News Focus
News Focus
icon url

redhot

04/24/03 10:11 PM

#101298 RE: Zeev Hed #101245

ZEEV-rise of crude oil prices above a calculated, known level will cause loss of control of the petro-trade by those who value that control, and its dominating leverage, beyond all other considerations.
The loss of control by fostering viable alternatives like shale/tarsands extraction or development of known, existing petro-deposits or growth of other energy sources is a most real threat to those already in the driver's seat, and daily causes those persons to sink deeper into their suppressive fixations.
Consider the anomoly that Saudi Arabia [and Kuwait] had [and still largely has] no military, apart from population-control forces, to logically balance the very real threat to its black-gold fortunes, which under any rational view are a prime target for any, hungry have or have-not. It is clear that a deal was long-ago made to guarantee, by force, the dominant Wahabee [Saud] family its throne, in exchange for ...you guessed it..the dollars, etc being vested in the USA and other, directed recipients.
Only one time that guarantee was called visibly into play. That was when the Sabah family of Kuwait, with a like arrangement, was forced to flee when S. Hussein walked-in. With the Saud family watching intently to observe the first, real test of the quid-pro-quo, Kuwait was most aggressively recovered for the Sabah family's safe return...recovered forcefully by the US military with the less obvious participation of others.
That test reassured the Saud family of the workability of its own, like deal.
The above scenario may account for seemingly irrational movements and trends in world and local "markets" of any kind.
So much for my blog. redhot
icon url

mish

04/24/03 11:48 PM

#101319 RE: Zeev Hed #101245

Thanks, John, a very rational analysis. I have suggested a long time ago that crude should bear a variable tax bringing it to an average of $30 to $35/barrel. At that price a good incentive for exploiting Canadian shales which are,m as far as I understand quite plentiful, will be in place and the capital to build facilities will be plenty, if that minimal price can be assured. That is, IMTO, a major reason the Saudi do not want oil to be around $30 for too long. We got to do it ourselves. One of the rare cases where I think that taxation should be used to create energy independence. Since that adjustment to $30/barrel has already been made, now would be a perfect time...

Zeev


Zeev this seem like a change in opinion but perhaps I am wrong.
Didn't you recently say that dropping crude prices would help the economy and boost GDP by something like 1% (1/2% perhaps) and help keep us out of recession. The author of that article made a case that falling oil prices will not necessarily do much for GDP.

M

icon url

SantaCruz

04/25/03 2:36 PM

#101686 RE: Zeev Hed #101245

I was under the impression that our government subsidizes the price of oil. If they didn't, the US would have gas prices similar to europe. Like $5 a gallon.