News Focus
News Focus
icon url

EYEBUYSTOX

03/24/14 2:27 PM

#169083 RE: murdockkills #169076

Sir, I do not want any such thing. If there was any illegal activity surrounding the 85 million share pump to $3 and subsequent dump to $1.93 on no news, I'd like the party responsible to be held accountable. If the company had no such knowledge then there be no further issue to discuss. I, simply stated, want to make my money back and I am a shareholder. Whether I make my money back through a whistleblower reward or share price appreciation makes no matter to me.
icon url

asmarterwookie

03/24/14 2:36 PM

#169087 RE: murdockkills #169076

Murdock et al...no offense but once again the "meaning" VS "understanding" is right here in front of me.

IR is upset with your filed/or soon be filed sec complaint doesn't mean they have a guilty conscience



EYE was talking about CP having a guilty conscience not PPHM from what I read.

I don't think eyebuystox's words can be construed as "drivel"

Valid questions I believe, not to go as far as an SEC complaint...yet, but I for one don't want to get bit by a lion while my head is in the sand either.



wook