"Mr. D'Amaro, who is already serving a three-year sentence in a Miami jail for the scheme, agreed to the ban and to a $217,903 disgorgement order to settle the case. While he did not admit to any wrongdoing in settling, he pleaded guilty to parallel criminal charges in March, 2010."
That's classic, like he had any choice but to "agree". I remember reading somewhere where the authorities were trying to eliminate the ability to "not admit to any wrongdoing". That's such a joke.
Looks like internet privileges should be scrutinized in the jails a bit more also.
