thecat22000......WE will soon find out. My main reason for interpreting the order the way i am is that the other way it would mean that both parties would have to agree on a date which is highly unlikely."
Well if the both parties can not agree on a date for a settlement conference.......like they are ORDERED to do by Dec 1, 2013.....then what would be appropriate?
The judge should set a date, like it or lump it.
Can his ORDER be totally ignored? Isn't that contempt ?
Market Data 
Markets 
