News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ltesprit

02/05/06 11:53 AM

#217875 RE: Sputnik #217870

That is possible, but nothing in the PR refers to the company's financial condition. It was a quite brief, innocuous PR. As long as some 'preparation' is done as the PR attests, then there was nothing illegal about it in any factual regard.

Maybe Richard quit, but that would call for replacing the PR, not removing it.

The Jan 9th PR about the 'several hundred million in assets' is missing, too. I e-mailed Rich about it and he said he didn't know why it wasn't there and would get it put back. That was a week ago....
icon url

Charlie48

02/05/06 12:43 PM

#217907 RE: Sputnik #217870

Good point sput-- I think anyone that signed off on all those PRs could be liable--- Even hack PR guys with only one client should know that safe harbors don't protect you from fraud