Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very well said 1mb. Maybe should even be a sticky. Pink Sheet financials should in all probability be assumed to be inaccurate and misleading. The BS that companies put out to only activate the tier levels and sell shell stock are complete nonsense and blatantly inaccurate.
Not sure what the total answer is, but a fully reporting standard required would definitely be the focus. Pink Sheets could still make a buck, but SEC and GAAP standards would put an end to a big portion of the nonsense, criminal activity, and shell games.
In actuality that link and list is not the most reliable or the most accurate, but CRWV definitely has a DTCC chill according to the official notice from DTCC.
http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2012/nscc/a7360.pdf
Another polite Moderator Note: discussing how a DTCC chill in general IS on topic and has direct correlation to how it effects this particular stock CRWV. And I actually was the one who stickied the information.
Just an added quote from the Texas Authority. Gouger's (BNPD) 90 day extension started the first of November 2011 (was in violation then also and had to be given a severance to renew for the extension) and will end the first part of Feb. 2012. Of course there is not too much oil he's pumping out of the stripper/marginal wells and doesn't have a whole lot to "sever/seal" anyway. But it might put a damper on the pinky stock selling including his permit at the MXXH stock that he just keeps "renewing" over the years and doesn't do diddly there either (oil drilling rig still with a flat tire I presume).
If you do not comply with the new requirements, the Commission will be unable to renew your Organization Report or issue any permits to your organization. Your P-5 will become “Delinquent” and the Commission will begin to sever/seal your leases and wells and will ultimately initiate collection on your financial security.
Gouger better get his act in gear or he is risking loosing his P-5 operators abilities and his license revoked. Always sluffing off the proper procedures and getting in violation. Not a good way of doing business, that's for sure.
Effective September, 2010, the Railroad Commission (Commission) adopted amendments to existing Statewide Rules 1, 14, 21 and 78, and adopted a new Statewide Rule 15 to add the new statutory requirements and to add the surface equipment removal and inactive well requirements set out by HB 2259. (The Commission repealed the previous Rule 15 and incorporated its requirements relating to surface casing to be left in place into Rule 14.) Under the new requirements, all operators will be required to annually address their complete inventory of inactive wells to obtain approval of their annual Organization Report (Form P-5) renewal.
In 2011, the 82nd Texas Legislature (2011, Regular Session) enacted House Bill 3134 (HB3134) to address certain process issues. HB3134 provides that an operator who has complied with all P-5 renewal requirements except for those associated with HB2259 will be granted a 90-day extension to his P-5 active status in order to complete the work needed to comply with HB2259. HB3134 also provides that if an operator has been unable to achieve compliance by the end of that 90-day period, they may request a hearing on the matter. Pursuant to HB3134,
the operator will be required to pay for hearing costs if they choose to request a hearing. The 90-day extension process is already in place; however rulemaking will be necessary to
implement the hearing process; that rulemaking is not yet completed (as of 9/1/2011).
At least two of them are on the "bad" list. And for that reason alone would be a good reason to be at the very least very cautious of them. That just at first glance.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=71208053
Also this link for a quick read.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68938706
No, the likelihood is that it WON'T get cleared up. The FACTS are that chilled stocks don't get cleared up and there is no reason why CRWV will. So CRWV is pretty much a dead horse.
This is the age of online trading. The majority of traders or investors like it that way and way too many won't bother to call their broker for pinks such as CRWV. The money will be online traded in other stocks -- one of the reasons that cause the problems in volume for a chilled stock.
"They are allowed, but you may have to call in your order to trade many microcap stocks like CRWV"
The statistics for the overwhelming bulk of chilled stocks do dwindle to very little or even no volume. No matter how it is attempted to be spun on message boards. It doesn't get cleared up and ends up being an issue for most and CRWV in all probability will end up like the hundreds of other chilled stocks. Thats part of why the DTCC is doing it.
Way too many traders and investors will not want to play CRWV with it's DTCC issues due to it will be less risk, cheaper, and better liquidity with monies somewhere else.
