Replies to post #42242 on Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[FunkyCoolModena]

Ok, but did you see what comes after?

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233414000006/sharex.htm

"As of the date of this Agreement, the Company has approximately 475,000,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding, and is expected, as a result of the reverse stock split (but prior to the issuance of rounding shares in the reverse stock split) to have less than 250,000 outstanding shares)"

250,000 shares Outstanding ??????

And..

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233414000006/f8kacquisition.htm

"the Company agreed to acquire all a majority (50.01%) of the equity interests in Cherubim Builders Group, LLC("CBG") from PDX Partners, Inc. for 40,000,000 post split shares of Common Stock of the Company (the "Common Stock") at the Closing of the Agreement, which is expected to take place on February 28, 2014."

"Immediately prior to Closing, and giving effect to the issuance of 20,000,000 shares in conversion of debt, and the cancellation of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock"

"and so that after Closing the Company shall have outstanding 60,250,000 shares of Common Stock."

60,250,000 shares Outstanding ??????



of which 250,000 shares go to current EXBX shareholders ??????

That's less than 1/2 percent isn't it ?????


How would you describe that particular impact on existing shareholders Mr. Owl? Good? Bad? Indifferent?



The company may accuse me of trying to "selectively disseminate portions of that information"..

..but who exactly is doing the disseminating here ????



Would you not agree at best their information can be construed as somewhat confusing to dumb shareholders like me?

Separating the reverse merger information on two separate documents?

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233414000006/f8kacquisition.htm

and

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233414000006/sharex.htm

Using the words "the Company" instead of Exobox Technologies when there are 3 different companies involved?

You should have been on the phone with me for the conversations I had with the CEO. Talk about confusing !!!



Seriously now, your opinions on this Board are valued to me. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, are we really talking about chickens here?



The real question to you Mr. Owl is, in your opinion, would this have been a good deal for shareholders? A bad deal for shareholders? Or could you not determine that, with the amount of information that the company released?




Mind you, I (as well as other shareholders) tried over and over and over again to get further clarification from the company. I never received the clarification I was looking for.





Go EXBX !!! Quack quack

[sosjtb]

Of course, and we already know what was going to happen next, it wasn't for the benefit of the current shareholders. This only had a benifet to a couple of people, it's the REASON sean was awarded some mystery shares that would have had over 50% of voting shares to do what they wanted to do.

Anyone with a bit of sense could see that. They tried to sell our "shell" to someone who was going to dump 70 million shares on the next unsuspecting group of traders. No thanks, piss off...I would rather see this shell go to people who would try to make something out of it for ALL of us holding the bag, or see it end at .0001.