InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Doctor_Hari_Seldon

03/02/14 10:46 AM

#83351 RE: noretreat #83348

I tend to agree, that is why I would actually be in favor of more dilution if it meant the funds could be efficiently applied to an accelerated process.
icon url

FORZANANO

03/02/14 11:00 AM

#83354 RE: noretreat #83348

The only thing that matters here is getting into the clinic. I'm thinking the earliest possible date for this is now late 2015.



If you are right, that will give us plenty of time to invest before the big rise happen.

FN
icon url

davidc2

03/02/14 12:02 PM

#83360 RE: noretreat #83348

So you are ok with what is written in the SA article between the license agreement and the Class A voting rights over shareholders (that's all rock solid?) as being safe for shareholders as a long term investment in those particular regards.

Or do greater shareholder protections need to be in place.

Such as NNVC funding research for MERS but their isn't a license for NNVC for that.
icon url

leifsmith

03/02/14 2:36 PM

#83391 RE: noretreat #83348

About speeding things up: What reason do you have for thinking they are not already progressing as fast as possible?
icon url

WorstLuck

03/02/14 7:35 PM

#83465 RE: noretreat #83348

I'm thinking the earliest possible date for this is now late 2015.



Your estimates have been realistic at the time made. But they always turn out to be optimistic. Fancy that - NoRetreat, the optimist. Any guesses how many more dilutions between now and the start of Phase one?