Most investors when they see something negative posted by a questionable source about a company they are inv#sted in make some attempt to check the information against a reliable source. I highly recommend the approach and suggest you try it sometime.
Had you done so in this case, you would have found that Dr. Seymour is a HIGHLY qualified MD, not a veterinarian:
"Eugene Seymour MD, MPH
Chief Executive Officer
Dr. Seymour began practicing medic!ne in Los Angeles/ Beverly Hills in the late 1960's. In late 1981, he began treating patients with a strange new disease affecting primarily the gay population. In 1986, he was requested by the US government to establish a testing laboratory and run a large-scale surveillance pr0gram for HIV prevalence in the Hispanic population in Los Angeles"
Does THAT sound like a veterinarian?
A simple visit the the company's website would have saved you some embarssment.
And had you any least bit of concern about the company website's accuracy (even thought they would incur significant legal liabilities for any significant inaccuracies) a simple easy 30 second check of pubmed gives:
Lancet. 1993 Dec 18-25;342(8886-8887):1549.
HIV testing and blood recipients.
Frerichs RR, Seymour E.
Comment in
HIV testing and blood recipients. [Lancet. 1994]
PMID: 7902914 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
See how EASY that was?! You should really try it sometime.
PubMed.org everyone invested with biotechs should be familiar with this website.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