Link to any CRWV news.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=news&symbol=CRWV
Yeah, got to be the naked ones coming through Canada. LOL The next report should be in the next week or a little longer and I'm sure that it will just be the minuscule short data that follows through each period. Maybe even all cleared and zero. I guess not that many really want to come up with the $2.50 per share to short a Chilled sub penny fluffed mining stock.
Just a quick plug and play into MS Office spreadsheet. A half a dozen entries, click, and wallah. Sometimes it helps seeing the big picture.
Here is what that "many shares short" looks like from the last CRWV short data on a pie chart.
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/OTCE_Short_Interest_popup.asp?Symbol=crwv&StlmtDt=12/30/2011
Plan might of been great until the DTCC Chill. Now the waiting until the pps goes up might be a bit difficult. Even if it does spike for a moment (I suspect the pps will go down a bit more before any real spike), the competition for getting rid of the shares is going to be quite a bit stiffer and less brokers to do it with.
Here are quite a few posts that do some great explaining.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/MemberPostsToBoard.aspx?userid=167790&boardid=12546
Also these:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=191577&srchyr=2011&SearchStr=behl
Agreed. DTCC notices for CRWV are definitely very relevant and direct correlation to ability to invest or trade in it.
Tout or pump is only one syllable and GRIFTER is two. The only thing a BNPD investor or trader has to decide is which level of intelligence they want to have. LOL
Best place to do research is the information from the Texas authorities where by law everything like oil production of the wells, proration results (what the well is limited to producing or more violation and eventual shutdown if exceeded), and all the violations that the well operating company (Tejones - Gougers) is receiving (in which Gouger constantly gets and is regularly in violation of Texas laws).
The latest violation that BNPD (Gouger is constantly getting them) has received is the H-15 report that is delinquent. The H-15 is required by law for all shut-in wells which is number 2 well of the Bryan Estate Lease. After a year of non production, well number two is by law supposed to be fully plugged unless there is an extension granted by the Railroad Commission. Right now that is denied and a Severance (violation) has been issued.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS
Oil and Gas Division
NOTICE TO OIL AND GAS WELL OPERATORS
Testing of Older Inactive Wells (H-15 Program)
As Required by Statewide Rule 14(b)(3)
CHANGES TO TEST SCHEDULE
Any well, inactive one year or more and that is 25 or more years old, must be tested annually to ensure that it does not present a threat of pollution. In previous years, an annual schedule was
mailed out in January and all tests were due June 1st of the same year.
Starting in January 2008, the test schedules will be mailed out monthly, and will be based on assigned field. The start of testing will coincide with the annual surveys (G10/W10)
scheduled for each field and will allow 90 days to complete testing.
Please call Field Operations in Austin at (512) 463-6830 if you have any questions.
"I also like the fact that we see a PR and we don't get volume, all this means is the company is doing what it's supposed to do."
Classic, happiness fulfilled, this .0001-NO BID stock (CBYI) doesn't get any volume when there isn't any news either. LOL
"I also like the fact that we see a PR and we don't get volume, all this means is the company is doing what it's supposed to do."
The poster should be real happy then, the .0001-NO BID stock (CBYI) doesn't get any volume when there isn't any news either. LOL
Nothing surprising there for this one. Pretty much expected and the stats are that it is pretty much a death blow. Very, very seldom the ticker ever comes back, not even sure of one, but I heard there was one or two, just don't know of any myself.
Of course many continue to minimally trade on, but not too profitably and not with too much liquidity. The odds against CRWV now just increased ten fold or more.
Some good tips at the SEC site with oil and gas scams.
Once they have your money, scam artists pay themselves first, often using funds to pay personal expenses. In the end, only some of your money may be invested in an actual oil or natural gas well, or none at all.
Sales Pitches Focused on Highly Publicized News. Scam artists read the headlines, too. Often, they’ll use a highly publicized news item, like volatile gas prices, to lure potential investors and make their “opportunity” sound more legitimate.
“Can’t Miss” Wells. Every investment carries some degree of risk so you should be skeptical of any oil and gas investment opportunity pitched as completely safe. Fraudsters often spend a lot of time trying to convince you that extremely high returns are "guaranteed" or "can't miss." Don't believe it.
