News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tool_power

01/23/06 10:47 AM

#23053 RE: uwlungman #23047

Uwlungman, did you forward this to Sandy Winick? Could be a great opportunity for him to get involved.

Tool
icon url

PENNIEStoSTACKS

01/23/06 10:49 AM

#23056 RE: uwlungman #23047

"(1300 now Pink Sheet companies almost all manipulated by illegal Naked Short Selling from the OTCBB or NASDAQ). How convenient, the most abused companies in history exempted from the new rule purported to stop such abuse, not because of the lack of transparency cited but because it sweeps the SEC’s culpability in using their own words “delivery failures greater than a company’s total public float” under the rug forever! "

Excellent read, Thanks

icon url

sojourner

01/23/06 11:15 AM

#23065 RE: uwlungman #23047

This is the NUB of the thing. For years, I have heard this defense of naked short counterfeiting from people I know in the securities arena. Its similar to the story of the fellow who told the judge he only robbed people whom he suspected of cheating on their taxes. That lame argument is nothing but a convenient rationalization of robbery. If you listen carefully, you can hear the same self-serving argument in posts of those who minimize or dismiss the reality of naked short counterfeiting.


Re: "In an article published by author James Cummins, former 15 year former SEC Enforcement Attorney Brent Baker was quoted “For years the SEC was unable to control the infamous ‘pump-and-dump’ schemes of stock market criminals across the country, and actually developed a culture that believed that illegal naked short selling may be a counterbalancing force to the pump-and-dump.”




























icon url

Canucker

01/23/06 11:18 AM

#23068 RE: uwlungman #23047

Great story. Hope something comes of it....
icon url

power_forward

01/23/06 11:52 AM

#23092 RE: uwlungman #23047

uwlungman--section 18,2nd paragraph: "ALL CMKX shareholders welcome"--rof--that says it all,doesn't it?
the fight of our lives? more like chasing a shadow