Market Data 
Markets
Replies to post #110789 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)
Here is some technical smoke since your analysis of how streaming
works is incorrect.
NanoTech takes content, and creates multiple resolutions, multiple
bit rates, and now multiple encoding methods (h.264 and h.265) and
stores those files at its data center in Fremont, CA.
NanoTech's streaming channels, which operate on many different end
user devices, including phones, tablets, and set top boxes have the
playback software which contacts the server for a piece of content.
The codec is not sent to the machine, it's preinstalled in the
machine. Updates to codecs may be transmitted down the player via
software updates (in our systems done automatically and without
user interaction needed).
When the request is made for a piece of content, information is
passed up to the server including geographic location, playback
device capabilties, and line speed and quality information. The
servers then determine the closest edge network connection and the
content is delivered via the edge caching servers to the player.
The player has to have the codecs and the playback software in
order to become a streaming device. Simply having a computer is
not sufficient. We didn't invent streaming, we merely are doing
unique implementations of streaming using our own software.
Right now if you walk around any of these shows you'll notice there
are only two constants behind the TV's showing off 4K content.
You'll see a lot of Redray players and a lot of Nuvola NP-H1's.
...because TV's are all the same and the brand doesn't matter.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
11/24/13 5:35 PM
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
Trying to brand with Seiki is a ploy. Seiki didn't 'partner' with
ntek.
I wonder how much ntek is paying seiki to use their brand name.
Matter of fact, I hope Seiki knows ntek is using their brand name.
AI
