... interesting story, but it negligibly resembles the true history.
1. SHELL: “The shell” (FKA 310 Holdings) was funded and waiting for a company in the typical fashion. If that is what “dirty” is then all shells are dirty. John Bordynuik and all the people brought over from the Delaware corporation (via Canadian Company Private Placement and regular shareholders) were sold shares for roughly “par” value by some of the original “funders” of the shell. John created that “dirt” (if one wants to call it that).
The “dirty” immediate non-restricted share trading room had 310 “funders” with shares at a $0.004 cost basis combined with John’s “entourage” with shares at a $0.50 cost—those are discovered facts after the fact with references to include John’s testimony.
Please provide references to your inferred (evil) Hedge Fund.
2. MEDIA CREDITS: The media credits were John’s doing after the fact—they were not a part of the original “shell” purchase. John purposefully bought the bogus credits and then purposefully improperly booked them to bolster his balance sheet. The distinction to understand WRT the SEC and Domark’s accounting is that the SEC’s issue with Domark concentrated on the asset accounting itself and not the value (as Domark booked it at what they paid for it, bogus or not).
And most importantly—before the issue with the SEC was resolved – Domark sold the bogus credits to John. Regardless—to coin a phrase – “even Ray Charles” could have discovered that the media credits in question were bogus. Did John do absolutely no DD when acquiring companies and assets?
Please provide the names of the person(s) or entities you believe convinced John that the credits were legit.
3. BAD CHARACTERS: The evil organs wanting to see the company fail conspiracy has absolutely no basis in fact. I am interested in how you are somehow attempting to connect individuals (entities?) involved in setting up the shell with the notion that there exists entities/persons who want to see the company fail to the point where they convinced the SEC to actively participate.
Which one(s) of the 24 original funders of the shell are you asserting is a participant?
Placetorent.com, Inc, Emerging Growth Stock, LLC, WestSide Capital Corp, Royal Strategic Corp, Natasha Shula, Beverly Hills Capital Corp, Marvin Bear, Royal Equine Alliance Corp, Blue Ridge Investment Group Inc, The Company Inc, Beau Allen Courtney, Beverly Hills Creative Management Inc, James Parker, Speedy Wire Inc, Next Super Star Inc, Michael Schlosser, Tal Bortniker, Mark Stever, Luxe property Group LLC, Trailer Trash Films LLC, Haughty Fragrance LLC, Big Apple Publishing Inc, Arabella Films LLC, Nicole Wright
I hope it’s not James Parker (that may be a bit awkward).
4. INSIDER/AFFILIATE/ASSOCIATE SELLING: So you are in the camp of no family member has ever sold, or just not telling when they sold and how much? And this doesn’t make any sense: “…Sale of founders' stock to fund a business is the way things work …” An owner personally funding his business or obtaining funds for his business is the way things work-- no one would dispute that but:
... are you saying that: a.) John as the founder of JBI selling JBII shares to fund a Motel/Hotel Travel Business that is not owned by JBI is natural; but b.) other family members selling JBI for non-JBII related “funding” purposes is not?
5. THE TRUE (COSTLY) GAME: And finally, “the game” is played by convincing those who don’t know better that there is an “opposition” and that it is playing all the games. It is “typical” OTC wolf pack bleating in sheep-skin.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
