I don't know if I buy that argument totally about Otellini. It had been the CEO for almost 8 years. I think that is definitely longer than Barrett and about the same as Andy. Granted things are not as cherry bright as they could have been. I think he was looking to transfer the helm anyway.
"Why not bail and let some `other' sucker handle it? "
So now you're implying that BOTH Ottelini and BK are "suckers"? Do you think you could discredit yourself as an objective reporter any more than you have? And you're a moderator in here?