InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

236T568

12/11/13 10:31 AM

#139 RE: risk on #138

What is it about the FACT that the SEC can only suspend a stock for ten days MAXIMUM that YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND?

and the stock was absolutely suspended by the SEC for 10 days



Not defending this terd, just stating a fact. It is trading, and was not halted. The SEC works closely w FINRA, and could of easily had them permanently halt it

.
icon url

janice shell

12/11/13 1:19 PM

#149 RE: risk on #138

The SEC works closely w FINRA, and could of easily had them permanently halt it.

Not really. When, exactly, have you seen that happen? I never have, and I've been following SEC suspensions for a very long time.

The SEC can, by law, suspend trading in an issue for ten days, no more. The stock then resumes trading on the Grey Market, as this one has done.

It's a suspension story just like every other suspension story.
icon url

236T568

12/11/13 1:58 PM

#163 RE: risk on #138

What?

no!

The SEC could NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, permanently halted SLCO. They are limited to a maximum 10 days of suspension. The SEC suspended scam company SLCO for the maximum 10 days.

To not know this is just plain silly and leads to all loss of credibility.




Not defending this terd, just stating a fact. It is trading, and was not halted. The SEC works closely w FINRA, and could of easily had them permanently halt it.