One thing to consider is that the unfettered attack that has been waged against Bob on this thread by multiple people, sets a precedent for what the attackers believe to be the proper rules of engagement.
I actually think that it is a good thing, because one of the problems that I have had with iHub's policies is that the integrity of somebody touting a stock is very relevant information and the current policies seem to consider attacking a person's integrity to be a personal attack.
What the people on this thread have said in a loud voice is that questioning a person's integrity is not necessarily a personal attack and it opens them up to the same scrutiny.
To this I say to the Bob Bashers "Good Job!!!!". This thread will provide a wealth of reference points on how exactly to attack their integrity in a manner that they themselves consider acceptable.
you and your crowd have spent the last three years questioning everyone's integrity except your own. if there's nothing there about someone you target, you and your crowd fabricate things by asking questions that are really accusations but you put a question mark at the end of the sentence instead of a period. if that fails, you and the vigilantes make vague references to imaginery misdeeds, that only exist in your own minds. bob allowed this to run rampant at si, & he is allowing you and your friends to continue this behavior here. this site will NEVER be a success if bob doesn't change, and people will NEVER join in numbers as long as you and your friends are given free reign.
you posted to me, I posted to you. you imply that the problem here is with touts that are upset with si bob. I included you in my post officially, not the underhanded way that you included me in your post by making the post to me. I am not a tout, I am not a paid promoter, I don't get free shares, but I am questioning the whole bob scenario. that upsets you. I cannot help that situation.
The difference is that I never accused you of being a tout. You did make specific accusations about my behavior. Did you read my posts on the CYSS thread? Did you find anything in my posts where I was questioning somebody's integrity? I attacked the business model. Please note that you say "you" in reference to me in multiple places. This is a direct accusation and I am asking you to back your accusation up with proof.
you and your crowd have spent the last three years questioning everyone's integrity except your own. if there's nothing there about someone you target, you and your crowd fabricate things by asking questions that are really accusations but you put a question mark at the end of the sentence instead of a period. if that fails, you and the vigilantes make vague references to imaginery misdeeds, that only exist in your own minds. bob allowed this to run rampant at si, & he is allowing you and your friends to continue this behavior here. this site will NEVER be a success if bob doesn't change, and people will NEVER join in numbers as long as you and your friends are given free reign.
After you answer JXM's questions, I'd appreciate it if you respond to my questions in a post I made last night. I'm hoping that in re-posting the link, the questions are still "fresh" enough for you to answer:
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
