Replies to post #126998 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[Colonel Sanders]

I have no problem with anyone being disappointed in Intel's efforts at Mobile, I am just puzzled that you seem so certain that Logan will be this home run, when Nvidia strike me as being very prone to exaggeration, or at best, obfuscation.

But as to Logan's potency, its 192 GPU cores is half of the number that go into a discrete GeForce 630, is it not?

Now I don't know if the clockspeeds of the GPU cores in Logan will be the same as they were in the discrete GF630, or lower, but how does 16 Gen 8 EU's likely stack up against half a GF630?

[walbert]

"But the point still stands: Intel is busy goofing off by "giving away" under-powered Bay Trails while the rest of the SoC world is iterating next generation parts."

[Goofing off. Giving away.

This isn't analysis, it's character assassination stated as a cheap shot. These comments have more to do with your emotions than with the situation.

Just a very short time ago you were saying how great your Dell Venue Pro was. Now it's an under-powered Bay Trail that Intel is giving away. The K1 isn't even shipping and by the time it does Intel will have newer more competitive products. You are comparing Intel's current products with Nvidia's future products. How objective is that?

There is nothing in particular about the Tegra K1 that will impact Intel. It doesn't have broad application. It's a niche product competing in an area where Intel is quite content with its slow but steady progress. I totally disagree that this is the kind of thing Intel should be focusing on. All of computing is preparing to move to the next level and this has little to do with it.

Because you are a gamer you seem to think that all of Intel's efforts should be in the sphere. ]