Scared..
I did not get an explanation from RB, nor did I ask for same.
I do know that the CAP started a campaign, based on the notion, not true, that we were being paid or were supported by a poster called DDMAN.. an englishman that had posted on RB with some very learned and helpful posts. An Englishman.
ICCDP, a fellow rumoured to work at RB, was blamed for some of it.. But heck, I don't know.
Yeah, i suppose that one can say that things have gotten better. At least, there seems to be a product in the mill at long last, with a chance, however small, of generating some revenue.
One should not expect the sales to be earth shattering. The device is of useful, though limited use. It will find counterfeit medicines, by comparsion of the "real" with the "fake". A thing that is obviously already being done, though perhaps not as efficiently as Valimed.
It cannot determine sterility of IV medicines, but some say that if the IV is "dirty" that it will cause the machine to somehow indicate that. Just how "dirty" it has to get, before being "rejected" I have not heard. BAXA FAQ is silent on that, but it does say that it will not identify an unknown.. or any item at all that is not pre-programmed, or signatured.
It can verify the meds going into the bag before they are therein placed, but unless there is a specific signature available for the specific contents of the bag, they cannot "draw out a sample" and verify after it is diluted into the bag, which also contains a saline or like solution.
It most certainly cannot check the IV bag while it is on the post, being adminintered to a patient. A sample has to go inside an isolated test chamber if Valimed is to test it.
I think that I have told you perhaps more than enough to answer your question.. LOL!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