High Rates of Return. Compare promised yields with current returns on well-known stock indexes. Any investment opportunity that claims you'll get substantially more could be highly risky. And that means you might lose money.
Investor Tidbit:
You might be surprised to learn that the Railroad Commission of Texas oversees the Texas oil and gas industry. Unfortunately, state oil and gas regulatory agencies don’t have uniform names. If you’re having trouble finding the agency that regulates oil and gas in a particular state, enter the State’s name - followed by “oil and gas” - into your favorite Internet search engine. The appropriate agency should be listed near the top of your search results. If you are still having trouble, call us at (800) 732-0330.
Been on vacation. Pawson's stocks never change, he's the .0001 king. The $200 was for Peter Green's weekly groc bill to pump one of Pawson's other trip zero wonders. LOL
Excuse me? Sorry, but been right so far on pretty much everything with BNPD. What just got posted is just FACTS directly from state of Texas, that's all I stated on. Along with this thing has just gone down what? 90 something percent in value from original pump and statements from company plus a detrimental split. Everything they've PR'd has turned out garbage.
Just a little proper DD can be done and see I'm right. Again sorry for the losses.
Maybe this thing can be completely de-listed and CUSIP number thrown in the trash this year. Way over due to clean up the garbage and have it taken off.
Take off? First they have to have some oil, name/ticker changing sure won't do it, if they even do that. All they have is garbage low or no producing stripper wells. Still nothing coming out of anything they have, never did, never will.
http://webapps2.rrc.state.tx.us/EWA/specificLeaseQueryAction.do
Too bad the DTCC, SEC, FINRA, SOS of Florida or Nevada, Brokerages, and the rest of investing public (with NO BID) don't "trust" the ears. They go on documented facts of BEHL and the fact that there was no such company "BioCen Natural Products Development Group". Was stating that at the time. Just a fact. All the authoritative entities that really count just don't behlieve.
But no matter whether anyone wants to ignore Pawson, Hayden (lying criminal D.F.), the rest of the insiders gang, the lying and criminal BEHL promoters, no business, no product of BEHL or BNPD at the time (or now), BEHL is still just a toxic shell with four letters representing it.
One can try to feel better to blame or think that Monique Berry was/is the Queen of Queen Pins, the biggest leader of the criminal minds, hired the prostitute for the CEO, manipulated Pawson (beat him up even) and the Promoter, and controlled the entire thing. But BEHL is still just four letters representing a NO BID, DTC locked, SEC investigated (past and present) toxic shell with no business, no product, no real future.
But I know that Monique's Butler did it with the help of the unemployed unpaid workers and that college grad. They are the real culprits.
I went to the website and couldn't see any PBR's, algae production equipment, or anything else that BEHL was trying to sell. I don't even see where they are selling stock on the public market.
Did you mean that products being sold are in the GIGANTIC algae or natural derived product industry? Or beauty supply that she had connections in before BEHL? Not sure what is being described as "a little strange" to comment on.
I actually did a search for those words in all of ND posts. I was surprised to hear of one due to all the good DD that ND has done on SAEI. I found one that only indicated that wrong doing was done and not that it wasn't.
Maybe it was just referring to the company, promoter, or defendant only stating that they "admit no wrongdoing". That is pretty standard.
Well that's what I was trying to clarify. I would agree that is what it should mean. A very important difference.
Just to be clear. Any User could remove any User on just opinion of the other user?
This is funny. A quote from "my name is Rob"
"Based upon thousands of hours of research and personal testing,"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68202039
And a quote from the 1927 "snake oil" ad;
"We devoted years to this task before our methods were perfected to produce results that satisfied us."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68182048
As always, it must be stated that the contents of this article are the opinions of the author and are not intended to be offered as medical advice. Always consult with your health care provider
Again, where are the credentials and documented true science backing it up. Anybody can just write something up and say it's true. That's the problem with quack science and commercial selling of “snake oil” type products. Where are the authority given, credentials, and scientific community support, to substantiate what is being said. Going to the "Columbus flat world theory" is part of the scam and quackery, so please don't go there.
