News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ssallen

10/08/13 1:27 PM

#25975 RE: integracer02 #25972

Thank you for your gentle rebuttal but I am unfortunately not going to stop reiterating the (IMHO) fact that this company is a scam. There are multiple (and egregious) concerning aspects of this ticker and future investors have the right to see contrasting opinions. To leave this board up to the cheerleading section would not be balanced. I will, since apparently a sense of humor is lacking amongst some participants, be less of a jerk in the future. I'll admit the chump comments were completely out of line.

BTW - Cowards who are PM'ing me. You can have your childish fits all you want but I will not take any time out of my schedule to respond. I also only have a free account so feel free to child-rage out all you want. Its not getting you anywhere.
icon url

ssallen

10/08/13 1:36 PM

#25976 RE: integracer02 #25972

Also, count how many times you utilize the phrases "I believe" and "in my opinion". Every time you provide supporting evidence with those conditions attached your evidence is anecdotal. Nothing wrong with that but it is absolutely no different than my arguments. Without any verifiable evidence, of which neither of us has any, we can only speculate. However, the burden of proof isn't on us, its on HIMR.

As that is the case I will restate my offer. If HIMR provides any verifiable evidence that they aren't a scam then I will go away. Until then, the lack of that evidence (which should be extremely easy for them to provide) supports my argument. If you are a small struggling company trying to get running then being opaque is not what you want to do. Simple and verifiable evidence would chase me away and bring in a lot more investors.

They can't or won't do it. Why is that?