Anyway, many called for $1000 share price, so I'd expect selling to come now.
Every morning this week I wake up with the intentions to dump my $HSY....then I don't do it.
One chart says it's hit resistance and about to fall again and the longer term chart says it's about to go on a run. The very short chart tells me nothing.
Help me figure this out.
I think I should have sold at $209....then again at $199.
Some of you have complained that I've never looked into the actual patents, so I spent a little time on it yesterday. I've always wondered what the inventors of the patents in question are doing now for the company, but have come to learn, that VPLM DIDN'T even invent anything! They bought the patents from Digifonica??? So, this other company didn't think there was all that much value to them and sold them, and as suspected....this is all VPLM IS! A patent troll company.
I can't fathom what all you are defending??
And several have said VPLM has never lost a case??? I see many of the cases thrown out of court.
https://insight.rpxcorp.com/news/69974-federal-circuit-declines-to-fix-voip-pal-s-problem-of-its-own-making
https://appleworld.today/patent-trollin-voip-pal-sues-apple-for-the-fourth-at-least-time/
I never expect to get much from a class action suit anyway.
Funny thing is, the only stock I ever got a hefty sum from was a stock I actually made money on from the trade.
I'm not thrilled by our lack of moves this year, but the TV contract seemed to tie our hands....or at least give an excuse for not spending.
My fear is the thinking that the fans are too thrilled from last year to complain about anything going forward. In my mind, the Astros are once again the team to beat and the Rangers just found lightening in a bottle.
Nonetheless, if the Dodgers don't win it all this year then, it's impossible to spend your way to a championship. What they've done really looks like overkill. Guess we will see if team chemistry wins out.
One of my very largest losses years ago was in a floating rate short term bond fund. They were advertised as not moving more than 3% in value either way with a small dividend that beat money market. Instead they all went through a major crash. Going from $10 per share down to around $2.70.
NEVER buy a derivative product. Ask anyone who owned a CMO.
https://www.morningstar.com/funds/how-short-term-bond-funds-went-wrong-again
Yeccchhhhh.....how do you even call something without meat, a burger?
Looks like those lawsuits are mostly fluff.
Sadly, he'll find someone to overpay....Not sure where the Rangers are in willingness to spend more now, but I know Monty wants to come back.
He was fantastic at last years' price. He deserves to get paid, but at what value?
Anyone here own any $CCEP?
LESS PUNISHING GUIDANCE
Companies that lower guidance when they
report quarterly earnings have historically
averaged a one-day decline of 5.4% in
reaction to the news. Stocks that have
lowered guidance when reporting earnings
this quarter, however, have only fallen 2.8%
on their earnings reaction days, meaning
that so far in 2024, investors aren’t punishing
weak earnings guidance nearly as much as
OPENING THE SPIGOT
According to the NY Fed’s quarterly Household
Debt and Credit report, 8.52% of credit card
loans became newly delinquent in Q4 2023,
which was the highest reading since Q2 2011.
Credit card utilization, or the percentage of
credit extended to consumers that’s been
used, also ticked up to 23.5% in Q4, which was
the highest reading since Q4 2019 just before
COVID hit.
(SOURCE: NY FED)
I guess I hit that one right. Up about 40% in it.
Nice job. I kept forgetting to buy AVGO on several occasions.
How many years have you all been waiting now?
The length of time it takes for a patent lawsuit to go to trial and get resolved can vary widely depending on various factors such as the complexity of the case, the backlog of the court, and the willingness of the parties to settle. On average, it can take anywhere from 1 to 3 years for a patent lawsuit to go to trial and get resolved. However, in some cases, it can take longer, especially if the case involves highly technical or complex patents.
Good job. I do see it has hit $999 today. Considering I had bought at $37, it may well be one of those once in a lifetimes, but sure wouldn't want to end up like the GME people who have kept their shares.
For some dumb reason, I'm currently buying conservative stocks, when AI does seem like the play. Picking the right one is the tricky part.
Again, there was a time when all managers strived to beat the index. The only fund family I see doing it with any consistency now is American Funds.....which is who I use mostly.
I guess Chris Young is going to call Boras's bluff regarding Montgomery.
OK, well good on you for saying so. Now, why are we feeling a $27k investment is going to influence this sucker at all?
I've always found it odd that people will trust their brakes to stop them, but think it impossible for their active cruise to drive them.
