Because it really did not...lol... but hey, make belive and creative addition are awesome when no one actually reads the disclosures provided...lol

Oh and hey maybe you could also fault them on their poor math skills as well....lol... heavens forbid one would actually read through the disclosures in particular the shitty financials and see stupid stuff like this:



Nice going dumbassess, incompetent's and obviously have no clue what Excel is....lol. Why would anyone think the hold up is OTC Markets, when such ineptness is transparently made available by GNCP. Could not even get the dates right, but also cannot add either.... BA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Yeah I know technology is such a difficult thing, to copy and paste and 5 minutes later see the changes made between 2 documents... wow such a colossal effort... especially considering it was dates on 2 pages and took GNCP 12 days. Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Uhh how about a simple process of comparing both documents side by side.... geee so difficult to do...lol... I know DD is work, but sometimes you have to perform such tasks to see what was changed.

I am not sure why you keep asking if the Float is really 37 Billion, GNCP told you it was 37 Billion in the damn disclosure:



The TA tells through their monthly updates in the Held at DTC numbers.

Yeah it really is, considering the first disclosure was rejected because they couldnt follow basic instructions and then felt it wasnt a priority by taking 12 days to change the date on 2 pages. Much like anything, they are not in a hurry to fix the issues and or pay the required annual fee.

You mean that GNCP took their sweet time, GNCP took 12 days to provide an updated disclosure to change the dates on 2 pages, explain why it would take that many days to change a date from Aug 22nd to Jul 30th?

Further you assume that GNCP has provided all requirements of OTC Markets, it is quite possible that the disclosure lacks all the requirements and or GNCP hasnt paid its Annual fees, in either case it will remain at Yield.

The Float is 37 Billion and keeps on rising, from 15 Billion at the start of the year to now 37 Billion shares confirmed in both disclosure and latest TA report for Held at DTC, guaranteed the Float is well into the 45 Billions after the dumpathon that has occurred in the first 3 weeks of September.

GNCP did not provide the disclosures based upon a provided template with clear explanations, and when told to fix it, took their sweet time, 12 days to be exact to address an incorrect date on 2 pages..... Why is so difficult to lay the blame right at the feet of the incompetence's of GNCP, failure to follow simple directions and taking their sweet time to change a date on 2 pages?

The difference is, its not an OTC Markets problem, its directly a company problem to not do anything for 17 days and change the date on 2 pages. Worse yet it should have not happened if the company would just follow simple directions on a provided template. To be clear it is quite possible it still an issue with the company not following directions that the tier hasnt changed, since GNCP has established a trend of poor attention to detail.

Because block orders are only required to display 10,000 and nothing more:

6460. Display of Customer Limit Orders 
  
 (a) Each OTC Market Maker displaying a priced quotation in any OTC Equity Security in an inter-dealer quotation system shall publish immediately a bid or offer that reflects: 
 (1) The price and the full size of each customer limit order held by the OTC Market Maker that is at a price that would improve the bid or offer of such OTC Market Maker in such security; and 
 (2) The full size of each customer limit order held by the OTC Market Maker that: 
 (A) Is priced equal to the bid or offer of such OTC Market Maker for such security; 
 (B) Is priced equal to the best bid or best offer of the inter-dealer quotation system in which the OTC Market Maker is quoting; and 
 (C) Represents more than a de minimis change in relation to the size associated with the OTC Market Maker's bid or offer. 
 (b) The requirements in paragraph (a) of this Rule shall not apply to any customer limit order: 
 (1) That is executed upon receipt of the order. 
 (2) That is placed by a customer who expressly requests, either at the time that the order is placed or prior thereto pursuant to an individually negotiated agreement with respect to such customer's orders, that the order not be displayed. 
 (3) That is an odd-lot order. 
 (4) That is a block size order, unless a customer placing such order requests that the order be displayed. 
 (5) That is delivered immediately upon receipt to a national securities exchange or an electronic communications network that widely disseminates such order and that complies with paragraph (c) below with respect to that order. 
 (6) That is delivered immediately upon receipt to another OTC Market Maker that complies with the requirements of this Rule with respect to that order. 
 (7) That is an all-or-none order. 
 (8) That is priced less than $0.0001 per share. 
 (c) The electronic communications network: 
 (1) Provides to a national securities exchange, national securities association or inter-dealer quotation system the prices and sizes of the orders at the highest buy price and the lowest sell price for such security entered in, and widely disseminated by, the electronic communications network; and 
 (2) Provides, to any broker or dealer, the ability to effect a transaction with a priced order widely disseminated by the electronic communications network entered therein by an OTC market maker that is: 
 (A) Equivalent to the ability of any broker or dealer to effect a transaction with an OTC market maker pursuant to the rules of the applicable national securities exchange, national securities association or inter-dealer quotation system to which the electronic communications network supplies such bids and offers; and 
 (B) At the price of the highest priced buy order or lowest priced sell order, or better, for the lesser of the cumulative size of such priced orders entered therein by OTC market makers at such price, or the size of the execution sought by the broker or dealer, for such security.

