Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No, they are not. Presumably those were orders worked during each day and then crossed at the close.
Wasn't one of the departing guys CMO?
I wonder if they have built up enough unused vacation that they will get paid through the end of the year. That might be a factor in the timing.
Let's see if AUPH just leaves those positions open (which would favor a buyout scenario) or fills them (which would signal they feel they need to continue to advance their science, conduct further trials, etc.).
I'm not going anywhere either.
Thanks - the AH trades are great, but I am more impressed and happy with the trade for 60,932 shares at 8.26 right before the close. That's half a million bucks. Not coming from iHub!
Where does Schwab show that information?
Look on the bright side - at least you did not get a message that the number was no longer in service.
There is a lot of enthusiasm as there is EVIDENCE that the things longs had been hoping for for a long time are starting to happen.
That is different from baseless pumping and pure hopium, both of which this board has had its fill of over the years.
I am not sure what planet you are coming from, but on this one there is no way the CE coming off (which now seems a question of WHEN, not IF) can be a negative thing for the DBMM stock price.
Thanks for the reply.
That is one POSSIBLE explanation - the best case scenario. The nature of the positions involved (CMO and EVP Research) that are now vacant also suggest that AUPH is not working on further developing their science or IP. It is also doubtful that they both suddenly got new jobs and are leaving on short notice at the same time.
Other than pure cost-cutting, or both of them getting into a spat with PG (why now?) what other explanations are there?
Faster, Faster, the light is turning red...
That would be way better than Chinese.
IF there is a partner.
Nothing has to happen. The company simply can't issue more shares, at least until they either expand the a/s or do a reverse split that affects o/s but not a/s.
There's one big difference - CLHI had a community of people following it, and, at the time, Synergy actively working the shell.
However, to use either "actively" or working in a sentence with our CEO in ASKH would be an oxymoron.
What do long term posters make of the AUPH executive departures? Robert Huizinga EVP Research and Neil Solomon CMO are departing at the end of this month. Pretty sudden.
While I would not buy right now, I personally think that the opportunity come late this year or very early next year - before the merger.
I think that the elongated timeline for merger completion will wear traders out (or simply bore them) and they will exit over the next couple months. I also think that we will see tax selling late this year. I am going to watch SHMP for weakness in December, and then possibly buy back in, taking advantage of the (relative) liquidity in SHMP compared to that of YOTA. Additionally, as with all mergers, SHMP will trade at a discount to YOTA until the deal is actually complete.
Didn’t see the x
If we are at 10-15 a year from now I will be disappointed.
Any idea why Schwab, Ameritrade, and StockTwits all show the company name for SEV as "Sono Group" as opposed to "Spectra7 Microsystems Inc."? Same for OTC Markets.
Is iHub running ahead of a name change that is as yet still unofficial?
I have had limit orders in on TORVF this week but no fills as yet.
Like the story, hate to chase.
Hope you have more than $840. CDEL could have a lot more shares for sale there than the 10K they are showing.
I have little use for either the pumpers or the bashers.
Today's facts are objective and observable. The 211 was accepted by FINRA, we have a new market maker GELD (I am assuming this is Glendale Securities, who sponsored the 211), and the price is up 140% on 15x volume despite the vast majority of US investors being unable to buy due to the CE.
Those are all positive developments.
I assume you meant suppressed, not oppressed.
Oppressed prices everywhere - RISE UP!!!!
Probably. They made it clear in the PR that they expected closing to be in Q1 2023, so I am not looking for anything before then.
Just did - apparently I originally read what was just a synopsis without detail. Looks like there is some potential.
I missed that - was it somewhere in the filings?
GLED is still way off the market. Not that it matters right now to me as Schwab, Fidelity and Interactive Brokers all won't let me add shares.
I don't doubt you, I would just like to do some homework to see what kind of move we might expect.
Can you say how long a time there was between when GLED appeared for those tickers and when they began their runs?
What tickers were those? TIA
I am not really concerned with today's close. I do think that the tide may be turning and the short community is likely seeing less and less downside from here.
The timeline here suggests that the issues were minor. The remediation plan was submitted 10/17 and approved today, and the remediation actions will be complete by the end of January. That seems really fast to me in all respects which strongly suggests the issues were minor and likely pretty common to other companies that get such a notice.
Of course, it could mean that they will simply reverse split before the end of January - that would be a simple plan.
As a data point - yesterday Schwab returned the LWLG shares they had borrowed from me. The rate they had been paying me had been steadily declining before that.
I think Easyjet and RyanAIr et. al. will monitor the results Wizz is getting first, and maybe do some focus group research to the effect of:
--would you choose one carrier over another based on the availability of this service?
--would you pay more (and how much more) for a ticket which included this service?
--is this something that OUR target market customers will pay for for OUR flights on OUR routes?
Well, it certainly is true that an MM would only start to handle a given ticker if they expect volume in that ticker. A new MM is definitely a good sign.
I am retired now, but was an IT guy in my professional life.
When I was a project manager, the QA lead would always prepare a test plan based on the design documents. After that "planned" testing was complete, I would always turn the QA team loose for a few weeks with instructions to "try to break it". Most of the time they could, as this got them into functional spaces not clearly defined or limited by the design but enabled by the design. We then fixed those issues before going live.
It was always a value-adding step before deploying the (revised) finished product.
Additionally, the concept of bringing in OUTSIDE testers is a good one. THey have not been part of the development process and approach the platform thinking "what can this do" rather than "does this do what it is supposed to do per the design".
GLED seems to be hanging way off the inside bid and ask. At present, they show by far the lowest bid and by far the highest ask - there is no chance of them actually being routed an order that would hit either of those.
Presumably a new MM does this as they get things set up before going "active".
Marketing and advertising applies to a company's products. For investor awareness, you would need to point the finger at investor relations.
I agree - it makes sense. Additionally, if they were smart they did a deal with one or more schools to the effect of "we can give your post-doc students something "real life" to work on" if you can give us 10/20/50/100 such students who will do it for free".
If so that's a really smart way to augment your own QA team, and also get a look at 100 possible techie hires.
How much you want to bet that they hire one of these guys/gals at some point down the road?
The whole point of getting a large number of people to test things is that they will try to do DIFFERENT things with the platform, and therefore uncover a wider range of bugs (and possibly a wider range of opportunities for improvement).
I must confess I am not excited about the investment into Glory Entertainment. It certainly is not clear what kind of ownership stake or revenue offtake XCPL gets from this.
What is clear is that they announced this right after closure of the Reg A offering, implying that some or all of the funds raised went into the Glory investment.
Does anyone know offhand how much cash was raised in the Reg A? If substantially more than $250K, we could see other PRs announcing other investents start to roll out.
Maybe IPTK had to have this backend framework in place before they can make announcements and we will start to see some news.