Replies to post #135334 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[Teedlum]

Very nice reply. Let the truth prevail.

[AlanC]

Well done, thanks! Go SRSR!!!

[dmbao]

That is incorrect the assay results that we completed concurrently wasn't the same type of testing.

The rest is accurate except for the part that the study has been completed my understanding is it has not been completed.

[es1]

So you understand the difference what Scott did was say "Yup There is NB in there"

Grab samples were selected from the shipment and sent for assaying in Canada as a check,

What the Chinese were doing is seeing how hard it was going to be to take away the minerals they don't want.

So now that you have a better understanding of the difference... What we are talking about the report that a mining giant "can't" complete in a year. A report that IF positive would have lead to a JV that didn't happen.

We are talking about a report that should have been complete in 90 days or less.

We are talking about a report that if Scott had it AND it was even slightly good news would be PRd the day received and would have easily tripled the PPS.

So 1 of 2 things happened.

SOE did not do the report for whatever reason you wish to assume.
Or

SOE finished the report and found it to be substandard for whatever reason you wish to assume.

Either way one fact is clear. They walked away.

Either way Scott would not PR a fail.

You choose which it is but to say that a "mining giant" can not complete a simple report in a year is just plain foolishness.

I don't think many are that blind which is why there is no buying going on.
I think trying to convince people that everything is fine here is ridiculous