Replies to post #1553 on Real Data, Inc. (fka GTSM)

[transformer]

Debra Kautzmann & Real Esate Almanac, Inc. - quite a bit of checking into where the figure for the annual revenue's comes from by me led pretty much no where. Buzzfile was the one I contacted, they said the $430,000-$440,000 annual revenue number was pulled in from D&B. Calling D&B led no where. D&B claimed they had no such information in the report they offer about Real Estate Almanac, Inc. So here you have buzzfile, manta, and findthecompany all reporting Real Estate Almanac, Inc. annual revenues and claiming the numbers published come from D&B, but nothing D&B now has on R.E.A.Inc has any annual revenue information in it. Could be very old numbers but just posted because that is all they've ever had.

http://www.buzzfile.com/business/Real-Estate-Almanac-Inc-281-398-0885
http://www.manta.com/c/mmgkvx1/real-estate-almanac-inc
http://companies.findthecompany.com/l/12251883/Real-Estate-Almanac-Inc-in-Houston-TX

Thank you for contacting Buzzfile. The revenue numbers are only estimates and are annual values. We get all of our information from Dun & Bradstreet. They often model the estimated revenue based on the number of employees and the industry a specific business is in. If you need to add, correct, or remove any informationabout your company you can do this on D&B's site at http://iUpdate.dnb.com or by calling 800-765-3867. This will ensure that it is corrected on Buzzfile as well as many other sites.

Guess someone could drive by there, walk in like a customer, look around at how many employees seemed to be there. Maybe ask how much they charge for services.

I've always wanted answers, just was giving enough time for the company to provide them through audited financials.

transformer!!!

[aspirin]

Loose lips sink ships.

It's one thing to lose one's money to a pinky company venture, it's quite another to lose one's IP to a competitor or unfriendly power. Generally speaking, nothing is ever as it appears. I tried to put this delicately as possible before. The old Galtech Semiconductor was always IMHO a quasi-government firm, a think tank plain and simple, never intended to turn a profit. Investors like myself scout for such firms in the hopes that the Government will release them from their mission and permit them to commercialize. IMHO this extends as far back as the infamous facility fire a dozen or so years ago that destroyed everything just prior to it becoming a major advanced semiconductor facility. But that's another story.

IMHO, Worth Porter Allred and likely his son Worth Clinton worked directly for the Government. Their assignment IMHO was to do research with carte blanche but promise research/IP would not wind up in unfriendly hands. Brilliant as Worth Porter was he was always operating in grey area. His mandate, implicit or explicit, conduct research and ensure said research or IP does not wind up in the wrong hands. I contend the Government always kept him in business doing his thing.

Both Allreds, father and son passed away rather mysteriously in 2011 less than months apart. And here, I'm really speculating. I believe Dr. Frank met with them just prior and there was a decision made for Dr. Frank to carry on the mantle and mission though perhaps in entirely different technology.

All this is to say; it is the Government IMHO that decides Dr. Frank's fate to commercialize his ideas or pull back. The biggest threat to the US economy right now is international theft of IP. My recommendation is everyone to just chill. Let's see a year from now where we are. If Dr. Frank actually gets the Green Light, IMHO both old Ants stockholders as well as Galtech, will prosper in the new RDI.

Please delete this post after 48 hours. No more posts for me for a while. Thanks and Good Luck Guys.

[BurntFrank]

Magilla this is what I wanted from the beginning people checking for themselves not taking my word but considering the facts I put forward.We can do investors a service by exposing this man.I use that word lightly.Investments go bad but you should not be deliberately cheated or lied to.he needs to be brought to justice.Dirty tricks or not Frank.

[wingtrade]

guess what, i have better things to do than respond to all of your rude postings. however, this time i will make an exception. why dont you go ahead and tell the board what exactly you are implying magilla? some of us are traders and trying to make back the money lost on investments that havent panned out by (gasp) focusing on new investments. do you have a problem with that?

a certain frequent poster here was called out by BF, who decided to take a hiatus from posting. I wonder why??