Britain Urges Sudan AU To Back UN Force For Darfur
This is sneaky. Key words: Western-backed UN force. The UN is a world body. A Western-backed Un force I believe to be a way to implement Bush’s plan. Bush called for a considerably larger foreign peacekeeping presence in Darfur - under the United Nations and with beefed-up involvement by NATO – that would be a Western-backed UN force. #msg-9959909
The push is on in earnest to get NATO troops which would be same as US troops, as NATO is controlled pretty much by Washington, into Darfur. Since the US never made any concentrated attempt in two decades to alleviate the suffering in Darfur until the energy war with China became all consuming and the Dragon built a nest in Sudan, this looks to be an attempt to put US, oops I mean NATO troops, next to the Chinese soldiers already in Sudan.
Yes, Max we are not the only ones who did not help.
-Am
Britain Urges Sudan AU To Back UN Force For Darfur
by Staff Writers United Nations NY (AFP) Mar 01, 2006 Britain's UN envoy Emyr Jones Parry on Wednesday urged Khartoum and the African Union (AU) not to reject a plan to replace the African Union force in Sudan's troubled Darfur with a robust, Western-backed UN force. The AU Peace and Security Council is to meet in Addis Ababa on March 10 to discuss proposals to transfer responsibility for the Darfur force to the United Nations.
"We would like to see the AU take a decision imminently to actually say we carried the burden, we carried it with dignity and that at this stage the best plan would be for the United Nations to take over that operation," Jones Parry said.
Tuesday, Jan Pronk, the UN special representative in Sudan, said here that Khartoum and the AU seemed to be having second thoughts about the transfer.
"The (Khartoum) government is taking a very strong position against the transition (to the UN) and that is new," Pronk noted. "There is fear in Khartoum that the transition will be a conspiracy, which will bring Sudan into the same situation as Iraq."
Pronk also said that the AU Peace and Security Council might be reconsidering its January decision in principle to replace the African Union force known as AMIS by a robust UN force as demanded by UN chief Kofi Annan.
The 7,000-strong AMIS, which was deployed in 2004, has been suffering from poor funding and inadequate resources to contain the escalating bloodshed in Sudan's western region.
"The AU is certainly sending mixed signals at the moment but the previous report (in January) was unequovical that this should be handed over (to the UN)," Jones Parry told reporters here.
"The best thing the African Union and the government of Sudan can do in the next week or so is to agree the handover so that the whole resources of the UN can be mobilized to actually improve the situation in Darfur which has deteriorated recently" both in security and humanitarian terms, he added.
The UN Security Council in February approved contingency planning for UN peacekeepers to take over from the AU contingent. UN chief Kofi Annan suggested that Western countries help by providing logistical support and air assets for the new force.
The war in Darfur broke out in February 2003, when black ethnic groups launched a rebellion against Khartoum, which was brutally put down by the Arab Islamist regime of President Omar al-Beshir.
The combined effect of the war and one of the world's worst humanitarian crises has left up to 300,000 people dead and an estimated 2.4 million displaced.
This could be the catalyst that brings Western troops into oil rich Sudan and Chad.
The push is on in earnest to get NATO troops which would be same as US troops, as NATO is controlled pretty much by Washington, into Darfur. Since the US never made any concentrated attempt in two decades to alleviate the suffering in Darfur until the energy war with China became all consuming and the Dragon built a nest in Sudan, this looks to be an attempt to put US, oops I mean NATO troops, next to the Chinese soldiers already in Sudan.
Bush called for a considerably larger foreign peacekeeping presence in Darfur - under the United Nations and with beefed-up involvement by NATO – that would be a Western-backed UN force. #msg-9959909
-Am
Chad Breaks Ties With Sudan After Assault
Updated 9:45 AM ET April 14, 2006
By ABAKAR SALEH
N'DJAMENA, Chad (AP) - Chad broke off diplomatic relations with Sudan on Friday and threatened to expel 200,000 Sudanese refugees, blaming its neighbor for a rebel attack that killed 350 in the capital.
President Idriss Deby said he would expel the refugees who fled Sudan's troubled Darfur region by June 30 if the U.N. and the African Union did not help stop what he said were Sudan's attempts to destabilize his government.
"The international community has been totally deaf and dumb on the situation between Sudan and Chad," Deby said following an emergency Cabinet meeting. They "need to understand the situation and that enough is enough."
Deby, who ordered Sudanese diplomats out of the country, has repeatedly portrayed the rebels attempting to overthrow him as mercenaries employed by Sudan, a charge Sudanese officials deny.
Gen. Mahamet Ali Abdullah said he did not have a breakdown of the 350 people killed during Thursday's assault on N'Djamena, but he said the toll included government troops, rebel forces and civilians.
He said the army captured 271 rebels and 14 pickups they used, some mounted with anti-tank weapons, anti-aircraft guns and missile launchers. Troops paraded the rebel prisoners and laid out the bodies of dead insurgents at the National Assembly building on Friday.
"After the battle yesterday morning, military and security forces mopped up in the city outskirts, taking out the rebels in their hiding places," he said, insisting there was no immediate threat of another attack.
The U.N. Security Council and the African Union Peace and Security Council both condemned the attack and called on Chad and Sudan to prevent any more violence or an escalation of tensions.
The United Nations has long warned that the violence in the Sudanese province of Darfur would destabilize the region, especially Chad.
The majority of rebel prisoners were under age 25, and many claimed to be Sudanese who had been conscripted into the rebel United Forces for Change. One said he was an adjutant in the Sudanese army, while another was recognized by loyalist troops as a former Chadian soldier.
Some said they had been assured that Chad's forces would not fight once the rebels entered the capital.
The rebels charged 620 miles in three days in pickups from their bases near the Darfur border and came close to capturing the National Assembly building in the center of N'Djamena. Government troops pushed them back with tanks, artillery and attack helicopters.
Deby has declared victory over the rebels, following the second attempt to overthrow him in less than a month. Army officers first attempted to overthrow him while he was out of the country on March 14.
Deby has seen his authority undermined by violence across the border in Sudan's Darfur, where the rebels are based. The path to power in Chad via Darfur is something Deby knows well _ he seized power in a 1990 coup launched from there himself.
A Web site that said it represented the rebels reported Thursday that rebel troops were on the move to the north and east of N'djamena and were regrouping. There was also a statement claiming that rebel forces now controlled two towns near the Sudanese border, Adre and Am-Timam, but the report could not be independently verified.
Chad, an arid, landlocked country of 10 million about three times the size of France, has been wracked by violence for most of its history, with more than 30 years of civil war since independence from France in 1960 and different small-scale insurgencies since 1998.
The competition for power has become more intense since the country began producing oil. An Exxon Mobil-led consortium exported 133 million barrels of oil from Chad between October 2003 and December 2005, according to the World Bank. Chad, which receives a 12.5 percent royalty on each barrel exported, earned $307 million, the bank said.
The Sudanese government is accused of unleashing Arab tribal militias to murder and rape civilians and lay waste to villages in Darfur, though it denies the charge. More than 200,000 refugees have fled to Chad, and the conflict has left about 180,000 dead over the last three years _ most from disease and hunger.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
