Replies to Post #24489 onGlobal Earth Energy Inc. (fka GLER)

Replies to #24489 on Global Earth Energy Inc. (fka GLER)

YouOnlyLiveOnce

09/22/13 11:21 AM

#24490 RE: Belgianshareholder #24489

There it is in BLACK AND WHITE GLER NO BRAINER!!

terry_mathews

09/22/13 12:15 PM

#24491 RE: Belgianshareholder #24489

Yes, CEO of a company that is 2-months old. Did you see that?

Now how does a company 2-months old, with no assets, and operating out of a condo, come out with a value in the millions (20% = 250 shares @ $3200.00/share value = $800,000). the current market Cap of GLER isn't even that high.

And why would GLER offer up 20% of their stock (overvalued at $0.02) claiming worth of almost $5 Million if HAWK is offering up only $800,000 in stock value?

Feel free to explain how this company is going out and acquiring a reported $26M in businesses (4 companies) with an equity line of $5 Million when the proposed profits on those $26 Million is supposedly $4 Million. Do you really believe these companies are just selling for pennies on the dollar?

If I put a Sterling Valuation on this - Market caps are multiples of earnings and with earnings at $4 Million the market cap would be a 15X factor or $60M. So how does one buy $60M in businesses for $5 Million? and then after that, what does GLER give up in shares to acquire a $60M company?

Note: This is a fictional post with respect to projected market values as the HAWK and GLER PR's are all BS as the value of these companies is unproven. If this is the real deal why are they withholding the name companies? If this is all so good for GLER shareholders, why does GLER dilute their stock month by month to pay bills in a company with no revenues and lots of past failed dealings.

stervc

09/23/13 8:38 AM

#24532 RE: Belgianshareholder #24489

Belgianshareholder, with your “Checkmate” DD for ALL…

First, to add, I saw where someone mentioned that Lambert Private Equity was not credible. Believing such is quite the contrary because if anyone was to research a little deeper, they would see that Lambert is very legit and that all of their deals are very real with some very real companies, especially their one $100 Million deal and their two $75 Million deals as indicated below:
http://lambertfunds.com/category/press/

http://lambertfunds.com/new-fuel-systems-inc-enters-into-usd-100000000-equity-line-funding/

http://lambertfunds.com/featherstone-investment-group-enters-into-usd-75000000-00-equity-line-funding/

http://lambertfunds.com/amvesco-holdings-inc-enters-into-usd-75-million-equity-line-funding/

And now the Lambert deal with Hawk is important as could be seen from the initial link above because of the reason below:

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=59127679
…GLER believes that HAWK intends to use existing credit facilities for more than $10 million to complete this transaction and similar transactions going forwards, and intends to work with various states and local governments and finance authorities on tax incentives, and direct benefits that could top more than $40 million over the life of the company. …

Now I must commend you on your ”Checkmate DD” that you have posted to eliminate beyond any shadow of a doubt that the real John Ragsdale not only exists, but is the same John Ragsdale that the company has been PR-ing about and that we have been talking about here within this forum:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=92264793