Right it is always something like other priorities...lol... Never they blew it off as they dont really care. Besides this is what you stated:

Yes, very minor changes, they had to change the dates on 2 pages and it took them 17 days to do so, they weren't pressed to change the date from August 22nd to June 30th....lol... took them 12 days to do it.... had nothing to do with OTC Markets... Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Maybe they should have done it properly the first time and avoided having to amend because they left out pertinent information. Worse yet, the company is provided the complete template, it is fill in the blank, not difficult, no need for all of the unnecessary trash that GNCP has placed into the disclosure. But then again it is a couple of idiots running this share printing scam and the past performance is quite clear here.

I know this is going to be quite the shock, this is OTC Markets, it is a MARKET, not an exchange. Your broker can execute without going to the MARKET, and may internalize the order with another customer. Pretty standard operational practices, internal execution is always the best route, there are no changes in ownership and is simply a tape documented transaction.

Inventory problem???? Not when GNCP is printing billions of new shares...lol... the small trades are often fee related transactions from broker and broker dealers, nobody cares, the end result that consistently is avoided is the Float of 37 Billion that grows every monthly TA report...lol... avoid avoid and avoid....

Oh but they do, this share structure explosion did not happen without their knowledge:

Correct, this share selling scam and the people running it are certainly corrupt, glad you pointed that out.

Investigate what? There is nothing to investigate, the data feed you rely upon is corrupted, it happens. Clearly the data feed to other sources was not, we can see that the Ihub feed had 9.2 Billion and we can see other data sources were showing the correct 9.2 billion:

This is why one must run two indicators to sniff out what is truly occurring here, the accumulation/dist line is a false indicator, this is proven by using the OBV indicator, if they do not correlate, then accumulation is not occurring, clearly there is a divergence here, therefore it is simply dilution and one tick paints to keep the appearance of accumulation.

Of course, there is always market manipulation and not ever this is a share selling scam. One of these is easily supported while the other is completely fictitious. 37 Billion in the Float didnt happen from market manipulation, a 90 Billion AS did not happen due to market manipulation, zero revenue and zero cash did not happen from market manipulation. Combine persistent dilution and share selling with zero revenues and zero cash and you get a this pig of a scam.

Those are the FACTS.

They are out of sequence trades likely the the blocks of sells from this morning that are now just being recorded, they are obviously on the tape as you can see the volume increase due to them being recorded. That is a TAPE report.

Who said 80 Billion dumped? No one has claimed 80 Billion dumped, but you.

What are you talking about, the Transfer Agent has disclosed the 22 Billion dumped to the end of August, there have been billions dumped in the past week, it is likely now over 30 billion shares at the rate they are going with 6.5 Billion in volume alone today

Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.. seriously.....

A company cannot sell shares into the market to raise capital without registering stock. So no this dumping is debt repayment as disclosed by their own disclosures.

Again you posted the following:

Well Bauman needs some cash to pay his legal fees and replace the money he is about to be disgorged of.....lol.. Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

That is not what was said, this is what was said:

Has nothing to do with convenience, the sources are different.

Nothing fake about it, provide a document that supports that 325 billion claim.. meanwhile the proof is that AS has gone up 60 Billion shares and the float has gone up 22 billion shares.. the real issue with this scam.

Certainly when it is drawn from regulatory sources, who said that data could not be relied upon? Just as the Transfer Agent data provided is relied upon, that is a trustworthy source that is verifiable, unlike disclosure from the company that are not to be relied upon and OTC Markets makes that clear that one should perform their own Due Diligence to verify such disclosures:

For every buy there was a sell, to say there are more buys is a pointless observation. There cannot be more buys than sells. Instead the action has occurred primarily on the Bid side causing the Ask to shift down 33% from the previous day close. That is an accurate observation. Saying more buys than sells in inaccurate and false.

Pretty clear no FTD's therefore no Naked Shares either...

Well when the shares are issued at .00005, it is pretty easy to dump at any remaining volume to No Bid.

No shorts here, that 7390 shares is massive...lol

yet for every buy it is a sell, pointless observation, the PPS is 33% lower than yesterday...lol...

Its pretty clear the stock is trading yet another tick down, it is now .0001 X .0002, while yesterday it was .0002 X .0003.... dumping and more dumping and more dumping... soon No Bid X .0001

Ahh yes, better raise the AS again....lol... On track to run through 10 Billion free trading shares during this next month.. Lumb and Bauman thank all of those who buy their discounted shares....lol

Its been provided, enjoy!

I have confirmed no such thing, I have confirmed he has, prove that he still holds all the shares he has been issued here over the past 12 years...lol.. I will wait.. Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.. About as bad as claiming Lumb holds his shares as well... lol...