Replies to post #302002 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[scania4]

Who cares?

[success622]

"...provided however that Scanbuy shall take no action to terminate the Exclusive Patent License Agreement solely in order to terminate the sublicense granted to NeoMedia herein. The sublicense to NeoMedia granted in this section shall subsist so long as Scanbuy has a license to MFR Licensed Patents,..."

Let that part really sink in.

Scanbuy per the agreement is prohibited from taking any action to try to terminate the sublicense grated to NeoMedia. Would NeoMedia's lawyer consider Scanbuy's stopping payment THEY owe to NeoMedia as a prohibited action, thus that action is powerless to terminate NeoMedia's sublicense? We'll see.

P.S. The facts (ie direct quotes, etc, with links no less!) really speak for themselves. Very clear.

[Poptech]

lesn:

MFR then turns right around after that and proceeds to terminate those very same patent agreements w/ Scumbye for the sole purpose of, by themselves, "educating" the industry on how to be scum sucking, paper pushing pimp trolls by staring a slew of frivolous QR code patent lawsuits.

I ask straightforward...PROVE IT!

I can't because I don't believe any of that is true. As an example, the comment that the events were "right around after that" don't match the public filings.

Party Name Court Case NOS Date Filed Date Closed

1 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) ilndce 1:2014-cv-00865 830 02/07/2014
2 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 2:2014-cv-00021 830 01/14/2014
3 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 2:2014-cv-00022 830 01/14/2014
4 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 2:2014-cv-00023 830 01/14/2014
5 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 2:2014-cv-00024 830 01/14/2014
6 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 2:2013-cv-00942 830 11/07/2013
7 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 2:2013-cv-00943 830 11/07/2013 01/31/2014
8 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 2:2013-cv-00944 830 11/07/2013
9 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 2:2013-cv-00945 830 11/07/2013
[Scanbuy and Marshall Feature Recognition Team to Educate Industry on How to Stop Frivolous QR Code Patent Attacks
http://www.scanlife.com/news/scanbuy-and-marshall-feature-recognition-team-to-educate-industry-on-how-to
Date filed: 09/30/2013]
[NeoMedia’s termination of Scanbuy’s license
9/17/2013]
[The last infringement suit by NeoMedia:
1:13-cv-02351-RM-BNB NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. v. Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc.
Date filed: 09/03/2013]
10 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 6:2012-cv-00955 830 12/20/2012 07/31/2013
11 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (cd) txedce 6:2012-cv-00956 830 12/20/2012
12 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 6:2012-cv-00956 830 12/20/2012
13 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (cd) txedce 6:2012-cv-00925 830 12/07/2012 12/16/2013
14 Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC (pla) txedce 6:2012-cv-00925 830 12/07/2012 12/16/2013
[SETTLEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT
www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/containers/fix052/1022701/000114420409053757/v163276_ex10-1.htm
October 16,2009
15 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) nysdce 1:2009-cv-04297 830 05/01/2009 10/28/2009 [ScanbuyNeoMedia]
16 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 5:2008-cv-00199 830 11/26/2008 04/17/2009 [ScanbuyNeoMedia]
17 Marshall Feature Recognition LLC (pla) txedce 5:2008-cv-00200 830 11/26/2008 11/26/2008 [ScanbuyNeoMedia]
[Marshall Feature Recognition and Scanbuy sign "Exclusive Patent License Agreement"
Dated: March 5, 2008]]

This would show that the exclusive agreement was no longer in play Q4 2012. If MFR still had an "exclusive" agreement with Scanbuy, they would not be able to seek non-exclusive CNTS rights as the sole plaintiff. Scanbuy would be listed as party of interest because they would receive the royalty under an exclusive agreement.