Admittedly, the system isn't perfected though. My car used to almost slam on my brakes when I went under a certain bridge. Something weird about the way they constructed the wall of the bridge.
ehhhh, not so much....this was it's top of the market at the time. Within a month the stock was at .63....I believe you called me "salty" when I spoke out against your recommendation.
masterofdisaster
Re: None
Monday, August 07, 2023 11:19:15 AM
Post#
10993
of 11238
Buying at $2.75
A planet without oxygen though....ya know, Musk's home planet.....we are just his testing ground.
Well you will be happy (or maybe not) to know, I bought back a couple hundred shares of TSLA this morning. If nothing else, I see a short term move back to around $217....maybe even $240
Of course if I'm wrong, it will look really good at $120.
Hey, I love Warren as much as the next guy (provided the next guy isn't bar1080), but no one ever talks about his ability to get inside information AND not have to report his sales like a mutual fund would.
I am NOT a fan of buying an S&P index fund. It is the only fund guaranteed to underperform the index. Of course almost all mutual fund managers have become panty wastes and more afraid of risk than they are overperforming the market. There was a time the Index was far below average. If ya gotta buy the S&P, I prefer $RSP where at least you're getting an equal weighting. The time WILL come when the big 6 stocks don't carry the market. Although I read now that all the cool kids have left the FAANG and moved on to the MAMAA. 26% of the S&P right there!
Anywho, my only point with your stocks posted is, at they are typically at their all time high. Not a place I like to start out....unless its SCMI.
I'd say you had an overreaction to an opinion and point I was trying to make. FWIW, I left that board, not because people were opinionated, but because it was really a yankees board in drag. Even this October during the WS, all they wanted to talk about is the yankees.....who didn't sniff the playoffs.
DewDiligence
Member Level
Re: fung_derf post# 123474
Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:36:09 PM
Post#
123475
of 209113
Your argument is really dumb. If a single were really more productive than a HR, a batter could simply stop at first base after a HR, which is not against the rules.
Don’t bother to reply…I’m putting you on Ignore.
WOW! Talk about an overreaction to a post!!
I merely answered your query, as I've done in the past. If you think attacking me is helping your share price more than researching Welch's surety bonds then have it.
My "stupidity and disconnect"?? Dang dude, you don't know who all to strike out at. You guys are mad about your stock and want to blame someone for actually reading the filings....makes perfect sense.
Yes, remember all the naysayers insisting he sold all of his shares? Must have missed where they admitted they couldn’t read basic filings when they were posted showing his holdings and here they are again updated to reflect.
I think you said the same thing right before Rite Aid cratered.
From what I can see, he is growing in percentage of ownership merely due to his debt being converted to shares.
Not sure this is the arguing point to defend the stock you really wish to make.
On the other hand, aren't you wondering why a man so astute at finances, is willing to take on the controlling interest of the company....unless he is monetizing it sufficiently?
Shouldn't a CEO or Chairman have the controlling interest?? Are you happy having the decisions of the company coming from a debtor?
I see that now, as I've gone back to the beginning and started reading. Not sure it is quite what I was hoping for though.
As for you, I remember you putting me on ignore back in 2011 for my thoughts on baseball. I also see you've left that board altogether. Apparently, I wasn't the only problem with it.
I guess I've gotten paroled from your jail at some point.
I'll just read here for a while to see if this meets my criteria.
Well, it certainly poisoned my board. We went from a fun loving and informative sharing of thoughts, to some people demanding I boot others, and others too angry to think objectively.
On the positive side, an ineffective government is good for the economy and Wall Street. Let 'em argue amongst themselves, it keeps them from finding a reason to tax me further.
There is no right any more from either side of the aisle. I'd root for a good clear thinking third party if one could be created. However, as I've always said, no intelligent person suited to be President would ever want to BE President.
Dunno, but getting ahead of yourself might mean being wrong too often. People lose faith if you cry "gold!" too often.
I'd rather now he get it right.
Although, knowing what I do about blue chip stocks and their inability to shift quickly due to red tape, I have to believe HYLN should get there first. I'd be more concerned with other start ups.
So, first off....the media is calling for $1000 for this stock, so expect people thinking that's an exit point. Better to be a bit early than a bit late (although not in my case).....Personally, if I were you, I'd be happy over $950. Its like earnings reports, everyone now wants to sell in advance.
BTW, just noticed how many different boards you moderate! Geez! How have I never run across you before?
You need to find a way to spot these breakout stocks a week earlier than you do. I'm guessing, you have a computer setting to spot stocks moving up a certain percent, or maybe based on volume. If you can hone a better criteria, you'll be onto something. I'd suggest a sector tracker.
If you are unaware of Tommy Dorsey and his point and figure system, it may be just the thing for you.
Interesting idea for a board. I'll be curious to see where it goes.