For one, Columbus went for fortune and fame (mostly fortune), and to trade with India for profit. He made extreme errors in judgment and was dealing with so many facts that weren't known at the time that we now know and have proven theory in science and physics. Columbus threw logic and critical thinking out the window. Pretty common for back then and I have no idea why anyone would want to refer back to it as a place to be. Today's standards of even considering stocks like AQLV and any product they have are quite a bit higher. Real inventions and new treatments now come from real science.
The result of Columbus's quest for riches and his lack of logical and critical thinking ironically killed his men and a whole culture of Indians (name mistakenly given due to Columbus thought he was in India). He died a broken and impoverished man never having his fame or riches. In other words, Columbus failed.
Anyway, back to criteria for intelligent thought and critical thinking and the credentials and scientific authority needed when trying to distinguish reason and belief in claims by AQLV.
I've been going through a lot of the links at this Steven Lower site and it is literally a massive library of information to go through it all. He gives link after link of resource, general classes, substantiation of his statements, and his email. Just in case one would like to send him any sales ads or non accredited blog discussions to debate with him. All of this for free and with only his interest in the science.
But anyone should really take the time and actually go to all the links and read. It will help when looking at AQLV.
Not only does Dr. Lower have a B.A. in Biochemistry, a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry, but he also has a Masters in Organic chemistry. Not only did the professor teach and was part of the Chemistry Faculty for 34 years at SFU, but that Chemistry Department is one of the top 10 rated in the country with over a two dozen research active faculty. No wonder other “sales pitching” and “alternative quackery” might be a little uneasy and try to go after his freely given information, it’s a threat to their existence.
So at the very least the site and all the links may be considered a good place to get at least some information dealing with AQLV and its claims.
http://members.shaw.ca/slower/SteveChem/
I see where they are trying to sell their product, but I can't seem to find Austin Buce, the authors credentials. Where would those be.
Well, we sort of made an assumption since that was the closest mail drop box it seemed to the incorrect address. But in reality, we can't even be sure the extra zero is correct. Who knows where CRWV is really getting their mail.
The fact is that the company could correct it very quickly and hasn't. The only address change they did really quick is to not show it as the same address of their other failing shell, OWVI and try to hide any connection there. So it is quite apparent that CRWV can quickly change an address listing, but they don't and chooses total lack of transparency.
It's all buried somewhere in that big pile of red flags.
Looks pretty credible to me and easily could be a reliable source of information.
B.A. in Biochemistry, a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry, and teaching Chemistry at university level for 34 years. That would entail and include very knowledgeable experience, practical application, lab study, and validation of theory (just to name a few).
http://members.shaw.ca/slower/SteveChem/
I guess if anyone thought they were up to it, they could go debate any information that he has stored with him, and see if they could prove anything different than any of his particular concepts.
Good luck. Hope if anyone does that, they come back and post the results with all the documentation backing it up.
Looking at it, it's really stinky. The B&A were both .003 with practically nothing for volume, then no trades for about 2 1/2 hrs and all of sudden both the B&A were changed to .0077 for about $5-$6K of trading ending EOD at a penny(didn't actually calculate the numbers, but just a quick estimate).
And a quick search on this board for SFIO brings up all sorts of great things about it.
Nothing suspicious here. LOL
Just curious, what was the dollar and share volume of the actual jump? Or what was the stock so I could satisfy my curiosities in the numbers. Just trying to pay attention to the statistical nature of of DTCC locked stocks. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I'm finding that for the most part, it has been generally detrimental for trading or investing in any particular DTCC locked stock.
We also have a factor that more than likely more brokers are going to stop trading of these type stocks or make them too expensive to viably do so. Personally, I wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole, but that's just me. Too many other places to go to have to deal with the issues.
Not if it's just some form of filtered water. But now you get into the issue. Claiming "treatment" and "may be key for cure" and applying it to what? Clinical trials, or just another shelf water over there as "alternative"? They have admitted to the unauthorized "trials" for treatment.
But in this arena of HIV it is the world and they will still have to be recognized with the world authorities, scientific and recognized media in order to have anything validated.
Just saying drinking "filtered water" instead of out of a Kenya river where people wash their clothes, eating right, taking vitamins is better for somebody; all they're going to need is a great looking label.