News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

10/08/13 12:58 PM

#167741 RE: jq1234 #167702

As you may recall, I think PTLA is a loser company. I’ve already questioned the credibility of the company’s phase-3 program for Betrixaban, and the $100M raise makes it pretty clear that PTLA will be going it alone for both Betrixaban and PRT4445.

Under the circumstances, it’s reasonable to inquire why BMY/PFE, JNJ/Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo haven’t done more than ink cashless, non-exclusive arrangements to supply their FXa inhibitors for phase-2 testing with PRT4445.

Two possible explanations: i) the Big Pharma science staffers aren’t convinced that PRT4445 is a one-of-a-kind FXa antidote; and ii) the Big Pharma marketing staffers think giving too much credibility to an antidote sends the wrong message to the docs who are prescribing their anticoagulants.
icon url

DewDiligence

10/09/13 1:56 PM

#167833 RE: jq1234 #167702

PTLA starts phase-1/2 trial of JAK inhibitor for “genetically-defined hematologic cancers”:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/portola-pharmaceuticals-announces-initiation-phase-120000609.html

This program is very far town on the valuation totem pole, below Betrixaban and PRT4445.
icon url

DewDiligence

10/14/13 5:33 PM

#168118 RE: jq1234 #167702

PTLA issues fluff PR with interim “n=6” data on PRT4445 with Eliquis:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/portola-pharmaceuticals-announces-first-phase-210500300.html

Presumably, this PR is to pump the stock for the $100M offering in progress (of which a portion of the shares sold will come from insiders rather than the company itself).

I stand by the generally bearish comments in #msg-92793714.