News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jacksira

09/19/13 12:19 PM

#295052 RE: lesnshawn #295050

I am sorry LESN you are not addressing anything I said- I have told you what I would do if I was Laura. I would contact the SEC seeing they have a pending case currently against NEOM and work with them to get some kind of judgement against YA. Her OBLIGATION is to the shareholders she has bilked over the years it is not to draw a big fat bloated salary while our investment turns into nothing?
icon url

Poptech

09/19/13 12:20 PM

#295053 RE: lesnshawn #295050

lesn: The 2/15/13 13D/G filing would have been for the percent of shares as of 12/31/2012.

So if Soon-Shiong had been holding, he would have been required to file.
icon url

Decarz

09/19/13 12:22 PM

#295054 RE: lesnshawn #295050

INSANITY R / S TO HAPPEN & AN IMMEDIATE DILUTION TO TAKE PLACE TO RAISE CAPITOL. ...IMO ...IS ON TABLE. ..THAT $1 PRICE. ...HOW LONG WILL IT LAST.....

IT COULD BE MORE THAN 5B SSHARES NEXT TIME DILUTED

And, stating that an R/S proposal (want) and increase in A/S (contingency) as being "foolish intentions" by the company being in the limited option position they are at the hands and direction of YA and past, legal, loan agreements w/ them, begs the question...

What you do in their situation?
} ASKED LESNSHAWN {

Would anybody else here NOT do as YA requires by either, 1) instituting an R/S or, 2) increasing the A/S, thereby meeting the company's legal obligation to YA to provide the share structure in which they can satisfy their "need" to get paid if NeoMedia cannot pay them off in cash?

And would anybody else here NOT do it in a way to more than satisfy the need in shares to do this again OR reaching the point of attaining positive quarterly operating income along w/ having the ability to reach the more stringent pps requirements that some BIF's are known to have ($1.00/share) before they will invest?