Replies to post #6241 on T M M Inc (TMMI)

[tmmi_fooled]

""

This was a very concise response. It is inaccurate however with many items missing such as DFI transferring all of the assets, codec and shareholders to DFMI. TMMI breaking it's agreement with first DFI, then DFMI, and DFMI going another way. ""

So, did the contract between ISI and DFI say that contract is transferable ? If not , then DFI had no right to transfer the contract between ISI and DFI to DFMI, unless it is approved by both ISI and DFI.

Who are the founders of this "Dimension" , is this person or persons ever work in DFMI or DFI ?

[tmmi_fooled]

4Retire,

""" It also misses the lawsuit in Ventura in 2002 wherein the judge told Simpson to give the codec and all copies back to DFMI. Yet, he sells the codec to TMMI in 2012. I would imagine something is very askew here."""

""" In March 2000, DFI and ISI entered into a license agreement by which DFI was granted an exclusive license to use and develop the PVS/SGI (VDK 2.0) source code. Such fully-paid license was exclusive to DFI in accordance with its terms.[color=red] DFI was acquired by TMMI pursuant to a stock exchange transaction dated June 8, 2012

So, DFI was acquired by TMMI in June 8, 2012, so what does it matter that the judge told Simpson to give the codec and all copies back to DFMI. Yet, he sells the codec to TMMI in 2012 ?

I believe the above should have settled between TMMI and DFMI/DFI .

So, you are qrguing something which is not an issue