we are posting on an anonymous message board while PPHM is bringing their message before a global lung cancer conference.
Plenty of great minds at the conference for sure. It would be nice to rub elbows with these elite minds. I consider my Grandfather a great doctor and great mind too, he used to say, "don't be intimidated by knowledge, and intelligence, as even a dummy like you could learn something by embracing it" :)
Some truth to that, as he never posted on an internet message board, but I do!
It is not PPHM jumping on any band wagon here, it is the scientific community working through new insights as to how complex interventions in the body's immune system are allowing cancer to proliferate and how PPHM and others are bringing forward treatments that are serving to unmask and work around those mechanisms that are preventing the body's immune system from attacking the cancer
The scientific community has been trying to figure it out for decades. The problem is that until big pharma decided there might be something there, it never gained traction. Now that immunotherapy has legs, you see cliche names like "checkpoint", and "upstream", being thrown around.
In my opinion, without proper recognition, Dr. Thorpe has provided a "wagon" for which others have jumped on, and decided to style it with cache, clicky wordage for disingenuous purposes.
I still believe that Phophatidylserine is, and always has been, the cornerstone to such wordage. It's time for the recognition.