News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Donotunderstand

03/19/14 2:37 PM

#396733 RE: vodkadejour #396726

wow
I have read a bunch of times now

CA wanted 2Billion then 100s of million from WMI WaMu whatever

Then it became WMI offereing 25B or something like that and suing for 445 million OVER PAID plust interest

Then CA and WMI/LT/JPM agreed

nothing to CA
and CA to pay over 200M to wmi

wow - CA should never have tried to cheat

and I wonder which legal team secured this for the LT/JPM

as an H holder this is such sweet music to my earns - suggesting some amount of payment in 2014 on the 10.50 plus pennies of interest claim
icon url

barefoot123

03/19/14 4:56 PM

#396757 RE: vodkadejour #396726

Maybe part of the deal with GS (that hasn’t surfaced yet) was to include the “lack of evidence” statement. I just don’t see WMILT going after GS without something incriminating. Just sayin'
icon url

chaarles

03/19/14 5:27 PM

#396759 RE: vodkadejour #396726

You can't believe the "lack of evidence" argument when they didn't even pursue the discovery motion. Something else happened, we'll see.