I'm not getting pulled into anything...Inbreeding in a fact, albeit not a PC fact.
What happens when you over breed dogs?.. Humans are different?..
Because of eugenics and racism, there are ethical concerns with diversity studies. If the Saudis say cousins marry cousins in Saudi Arabia, I believe them. Why should something like that be hidden?..
Your right. Was that not the one where you were justifying the Clintons bombing Serb Maternity wards? As well as other goofy hate speech against the Serbs
Neonatal anthropometric measurement of the babies born to consanguineous couples:
The role of inbreeding in the etiology of the congenital disorders is clearly shown in Table II & III. The incidence of congenital malformations among the consanguineous was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that among the non- consanguineous marriages.
The mean values of the three anthropometric measurement and gestational period are given in Table IV. The mean birth weight, length, head circumference and gestational period of the babies born to consanguineous couples (C) was significantly lower (P <0.001) than that among the non-consanguineous marriages.
The results of one-way analysis of variance do not show any significant mean difference amongst FC, FOR and SC at 5% level of probability. The variance ratios (F) were 1.50, 1.54, 1.49 and 1.47, respectively for birth weight, length, head circumference and gestational period with df 3 and 1668, whereas in the results of regression analysis, inbreeding showed a significant negative correlation with all parameters. The slopes (b) - 7861.28±241.21,- 48.35±0.47, - 47.98±0.34, - 37.85±0.38, - 605.78±4.37 were significant at p <0.001 for birth weight, length, head circumference, gestational and congenital malformation, respectively.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
