OT:i bringing this to FC, so people here will understand why i think your wacko, obsessive and delussional and it is a bloody damn embarassment to me to even have to deal with this.
Your screaming for a test, and then giving BS about scientific method not having been applied is either terminal stupity, specios evasion, or lunacy on your part---only you have that answer.
In posts before , when i wasted my time on this not realizing you are a screaming insulting nutcase on this, stated to you the mechanisms of the process of evolution is not the debate here, it is just the basic hard fact that Evolution is Fact.
Do you even comprehend that sentence???
I have serious doubt that you do, your in some twilight-zone of your own making, and listen not even to simplest statements.
i try once more, then to hell with you if you can't apologize.
Follow the bouncing ball
The word evolution we are using here is as applied to carbon-based biologic forms to demonstrate scientifically the biologic coming to simple forms to more complex forms occurred over a period of at minimum of 400million years.
This means . lo and behold, science can prove , life, at minimum, was an incredibly slow brutal process(that is, my gawd, evolving of time, as are eyes can see by tons of evidence)
Now the "at minimum" should get you , because that minimum is SET because that is farthest back we can go and PROVE the fact of evolution is indeed FACT <bby guess WHAT!, simple basic testing.
The testing is the simple utilization of dating methodologies that have been, through rigorous testing, via scientific method been proven valid tests on the geologic time scale to adequate accuracies.
The tests are Carbon-14. Argon-40/argon-39 dating testing.
As Carbon-14 requires carbon, the most powerful method of testing is Argon-40/argon-39(which requires only potassium or argon in material tested).
And yup bucko, on the simplest bottomline of the most rudimentary need of thought, these prove the FACT of EVOLUTION
If you can't grasp that, then you have a problem, SIR, a serious problem.
I had actually worried for you on this subject, wondering what's wrong with you that you can't get it, but you ar EASILY myself i my worst when on attack-- and you BOBO have been MESSING with me, trashing me, as you rant like a l;ooney on with yopur vacuoss blitherings, and i SIR, have had with you.
Frankly, i wonder if you are soused, crosseyed boozed up when you get this way.
But no more,CT--no more. i have had with you. Max
p.s. i know damned well from experience you will never ever say you are wrong--EVER--a Bush trait, congrats.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
